Last year we ran a little series called Ask the Experts where you all wrote in your virtualization related questions and we got them answered by experts at Intel, VMWare as well as our own expert on all things Enterprise & Cloud Computing - Johan de Gelas.

Below you find the first 2 answers which answer some of the questions posed in our "Ask the experts: Enterprise & Cloud computing" blog post.

Q (" Tarrant64"): With the growing use of the cloud computing, what are ISPs doing to ensure adequate bandwidth for not only the provider but the customers?

A: As a company outsources more and more services to the cloud, it gets increasingly important to make sure that the internet connection is not the single point of failure. Quite a few Cloud vendors understand this and offer dedicated links to their data centers and provide appropriate SLAs for uptime or response time. Of course these SLA are pretty expensive. These kind of "network costs" are often "forgotten" when vendors praise the cost efficiency of "going cloud".

Or the short answer: Don't rely on a simple internet connection to an ISP if you are planning to outsource vital IT services.

(" Tarrant64"): How do the cloud servers give results so fast? I imagine there is literally Petabytes of data in Google servers and it would be way too expensive to run on SSDs. Is their some sort of hierarchy that masks latency? Even then wouldn't it still take long just to communicate to the server itself?

Currently we have been in contact with some of the engineers of Facebook as we are evaluating the servers that are part of Facebook's Opencompute Project. Facebook built their own software, servers and of course datacenters and is sharing these technologies. As Facebook is a lot more open about their underlying architecture, I will focus on Facebook.

The foundations of facebook are not different from what most sites use: PHP and MySQL. But that is not a very scalable combination. The first trick that the Facebook engineers used was to compile the PHP code into C++ code with the help of their own "HipHop" software. C++ code can be compiled in much better performing and smaller binaries. Facebook reported that this alone reduced CPU usage by 50%. These binaries which are compute intensive are now run on Dual Xeons "Westmere"

A look inside an empty datacenter room at Facebook.

The main speedup comes from an improved version of memcached. In the early days of Facebook, it was Mark Zuckerberg himself who improved this opensource software. He describes the improvements Facebook did to Memcached here. By caching the web objects, only 5% of the requests have to make use of the database. Memcached runs on many dual Opteron "Magny-Cours" servers as these servers are the cheapest way to house 384 GB (now even 512 GB in version 2) of RAM in one server.

The most recent cache servers are AMD Magny-Cours based. Notice the 12 DIMM slots on each CPU node

 

The database (of the inbox for example) is not a plain MySQL either. It is based upon a distributed database management system, called Cassandra. Cassandra works decentralized and is able to scale horizontally, e.g. across cheap servers. This in great contrast with most relational databases which scale only vertically well unless you pay huge premiums for complex stuff like Oracle RAC.

POST A COMMENT

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • KentState - Sunday, July 31, 2011 - link

    Exactly. I think it's funny how the article quickly glosses over how vastly different noSQL and a RDMS are. Companies like FB and Amazon still use relational databases for systems like user accounts, content and fulfillment. Even FB has had a hard time using Cassandra for much else besides comments. Reply
  • mike8675309 - Friday, July 29, 2011 - link

    A great article which highlights the fact that you don't get to some of these solutions by just slapping mysql or SQL Server on a box and sticking it in the cloud. Reply
  • JoeTF - Sunday, July 31, 2011 - link

    Really, those 'experts' have not answered a single question posed to them.

    Guy asks about storage requirements of Google cloud, and answer is all about Facebook and their CPU use. Idiot answering it hasn't even mention words "storage" or "Google" in his answer.

    Fucking answer bot would have done better.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now