Picking up from where we left off with Intel, earnings week has continued to roll along with most of the major tech companies having reported their Q3 earnings. As we noted in our look at Intel’s earnings, Intel is the traditional bellwether for the PC industry, and for Q3 that bellwether was reporting that the PC market had unquestionably grown weaker, and that Q4 was to be cast into even more doubt. As one of the strongest PC-centric tech companies Intel has significant exposure to any weakness in the PC market, but at the same time they’re also in the best position to weather whatever may come. For their partners and their competitors however, a weak market can be a significantly bigger drain.

This brings us to today’s major PC earnings announcement: AMD. AMD is by far the weaker CPU manufacturer, and while it has some level of diversification through its GPU division and embedded CPUs, like Intel they’re still significantly exposed to the PC market, setting the stage for a rough quarter. Furthermore rumors began circulating that AMD was looking at another round of layoffs – rumors that have seen been proven at least partially correct – which would indicate that AMD was struggling even more than anticipated. With these factors in mind there has been a great deal of anticipation for AMD’s Q3 earnings call, so let’s dive right in.

For Q3 of 2012 AMD reported $1.27B in revenue, with a net loss of $157M. Unfortunately for AMD (but not unexpected) this is a significant drop in both revenue and net income on both a quarterly and yearly basis, having furthermore pushed AMD back into the red after turning a slight profit in Q2. Compared to AMD’s Q3 2011 results, revenue is down approximately $420M, a nearly 25% drop; net income meanwhile swung from positive $97M to negative $157M, a shift of nearly $250M. Finally, AMD’s gross margin was an abysmal 31%, well below last year’s gross margin of 45%, which is generally where AMD needs to be to turn any kind of profit.

AMD Q3 2012 Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $1.27B $1.41B $1.69B
Net Income -$157M $37M $97M

The single biggest factor for this sudden change in fortunes is a $100M inventory write-down AMD had to take this quarter for unsold Llano inventory. In Q3 of 2011 Llano was the biggest factor in AMD turning a profit, but a year later those chips have been superseded by AMD’s new Trinity APU. Notably AMD is calling this a write-down and not a write-off, so it looks like they’re accounting for the loss of value of these APUs (i.e. they’ll have to sell them at lower prices than they planned for), as opposed to simply throwing out $100M in Llano APUs. Nevertheless, even if AMD had not taken the write-down they still would have lost around $50M for the quarter, so while Llano inventories were a big problem for AMD they are not the sole reason for AMD’s rough quarter.

Breaking down AMD’s numbers for the quarter, AMD’s Computing Solutions (CPU/APU) segment booked $927M in revenue, for an operating loss of $114M. This represents a 28% decline in revenue on a yearly basis, and like AMD’s overall profitability a flip from an operating income to an operating loss for the division. AMD looks to have been hit twice here; not only are overall sales lower, but their ASPs were also down.

AMD Q3 2012 Computing Solutions Division Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $927M $1.04B $1.28B
Operating Income -$114M $82M $149M

AMD doesn’t completely break down their CPU revenue by processor line, but they have stated a few facts. For client revenue (i.e. non-server) desktops were cited as being especially hard hit by lower sales volumes and ASPs. As for notebooks, AMD has stated that Trinity’s share of AMD notebook shipments has just surpassed 30%, which implies that the majority of AMD’s notebook APUs are still Brazos and Llano.

Meanwhile AMD’s Graphics division fared much better. For the quarter the Graphics division booked $342M in revenue, and once again turned a small but consistent operating income of $18M. This represents a 14% reduction in revenue over Q3 of 2011, while operating income has actually grown by $6M. AMD attributes the lower revenue to lower OEM sales, but noted that channel sales (i.e. retail) are higher than at this point last year. Interestingly despite the loss of revenue AMD’s GPU ASPs were also up compared to Q2, which is why they turned a greater operating income on lower revenues. Unfortunately as we’ve seen time and time again with AMD, while their Graphics division can consistently turn a small profit, at only 1/3rd the revenue of their Computing Solutions division it’s not nearly large enough to offset the losses AMD has run there.

AMD Q3 2012 Graphics Division Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $342M $367M $403M
Operating Income $18M $31M $12M

With all of that in mind, as bad as AMD’s Q3 was, much like Intel their projections are for Q4 to be even worse. Unlike Intel AMD doesn’t provide gross margin guidance, but for their revenue guidance they are predicting a further 9% (+/- 4%) decline in revenue.

This brings us to perhaps the most depressing news of the day: more layoffs. As part of their restructuring plan to return to profitability, AMD will be laying off nearly 15% of its workforce in Q4. They expect to take an $80M charge on this for severance payments, in return for $190M in projected savings in 2013. AMD is being intentionally vague about where these layoffs will come from, and it’s entirely possible they haven't completely figured that out at this time, so at this point it’s impossible to say if this will primarily hit one division (e.g. GPUs) or if it will be spread around all of AMD’s major divisions.

The layoffs are coming as part of a greater restructuring for the company, which will see them accelerating their previously announced shift away from the PC market in favor of mobile, servers, and semi-custom embedded chips. As the PC market continues to weaken – and AMD expects it to remain weak for several more quarters – they will be speeding up this transition in order to derive more of their revenue from non-PC sources sooner. Ultimately AMD wants to be in a position where 40-50% of their revenue comes from these fast-growing markets, with a specific goal of 20% of their revenue coming from semi-custom embedded APUs by Q4 of 2013.

To get there AMD will be simplifying their development cycles and increasing their focus on building reusable IP blocks, in essence transitioning to building their APUs in a more SoC-like fashion. AMD has been very careful to reiterate that they’re still an engineering company, and that graphics in particular are a cornerstone of the company. But much like the vague nature of the layoffs they are not making it clear what projects and products are being deprioritized or discontinued in order to achieve this simplification. What is clear is right now is that AMD will be reusing more IP and designs when they can to avoid having to undertake costly research and development.

Finally, AMD has also spent a bit of time talking about 2013 and beyond. On a financial side of things AMD’s goal is to get their operating costs to the point where a quarterly revenue of 1.3B would be their break-even point, which is part of AMD’s attempt to “reset” the company to survive on what would ultimately be lower margins. Meanwhile on the product side of things, silicon for Kabini (their 28nm Brazos replacement) is already back and AMD is working on a H1 2013 launch for that. As it stands nearly 85% of AMD’s current business is focused on the “legacy” PC market, so AMD is looking to shift into high margin, fast growing markets like tablets as soon as possible, which is where products like Kabini will take them.

POST A COMMENT

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • Vini - Sunday, October 21, 2012 - link

    That must a poor attempt at a joke? What does Value make? Ermm Numbers? Don't bother you wont find it very inspiring they are not Microsoft and they are puny in comparison. Even MS sees the need to dive into the ARM market because they see the bigger picture. You are probably a benching enthusiast in denial. The market wont miss benching enthusiasts. The real enthusiasts are the ones who are interested in tech in general not in pointless number fads. Reply
  • jjj - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    AMD does say "a workforce reduction and site consolidations. " and it's not that hard to figure out what sites matter less to them or need to be closer to home. Reply
  • toyotabedzrock - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    Compared to the recent past that is a small loss for them. Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link


    Uhh....wow maybe wall street should hire you to help pump stock.

    The sad and the bad of it is after the major unprecedented workforce hacking over and over again, here comes another 15% AXE job !

    Now, if you add up all the recent axings and this one hanging over the heads now, you've got an ASTOUNDING amount of absolute inefficiency, or a dangerously shrinking company.

    I believe it's the latter, the former appears to be managerial incompetence, poor internal structure, and criminality.
    Reply
  • HOODY - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    2 words for you AMD that bear some responsibility for your loss's.

    "DRIVER SUPPORT" !!!!

    (does "Enduro" come to mind?)
    Reply
  • zilexa - Monday, October 22, 2012 - link

    Can any expert please explain this to me:

    AMD "released" and showed the Brazos E2-1800 for desktops over 6 months ago. Sapphire even showed us a mITX board. It's now almost end of the year and this product is not available.
    Why spend money showing such a product so early? The effect is completely gone.

    Also.. they even have Desktop Trinities, showed months ago but still not available.

    Even if you still have LLano's packed up and need to sell those first, AMD clearly doesn't have a clue how to prepare a market for a new product.

    I have been waiting on a replacement for my 780G HTPC, should be completely silent. A Brazos is my *only* option then.. since Intel alternatives are slower and have other downsides. But damn.. had I known this, I would have bought the E-450 earlier this year.. the E2-1800 was already announced and should arrive in Q2.. yeah right.

    I used to be a big AMD fan, and I really dont care their CPUs dont match with Core i7, a Core i3/i5 is more then enough for 90% of the mainstream market. So AMD can snoop away a big market share. But damn they have become so stupid with their marketing timings..

    Still waiting for a mITX E2-1800 board..
    Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Since the "opressed" and loser company gets all the crybaby tears, we won't hear an answer that has any sense when it comes to your question.

    I can certainly give my answer though. AMD products are messes, and when they're big messes, it takes forever for their tiny stupid staffs and people to straighten it out enough that they can launch their beta crap into the market.

    So obviously, their crap is mired in internal crashes, incompatibilities, no certified drivers, BSOD's, and thus, no partner is going to roll out the trash until the garbage only stinks so much, and they can line up a strategy for having all the reviewers cover up the barfing pig sty enough so that the fanboys go whack and buy it, then live with the enedless troubles telling themselves they didn't do so bad and boy are they ever a good techie after crunching through the endless days of fixes that still leave the bleeding pile not quite ready to be released.

    On the upside, a few years down the road, when it's old and slow and incapable, amd will have finally patched it enough that it will work, for the most part... kind of, most of the time, for most of those things it was originally bought for, but none of the new stuff that has hit in the years since.

    Every once in a while they shatter that broken mold and press out a beauty, like the K6-2 and 64X2, but .... that beauty is long overdue...
    Reply
  • Mishera - Monday, October 22, 2012 - link

    Ryan I thought tablets were a low margin business?

    Biggest problem at Amd is still probably stability. Not good for business when you have CEOs cycling through every few years. It was a big mistake to get rid of Dirk Meyer. Having said that, Amd has a couple of outs, but the biggest one is almost totally dependent on Microsoft. Microsoft is moving to tablets, but because they don't want to put their foot down on x86 or Arm most vendors are slowly shifting to Arm based systems. Worse, Msoft seemed to totally ignore Amd for an Intel solution instead for their surface. Probably big mistake for both of them (you could have a tablet priced x86 pc...).

    The other is becoming a primarily graphics company. It's a growing industry, especially with trends like 3D printing and cloud, but they are a bit behind Nvidia on this one (and Nvidia has the mind share right now).

    Overall they need money. At this point you just can't compete in any of these industries unless you can create viable solutions. That was the whole reason they sold Imageon.
    Reply
  • melgross - Monday, October 22, 2012 - link

    I'm sorry that I didn't get to read all the comments first. It's always interesting. But this is not the first time that AMD has had layoffs to become a break even company at some point of sales. Doing that just shows that they are not expecting to be competitive. Competitiveness is when you attempt, at least, to better the competition, and grow into more marketshare. It's looks like they are just trying to keep their heads above water.

    But each time this happens, they become less competitive. What really worries me this time is their intention to reuse components in an effort to cut back in R&D. Once that happens, they will fall behind further. It's an impossible situation. The difficulty is that Intel's R&D equals all of AMD's sales right now. In order to be competitive, to need to equal what the competition is doing in R&D. Not necessarily in equal spending all round, but in the areas in which you need to compete the most. If AMD feels that they won't need to do that in SoC's, for example, as one area mentioned, they will be surprised. This is the product category that is advancing the most, and the quickest. Performance may double each year for the next two to three years. As this will be a new area for them, how do they think they can equal what's out now, much less outperform next year, and the year after that?

    I'm concerned that this is their last gasp. It may take several more years, but if things don't improve in a big way soon, they will be on their way out.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now