Physical Architecture

The physical architecture of Titan is just as interesting as the high level core and transistor counts. I mentioned earlier that Titan is built from 200 cabinets. Inside each cabinets are Cray XK7 boards, each of which has four AMD G34 sockets and four PCIe slots. These aren't standard desktop PCIe slots, but rather much smaller SXM slots. The K20s NVIDIA sells to Cray come on little SXM cards without frivolous features like display outputs. The SXM form factor is similar to the MXM form factor used in some notebooks.

There's no way around it. ORNL techs had to install 18,688 CPUs and GPUs over the past few weeks in order to get Titan up and running. Around 10 of the formerly-Jaguar cabinets had these new XK boards but were using Fermi GPUs. I got to witness one of the older boards get upgraded to K20. The process isn't all that different from what you'd see in a desktop: remove screws, remove old card, install new card, replace screws. The form factor and scale of installation are obviously very different, but the basic premise remains.

As with all computer components, there's no guarantee that every single chip and card is going to work. When you're dealing with over 18,000 computers as a part of a single entity, there are bound to be failures. All of the compute nodes go through testing, and faulty hardware swapped out, before the upgrade is technically complete.

OS & Software

Titan runs the Cray Linux Environment, which is based on SUSE 11. The OS has to be hardened and modified for operation on such a large scale. In order to prevent serialization caused by interrupts, Cray takes some of the cores and uses them to run all of the OS tasks so that applications running elsewhere aren't interrupted by the OS.

Jobs are batch scheduled on Titan using Moab and Torque.

AMD CPUs and NVIDIA GPUs

If you're curious about why Titan uses Opterons, the explanation is actually pretty simple. Titan is a large installation of Cray XK7 cabinets, so CPU support is actually defined by Cray. Back in 2005 when Jaguar made its debut, AMD's Opterons were superior to the Intel Xeon alternative. The evolution of Cray's XT/XK lines simply stemmed from that point, with Opteron being the supported CPU of choice.

The GPU decision was just as simple. NVIDIA has been focusing on non-gaming compute applications for its GPUs for years now. The decision to partner with NVIDIA on the Titan project was made around 3 years ago. At the time, AMD didn't have a competitive GPU compute roadmap. If you remember back to our first Fermi architecture article from back in 2009, I wrote the following:

"By adding support for ECC, enabling C++ and easier Visual Studio integration, NVIDIA believes that Fermi will open its Tesla business up to a group of clients that would previously not so much as speak to NVIDIA. ECC is the killer feature there."

At the time I didn't know it, but ORNL was one of those clients. With almost 19,000 GPUs, errors are bound to happen. Having ECC support was a must have for GPU enabled Jaguar and Titan compute nodes. The ORNL folks tell me that CUDA was also a big selling point for NVIDIA.

Finally, some of the new features specific to K20/GK110 (e.g. Hyper Q and GPU Direct) made Kepler the right point to go all-in with GPU compute.

Power Delivery & Cooling

Titan's cabinets require 480V input to reduce overall cable thickness compared to standard 208V cabling. Total power consumption for Titan should be around 9 megawatts under full load and around 7 megawatts during typical use. The building that Titan is housed in has over 25 megawatts of power delivered to it.

In the event of a power failure there's no cost effective way to keep the compute portion of Titan up and running (remember, 9 megawatts), but you still want IO and networking operational. Flywheel based UPSes kick in, in the event of a power interruption. They can power Titan's network and IO for long enough to give diesel generators time to come on line.

The cabinets themselves are air cooled, however the air itself is chilled using liquid cooling before entering the cabinet. ORNL has over 6600 tons of cooling capacity just to keep the recirculated air going into these cabinets cool.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Applying for Time on Titan & Supercomputing Applications
Comments Locked

130 Comments

View All Comments

  • Death666Angel - Thursday, November 8, 2012 - link

    When they built this, the Intel stuff wasn't better than AMDs. And now they already have all this hardware which is tuned for the AMD stuff. Wouldn't make sense to update to Intel this time.
  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, November 10, 2012 - link

    Wouldn't make sense only because nVidia is smoking the daylights out of the barely over 2Pflops from crap AMD cpus, adding multiple DOZENS of Pflops.

    So neither Intel nor AMD can hang.
  • wwwcd - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Moore's law will be broken...at basement and the above ;)
  • tomek1984 - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Thus even four years since the release of the original Crysis, “but can it run Crysis?” is still an important question, and the answer is finally "yes, it can" LOL
  • davegraham - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Anand,

    you missed a huge data item in your article. by saying it's "just a bunch of SATA drives" you completely glossed over the WAY those SATA drives are organized (by DDN). DDN uses a wide/shallow bus topology to keep parallel writes going to the drives organized and processed in a VERY optimal manner. consequently, they're able to ingest at over 6GB/s per head...now, multiply that across the requirements from ORNL and you can see why this becomes important.

    next time, don't just skip over it. ;)

    D
  • webmastir - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    9 million $ a year to power it? Yikes.

    Either way, I'm glad to have this in my state :)
  • mikato - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Lots of hydroelectric in Tennessee :)
  • bill.rookard - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    I just can't imagine trying to build a program that scales up to that kind of performance, it's just staggering.

    That being said, I have this little program I'd like to run on it... called... SkyNet....
  • mfenn - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    I want more coverage of big iron! Hope you talk about it in depth on the podcast as well.
  • harezzebra - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Hi Anand,

    please do a indepth virtualization review, as you did earlier. your review is must for latest virtualization offerings from vmware, microsoft and citrix for unbiased decision making.

    regards
    harsh

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now