General Performance Metrics

We are not going to compare our build with full-blown desktop solutions. Instead, we will see how the unit stacks up to some of the low power offerings that have graced our labs. Some of the benchmarks have been run for the first time, and hence, not all benchmarks are available for all units. In addition, we are only presenting benchmark results for our build under Windows 8.

Windows Performance Index

This metric is often considered meaningless, but we feel it serves as an indicator of what could be the bottleneck in a system. On Windows 8, systems can score up to 9.9 on this metric, compared to 7.9 on Windows 7.

Given that we have equipped the system with SSDs and the RAM runs at the prescribed maximum of 1600 MHz, it is no surprise that the HD 4000 GPU is responsible for a score of 4.7 for the system.

Futuremark Benchmarks

Futuremark PCMark 7

Futuremark 3DMark Vantage

Futuremark 3DMark11

Futuremark 3DMark06

Miscellaneous Benchmarks

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R11.5

Starting with this review, we are going to utilize Graysky's x264 Benchmark v5.0 for testing out x264 encoding performance. Instead of just presenting benchmarks for our build alone, we took the opportunity to run the benchmark on two HTPC units we reviewed earlier.

Video Encoding - x264 v5.0 64b

Video Encoding - x264 v5.0 64b

There are no surprises in the benchmarks, with the CPU performance befitting a 55W TDP unit. The absence of four physical cores does hurt it against the i7-based units in the above graphs (and would have showed in the x264 benchmark too, if we had run it on a i7-based system). However, this is not a concern for most HTPC workloads.

 

Introduction Network Streaming Performance - Netflix
POST A COMMENT

137 Comments

View All Comments

  • NeBlackCat - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    You're describing a media server there mate, not an HTPC. We're about at the point now where an HTPC needs to be nothing but a cheap networked ARM box. Reply
  • truprecht - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    Raspberry Pi? Not quite there yet... maybe next gen. Reply
  • The12pAc - Tuesday, January 22, 2013 - link

    Was SOOO close to getting on last weekend, just to mess around with..... Cool idea. Reply
  • Golgatha - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    Not to mention Cinavia will eventually make your ripped media streaming life a living hell Fx1. Enjoy not being able to tinker with the hardware and software. Also, good luck getting updates for all those apps once Panasonic exits the market. Microsoft and open source programs; not going out of the market anytime soon. Reply
  • Fx1 - Tuesday, January 22, 2013 - link

    No Cinavia on Panasonic. I am literally playing Blu rays off a HDD. Reply
  • dcaxax - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    A) The scaling capabilities of your TV are what they are. I'm sure they're quite OK and I'm sure they don't come close to MadVR, but of course if youre happy that's all that counts.\

    B) Your TV doesn't manage and play all your media including your m4a's, Flac CD Rips etc, and if it does I'm sure the quality is awful unless iof it bitstreams which is unlikely.

    C) It also doesn't play any non-typical audio/video formats. Maybe you don't care about that but others do.

    D) Your TV may or may not show you your photos or give you skype or any bunch of other things that an HTPC does.

    E) Others have made the point about DVR capabilities better.

    F) Regardless of any of the above the UI on your TV doesn't come close to XBMC which itself doesn't come close to MediaBrowser (WMC plug-in)

    HTPC's were never about playing pirated content. They are intended to provide a single hub for all digital content.
    The fact that you are happy with your TV doing that for you, means that you have no need not bother with articles like this. Or indeed post on them.
    Reply
  • Fx1 - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    The TV has a dual core ARM CPU which seems to get the job done and the best 2D image money can buy. I really only try and use HD content.

    When i download my content i have enough choice between x264 Divx and other popular formats. If i really need to use an odd format any Phone or laptop or PC can stream directly to the TV via DNLA and realtime encode.

    Skype, Youtube Netflix and other stuff is baked right into the TV with even a store to buy games.

    My Galaxy S3 can use an app to share video pictures and Web pages direct to the TV and the TV can use these features without the phone too. I can play a HD movie directly off my phone in 2 clicks with the picture being perfectly good as i had used the HDD.

    Im sure you can find stuff that i cant do that you can do on a HTPC but lets face it the costs are adding up and for what?
    Reply
  • jabber - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    Kind of agree with you there. I used to know quite a few folks that ran HTPC boxes but over the past few years they have all got rid of them and just switched to off the shelf options instead.

    I even had a go back in the day but more trouble than it was worth.

    This is UK based too.
    Reply
  • WeaselITB - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    How do you watch independent or third-party shows on websites NOT on YouTube or Netflix? PBS documentaries, indy web-original content, etc.

    You state that you use a phone/laptop/PC to stream via DNLA ... well, then what's the point of your super-TV when you can have a dumb TV and an HTPC and accomplish everything without needing to stream off another box? If a vast majority of the online content you watch is via Netflix/YouTube, then sure, I'll bet that the super-TV works great. If it isn't (as is my case), then a separate HTPC is the better bet.

    -Weasel
    Reply
  • dcaxax - Tuesday, January 22, 2013 - link

    Also, not everyone has a super smart TV. I have a 55" Sony series 9 (hx923). It's one of the best TVs money can buy (especially for may visual tastes), but it's smart platform sucks.

    I don't like to depend on a dumb machine which is what I consider TV's for things I can do 10 times better on a PC. and I've not seen a single "smart tv" platform that didn't suck monkey balls as far as usability, speed and interface design...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now