Snapdragon 600 - CPU Performance

With the low level look at Krait 300 out of the way, let's see how the One fares in our standard suite of Android based CPU tests.

We'll start with SunSpider 0.9.1, our trusty javascript performance test. 

Despite the low level improvements, HTC's One here doesn't offer any advantage over the APQ8064 based flagships from last year. I suspect what we're seeing here are limits of software/browser optimizations on the One rather than a conclusion about the performance of its hardware.

SunSpider Javascript Benchmark 0.9.1 - Stock Browser

Google Octane Benchmark v1

The One's standings improve as we look at Google's Octane test, effectively tying the performance of the Atom based Motorola RAZR i. The Exynos 4412 based Galaxy Note 2 continues to perform very well here, despite being built on older Cortex A9 hardware running at a slightly lower clock frequency.

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark

Kraken is likely the least optimized for javascript benchmark we have in our suite, which makes it (temporarily) interesting. There's also the fact that the benchmark is quite large and takes a while to run on all platforms, giving us some more useful results. Here the One is second only to the Cortex A15 based Nexus 10 tablet, which should be faster given its higher TDP and much beefier microarchitecture. Otherwise the One is the fastest Android device we've tested here.

BrowserMark 2.0

BrowserMark 2.0 goes back to having the GNote 2 on top in the phone space, nearly equalling the performance of the Nexus 10. The data is very strange but I don't have a good explanation for it, other than that we really need to move away from js based benchmarks as soon as good ones are available. The BrowserMark 2.0 performance of the One looks very similar to the iPhone 5.

Our two Vellamo benchmarks both show the One doing very well. In the HTML5 test, the One puts everything else to shame - including the old APQ8064 based Droid DNA and the Galaxy Note 2. The Qualcomm comparison is the more interesting as it echoes some of what we saw in the microbenchmarks - take into account the clock speed difference and you're looking at a 22% improvement in performance due to the new Krait 300 cores.

Vellamo Benchmark - 2.0

The Vellamo Metal score shows a smaller overall performance advantage (~11% if you take into account the clock speed difference), but still a measurable one nonetheless. Here we also see the Nexus 10 perform as expected:

Vellamo Benchmark - 2.0

Subjectively, the new Snapdragon 600 platform is appreciably quicker than the previous generation S4 Pro. The margin of improvement will really depend on the application you're using, but in terms of responsiveness the HTC One is among the best out today. The real question is how Qualcomm's latest will compare once Cortex A15 based SoCs begin shipping in phones, not just from a performance standpoint but taking into account power as well.

 

The One: Powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 600 Snapdragon 600 - GPU Performance
POST A COMMENT

626 Comments

View All Comments

  • jbrandonf - Tuesday, April 09, 2013 - link

    I don't think you know how it works but carrier reps receive no additional money for selling a specific platform. -ex carrier rep Reply
  • bnathan - Wednesday, April 10, 2013 - link

    Maybe with your one carrier in your one country but most carriers offer commissions for selling handsets and plans. The carriers I have dealings with they ALL offer commissions as incentives to sell and the Iphone gives the lowest commission to sales people as there is no money in Apple products. Sell and Iphone and the payment (handset subsidy) barely covers the cost of giving the handset away for free with the plan, sell Android or WP8 and the payment covers the handset and you get enough to make a tidy sum of money. The only saving grace to sell an Iphone is that you can just be an order taker there is no selling involved so you can do the contract and move onto the next customer hence higher numbers to make the same commission and the fact there is so many add ons which you can add to an iphone. Walk into any shop and they will have 100+ Iphone accessories and a couple for each Android handset if any. The only people who make money out of Apple products is Apple. Reply
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, April 30, 2013 - link

    A ridiculous comment. Apples cost are only a little higher than the rest and they make more from android because they can load up the devices with their garbage software. All the developers of iOS devices, accessory makers. People who produce using would find your comments ignorant and amusing. Compare that to the meager Android aftermarket and developer revenues. Not even close. Reply
  • Thud2 - Sunday, April 14, 2013 - link

    He didn't say "Carrier Rep" Reply
  • Thud2 - Sunday, April 14, 2013 - link

    The OP I mean. Reply
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, April 30, 2013 - link

    Either you weren't really a carrier rep or you are lying. Reply
  • TinaE - Sunday, April 14, 2013 - link

    Me too. I ordered today at the ATT store and received the media link for free. Reply
  • sjain - Sunday, April 07, 2013 - link

    Just pre-ordered on the AT&T website and got my free media link. I am an existing customer so am surprised at your comment. They clearly spell out that you have to add the media link manually and it shows up as $0.00 in your cart. Reply
  • Sabresiberian - Sunday, April 07, 2013 - link

    The thing that stops me from jumping off the Win 8 phone ship is that I think MS is just beginning to get serious about smart phones. The idea of a Surface Pro Smart phone, with its VaporMg body and full-blown Win8 OS, isn't all that far-fetched, and until MS proves they are never going to make such a thing, I'll be waiting for it. :) Reply
  • kyuu - Sunday, April 07, 2013 - link

    Full Win8 on a smartphone isn't going to happen, and I'm not sure why you'd *want* it in the first place. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now