A few days ago we reported that Seagate would stop selling 7200 RPM 2.5” hard drives by the end of the year. Now we know why. Seagate will continue to offer 5400 RPM 2.5” drives, but if you want more performance without diving into the performance/capacity tradeoffs of an SSD Seagate will offer you its 3rd generation solid state hybrid drive (SSHD).

Once sold under the Momentus XT brand, the 3rd gen hybrid drives will simply be sold under the SSHD moniker. As Seagate alluded to many times in the past, we’ll also be getting a 3.5” hybrid drive as well. The two families will simply be called the Seagate Laptop SSHD and Seagate Desktop SSHD.

While both families will have many members, at launch we’ll see the following:

Seagate SSHD Lineup 1H 2013
  Capacity Form Factor Platters Speed NAND Price
Seagate Laptop SSHD 500GB 2.5" 7mm 1 5400 RPM 8GB MLC $79
Seagate Laptop SSHD 1TB 2.5" 9.5mm 2 5400 RPM 8GB MLC $99
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB 3.5" 1 7200 RPM 8GB MLC $99
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB 3.5" 2 7200 RPM 8GB MLC $149

All of the drives use a standard SATA interface, and all of them feature 8GB of MLC NAND (with a small portion of the NAND set aside for use in SLC mode, similar to SanDisk’s nCache). This is a disappointingly small amount of NAND, however Seagate hinted at future, higher performance versions shipping with somewhere around 32GB of NAND. As we found in our investigation of Apple’s Fusion Drive, the ideal number is likely somewhere in the 128GB - 256GB range but that puts you in a very different price class.

The benefit of using only 8GB of NAND is that Seagate is able to keep prices very low. Both Laptop and Desktop SSHDs are expected to carry around a $15 - $20 price premium over competing 7200RPM alternatives.

The NAND mostly acts as a read cache, although this time around Seagate claims it will be able to cache some writes. Seagate is understandably sensitive to writing tons of data to the NAND since it’s only an 8GB MLC device, but endurance shouldn’t be too much of a problem to navigate around with good firmware. There’s no data separation, everything that is written to NAND also exists on the hard drive - although it’s not clear if that write happens in tandem or sequentially.

Seagate is particularly proud of their very low time to use performance with the new SSHDs. Apparently Seagate aggressively tuned its algorithms to cache roughly all accesses that happen within the first minute of power on.

Although I’m not very excited about the performance of these drives compared to SSDs, their low price should make Seagate’s SSHDs an obvious choice compared to a traditional hard drive. The fact that we’ll get both 2.5” and 3.5” SSHDs is nice since many SSD users on the desktop are still consumers of mechanical drives as well. Personally I’m not sure how much I’d benefit from using Seagate’s Desktop SSHDs in my RAID array since I mostly do large block sequential transfers (which would be uncached) to/from the array. For gamers or folks who have an SSD that’s smaller than their total application footprint these SSHDs might be compelling.

When I first reviewed the Momentus XT I concluded “There's no reason for any performance oriented mechanical drive to ship without at least some small amount of NAND on board.” Three years later, it looks like that vision has finally come to be.

POST A COMMENT

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • Notmyusualid - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Yes, I'm keeping score. And agree with everything you've said.

    I had the 500GB XT with SLC nand, and it was w o n d e r f u l.

    Why they are stepping backwards, is hard to fathom.
    Reply
  • vectorm12 - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    Too bad about this since the 7200.5 disks are the only ones I've found that work flawlessly in RAID on Adaptec controllers.

    Currently I've got eight of them running in raid 6 for datastorage on my workstation.

    Great little drives as they are both reasonably quiet and don't require much in the way of cooling.

    Hopefully Seagate will make the new models RAID-compliant but I'm not holding my breath.
    Reply
  • kyuu - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    The Momentus XTs worked fine in RAID. Why would these be any different? Unless there's something special about your Adaptech controller? Reply
  • dgingeri - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    $149 for a 2TB drive with 8GB of flash cache? That's a gyp. I can get a 2TB Seagate drive for $90 and a 32GB SSD for $40-50 and have 4 times the cache. Granted, this would be workable on more systems than the separate drive setup, but those other systems wouldn't even be available with an expensive drive like this. They need at least 32GB of flash cache at that price point. Reply
  • kyuu - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    These are MSRPs, not necessarily what you'll see them selling for at retail. You could always find the Momentus XTs for well below their MSRPs, unless you didn't bother to check around. Reply
  • MadMan007 - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    It must bother HDD makers that their regular spinny drives can last for years and years. This way, once the NAND wears out the drive will 'fail' and you'll have to get a new one. Brilliantly nefarious plan, Seagate! Reply
  • tipoo - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    On the last drives the drive would just segment off the worn out NAND and continue to function as a regular hard drive if absolutely none was less. The spinning disk would likely die before that happened though. Reply
  • Mr Perfect - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    He was all busy hating on NAND and now look, you ruined it. I hope you're happy, Mister Factual. XD Reply
  • flyingpants - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    Except you have it backwards.. all spinning hard drives will eventually break, most of them within about 5 years. SSDs on the other hand do not out of write capacity for like decades. Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 05, 2013 - link

    Flash cells have an ~1 decade life span independent of being written too many times. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now