The Haswell Review: Intel Core i7-4770K & i5-4670K Tested
by Anand Lal Shimpi on June 1, 2013 10:00 AM ESTCPU Performance: Going Even Further Back
If you want specific comparisons to other CPUs, all of the Haswell data is in Bench. I took the liberty of putting together a few charts comparing the 4770K to some key older parts to put its performance in perspective.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
210 Comments
View All Comments
JDG1980 - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
Those tests you linked are purely synthetic benchmarks. Has anyone found a significant real-world application where Haswell is slower than SB/IB at the same clock speed?krumme - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
Has anyone found a significal real-world application where Haswell matter?smilingcrow - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
Has anyone found a significant real-world comment from you that matters?rupert3k - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
*high fives*Aditya211935 - Sunday, June 2, 2013 - link
http://www.techoftomorrow.com/2013/pc/intel-haswel...This One is pretty nice.
Altough the list of games given there is a bit shallow but still it gives you a general idea.
jeffkibuule - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
Haswell isn't just about the CPU, it's about the entire platform of chips, even the tiny ones on the motherboard no one really cares about. And I'm not sure what you were expecting in terms of performance gains, as there isn't any competition in the desktop arena for it to be worth pushing out 20-25% gains (and certainly not on a yearly basis).As far as active power goes, the entire point of a modern CPU architecture is to "hurry up and go to sleep (HUGS)". Faster you go to idle and the better idle performance you have, the better battery life you get because lets face it, unless you're encoding a video or playing a game, your CPU spends most of its idling doing nothing.
B3an - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
You're right. If anyone is to be blamed for the slight performance increase of Haswell, it's AMD. If AMD could actually compete on performance we would be seeing more gains with Haswell, and maybe FINALLY more than 4 cores on mainstream Intel platforms.DeadlyRicochet - Tuesday, June 4, 2013 - link
And I wonder how successful AMD would have been if Intel never stole their revenue (when AMD chips were faster than Intel, around 2006) by making under the table deals with OEMs to use Intel only CPUs.deepblue08 - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
I disagree somewhat. Especially with the fact that you think idle power consumption is unimportant. Keep in mind, that at least half of the time, when you are working, browsing the net, your cpu is in fact idle. So an improvement in idle performance consumption is a big deal imo.Hector2 - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
You've got it all wrong. Haswell won't be going up against ARM in tablets. Don't look for it in smartphones either ! LOL A Haswell i7 is serious overkill for those markets. ARM won't be getting into the serious laptop & PC market soon either --- they just can't compete well with Intel there. Intel is targeting their smaller & less power-hungry Atoms for the phone & tablet markets (surely you know this ?) that are driven by low power requirements. The press just leaked that Samsung's new Galaxy Tab 3 will have dual core Clover Trail+ Atoms