Battery Life

I didn’t get my hands on the Haswell S7 until a few hours after I landed in Taipei. My hotel’s in-room internet was throttled to around 2.5Mbps, which wasn’t enough bandwidth to reliably run our web browsing battery life tests. Luckily, I had my review copy of PCMark 8 on hand with its new built in battery life tests. I asked Jarred to run comparison data on the Ivy Bridge S7.

We had time to perform multiple runs on two of the tests: Home and Creative.

From the PCMark 8 Technical Guide:

The PCMark 8 Home benchmark test includes a set of workloads that reflect common tasks and activities performed by a typical person at home. These workloads generally have low computational requirements making the PCMark 8 Home benchmark suitable for testing the performance of low-cost tablets, notebooks and desktops.

The PCMark 8 Home benchmark test contains the following workloads: Web Browsing, Writing, Casual Gaming, Photo Editing and Video Chat.

The PCMark 8 Creative benchmark test includes a set of workloads that reflect tasks and activities typical of more advanced home computer users. With more demanding requirements than the Home benchmark, the PCMark 8 Creative test is suitable for testing the performance of mid-range computer systems. Your system must have a GPU with full DirectX 11 support in order to run all the workloads in the PCMark 8 Creative benchmark.

The PCMark 8 Creative benchmark test contains the following workloads: Web Browsing, Photo Editing, Batch Photo Editing, Video Editing, Media to Go, Mainstream Gaming and Group Video Chat.

As always, I calibrated both displays to the same brightness (200 nits). In the case of the Haswell based S7, I disabled all additional display power saving options in the Intel driver. Keeping in mind the new S7 has a 33% larger battery, I’m presenting both absolute battery life numbers as well as minutes per Wh for normalized comparisons.

The PCMark 8 Home battery life test is the lighter of the two, and thus has the best chance of showing peak improvement on Haswell. The results are very good:

PCMark 8 Battery Life
  PCMark 8 Home PCMark 8 Home (Normalized) PCMark 8 Creative PCMark 8 Creative (Normalized)
Acer Aspire S7-391 (Core i7-3517U) 2.83 hours 4.857 mins/Wh 3.35 hours 5.743 mins/Wh
Acer Aspire S7-392 (Core i7-4500U) 5.2 hours 6.783 mins/Wh 5.12 hours 6.674 mins/Wh
Haswell Advantage   39.6%   16.2%

In both benchmarks, Haswell ULT delivers 11 - 14% better performance and substantially longer battery life. Normalized for battery capacity, Haswell ULT offers 16% better battery life in the Creative test and almost 40% better battery life in the Home test. Note that the performance advantage pretty much disappears once we move to the Balanced power profile with the laptop connected to the wall.

PCMark 8 Performance
  PCMark 8 Home (Power Saver) PCMark 8 Home (Balanced) PCMark 8 Creative (Power Saver) PCMark 8 Creative (Balanced)
Acer Aspire S7-391 (Core i7-3517U) 1595 2694 1391 2508
Acer Aspire S7-392 (Core i7-4500U) 1777 2832 1583 2553
Haswell Advantage 11.4% 5.1% 13.8% 1.8%

Update: I made it back to the US, equipped with decent internet speeds, I was able to run our light 2013 web browsing battery life test. The increase in battery life is tremendous:

Battery Life 2013 - Light

The new S7 delivers over 2x the battery life of the old model. Normalizing for battery capacity, the improvement due to Haswell is 57.5%. These results track perfectly with what we saw in PCMark 8. Workloads with greater idle time will show the biggest improvement in battery life thanks to Haswell ULT.

 

The Test System and Haswell ULT SKUs CPU Performance
Comments Locked

87 Comments

View All Comments

  • broccauley - Tuesday, June 11, 2013 - link

    Were Acer not known for their "Timeline" series of laptops which were known for groundbreaking battery life?
  • smilingcrow - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    Apple are claiming dramatically improved battery life.
  • deeps6x - Sunday, July 14, 2013 - link

    I just don't get why Intel caved to MS pressure and made touchscreen a requirement for Haswell. Everyone I know who does image editing insists on doing it on a matte screen.

    Metro was a huge mistake.

    Gaah, just too pissed about this to make a coherent comment.

    I want haswell with a matte screen and 13 and 15 inch 'ultrabook' size options. I guess manufacturers will just have to invent some new name to call their matte screen ultrabooks. Perhaps just call them 'laptops' and say screw you and your goof ass naming rules Intel.
  • Xenon14 - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    It would be useful to see productivity and multithreaded benchmarks like Excel and Fritz. It'd be nice if you provide a few charts with higher TDP Cpu's so we can see the relative performance differences.
  • Synaesthesia - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    Wow Anand you delivered! Once again such an in-depth analysis of EVERYTHING relevant to the platform. Nowhere else can I find this information!
  • uditrana - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    Except for one thing. How did they change the backlighting in the S7. I am really interested in knowing.
  • n13L5 - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    yeah, they did a good job doing that on location and before anyone else :D
  • meacupla - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    That's great news.

    Now, I can't wait to see it in surface pro.
  • B3an - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    Yeah Surface Pro with one of these, in a thinner and lighter design (should be possible now) with Windows 8.1 = ultimate device.
  • MrSpadge - Monday, June 10, 2013 - link

    Or the Thinkpad Helix!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now