Acer sent along word today that their S7 Ultrabook, now updated with Haswell internals, is available for order. At present, Acer lists two different models; as usual, the less expensive model includes a Core i5 processor and a 128GB SSD, and the high-end model upgrades the CPU to a Core i7 processor and includes a 256GB SSD. Thankfully, both come with 8GB memory and a 1920x1080 IPS touchscreen display. Anand previewed performance of the Acer S7 around the time of the Haswell launch, but it was prerelease hardware. We don’t expect performance to have changed much, but battery life should be better judging by what we’ve seen of other Haswell offerings. Here’s the full rundown of the specifications for the two models.

Acer S7 Haswell Ultrabook Specifications
Model S7-392-6832 (NX.MBKAA.008) S7-392-9890 (NX.MBKAA.009)
Processor Intel Core i5-4200U
(Dual-core 1.6-2.6GHz, 3MB L3, 22nm, 15W)
Intel Core i7-4500U
(Dual-core 1.8-3.0GHz, 4MB L3, 22nm, 15W)
Chipset H87 (?)
Memory 8GB (2x4GB onboard)
Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4400
(20 EUs at 200-1000MHz)
Intel HD Graphics 4400
(20 EUs at 200-1100MHz)
Display 13.3" Glossy IPS 1080p (1920x1080)
Storage 128GB (2x64GB RAID 0) SSD 256GB (2x128GB RAID 0) SSD
Optical Drive N/A
Networking 802.11n WiFi (Intel Advanced-N 7260)
(Dual-band 2x2:2 300Mbps capable)
Bluetooth 4.0 + HS (Intel)
Audio Realtek HD
Stereo Speakers
Headset combo jack
Battery/Power 4-cell, ~7.32V, 6280mAh, 46Wh
65W Max AC Adapter
Front Side N/A
Left Side Power Button
Headphone/Microphone jack
Mini-HDMI
AC Power Connection
Right Side Memory Card Reader
1 x USB 3.0
1 x USB 3.0 (Powered when sleeping)
Back Side N/A (Exhaust vent located on bottom)
Operating System Windows 8 64-bit
Dimensions 12.7" x 8.8" x 0.5" (WxDxH)
(323mm x 224mm x 12.7mm)
Weight 2.87 lbs (1.3kg)
Extras HD Webcam
67-Key Backlit Keyboard
Flash reader (MMC /SD)
Pricing MSRP: $1450
Online: $1450
MSRP: $1700
Online: $1650

In terms of the exterior design, as far as I can tell nothing has changed – for better or for worse – so most of what we said in our earlier Ivy Bridge S7 review still applies. That means you still get a funky keyboard that’s missing the top row of function keys, and there’s not a whole lot of key travel either. Still, it’s an extremely thin and attractive design overall, and just because the exterior didn’t change doesn’t mean that nothing else has improved.

Besides the new Haswell processors, the new S7-392 series Ultrabooks come with 8GB of memory now, shoring up one of the weak spots. The wireless solution has also been updated to Intel’s Advanced-N 7260; it would have been great to get 802.11ac, so really the change from a Qualcomm/Atheros 2x2:2 dual-band solution to the new Intel equivalent isn’t likely to radically alter WiFi performance. Finally, the battery received an upgrade capacity as well, making the new S7 even more portable than before. In Anand’s testing, the new S7 delivered just over seven hours of useful battery life (compared to only four hours on the earlier model).

Pricing remains roughly the same as before, unfortunately, so even though the new model is definitely better than previous model, we’re not sure how many people are willing to fork over $1400-$1700 for a new Ultrabook. If you count yourself among those who are interested in such a laptop, the new S7-392 models are available starting today at a variety of online vendors. We were able to find at least a couple places that are selling the upgraded model for less than the MSRP, and we think the added SSD capacity and performance is probably worth the extra $200. Get that price closer to $1500 and I’m sure more people would be willing to take a bite.

Source: Acer PR

POST A COMMENT

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • andykins - Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - link

    lol that's so funny. The reason why nobody other than Apple is using HD5000 is because they're such an "evil" company who's colluded with Intel to buy up all the supply of the chips? Or maybe the other OEMs are stingy penny-pinching bastards who can't be bothered to spend that little bit extra. This laptop is selling for $1400+ ... Reply
  • MrSpadge - Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - link

    In the few benchmarks I'Ve seen comparing them, HD5000 isn't allt hat much of an improvement over HD4600, despite twice the number of shaders. HD5000 seems pretty much power and memory bandwidth limited, that's why HD5200 is a significant improvement. Reply
  • teiglin - Monday, August 12, 2013 - link

    A few days ago, the MS store had the high-end model for under $1200 for students, though it was probably an error as it's now showing $1484. I almost pounced, but I have very little faith in Acer as a general rule. I'd love to see a proper review of this, as well as the Sony Vaio Pro and the new Samsung Series 9 or whatever they call it now (mmmmmm, 3200x1800). Reply
  • CadentOrange - Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - link

    I have no faith in Acer at all. This laptop does little to change things. Reply
  • solipsism - Monday, August 12, 2013 - link

    For the price and specs there seems to be plenty of better options out there. Reply
  • Dizway - Monday, August 12, 2013 - link

    It's been available for weeks. Already a few reviews on Amazon. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - link

    The news post from Acer says, "Acer announces US pricing and configurations for its S7-392 Ultrabook", so I guess anything prior to now was either early release or something. Maybe it's that the models are now available on Acer's store? Anyway, still figured it was worth a short post. Reply
  • Zeratul56 - Monday, August 12, 2013 - link

    Isn't the Intel 7260 ac capable?

    http://ark.intel.com/products/75439/Intel-Dual-Ban...
    Reply
  • cmikeh2 - Monday, August 12, 2013 - link

    The 7260 is ac capable in only some of the cards. Search for the product on Newegg and you'll see three different versions of the 7260, n, n + bluetooth, and ac + bluetooth. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - link

    Intel has Advanced-N and Wireless-N as well as Advanced-AC and Wireless-AC cards, sadly with many overlapping numbers. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now