Every year Samsung launches a new Galaxy S flagship smartphone, and as always, Samsung puts the best platform that can be bought in their devices. The Galaxy S5 is no exception, as the MSM8974AC, or Snapdragon 801, powers the Galaxy S5. The 8974AC is the 2.45 GHz bin of the MSM8974AB, a slightly massaged MSM8974 that first launched with the LG G2 and other devices in the summer of 2013. As a recap, the MSM8974AB increases the clock speed of the Hexagon DSP to 465 MHz from 320 MHz, and the LPDDR3 RAM clocks go from 800 MHz to 933 MHz. What really matters though, is that GPU goes from 450 MHz to 578 MHz from 8974 to 8974AC. I definitely have to point to Anand's piece on the Snapdragon 801 for anyone that wants to know more.

The other portion of the hardware story is the camera, which is probably one of the biggest areas for OEMs to distinguish themselves from the pack. Samsung seems to be playing it safe this year with a straight upgrade from 13MP to 16MP by increasing sensor size, and pixel size remains at 1.12 micron side edge length. It is notable that the camera sensor seems to be in a 16:9 aspect ratio, which would make it possible for both photos and videos to keep the same interface without odd reframing effects when going from photo preview to camcorder functionality. Optics are effectively unchanged from the Galaxy S5, as the focal length in 35mm equivalent remains at 31mm, the aperture remains at F/2.2. The one area where there could be a notable improvement is the promised ISOCELL technology, which physically separates pixels better to reduce quantum effects that can lead to lower image resolution and also increases dynamic range, although this will require testing to verify the claims made by Samsung. Samsung has also added 4K video recording for this phone and real time HDR to extend the dynamic range of the camera.

The Galaxy S5 has 2GB of RAM, also not too surprising given the 32-bit ARMv7 architecture of the 8974AC.

The display is a 1080p 5.1” panel, which makes this phone around the same size as the LG G2. Samsung has definitely improved AMOLED, but first impressions are unlikely to tell much when it comes to the quality of calibration and other characteristics of the device. In all likelihood, this will continue to use an RGBG pixel layout in order to improve aging characteristics as the various subpixels age at differing rates. I would expect max brightness to increase, although this may only show in very specific conditions such as extended sunlight exposure and low APL scenarios.

The industrial design seems to be an evolution of the Note 3, with a texture that looks similar to that of the Nexus 7 2012. However, whether the stippled texture will actually avoid the long-term issue of a slimy/oily feel is another question that will have to be answered after the hands-on. While we're still on the point of the hardware design, the Galaxy S5 is IP67 rated, which is why the microUSB 3.0 port has a cover for water and dust resistance.

The fingerprint sensor is a swipe-based one, and Brian has voiced displeasure over swipe sensors like those found in the One max. I personally think that there could be some issues with ergonomics, as Samsung places the home button very close to the edge of the phone, which would make it rather difficult to swipe correctly over the home button, especially if the device is being used with one hand.

As always, Samsung has included removable battery and a microSD slot for those that need such capabilities, although now that Samsung is following Google guidelines regarding read/write permissions, the utility of the microSD slot could be much less than previously expected. For the battery, things are noticeably different as Samsung has gone with a 3.85V chemistry compared to the 3.8V chemistry previously used by the Galaxy S4. With a battery capacity of 10.78 WHr, this means that it has 2800 mAh. For reference, the Galaxy S4 had a 9.88 WHr battery with 2600 mAh. 

As always, Samsung has put TouchWiz on top of their build of Android that will ship with the Galaxy S5, and it mostly looks the same. There are definitely some new features though like My Magazine, which seems to be a way of presenting multiple sources of information using a scrollable list of tiles with images on them.

There might be a trend here in the paragraphs, and while some may see it as a tic, it’s probably more representative of the consistency that Samsung is bringing to the table. “As always” means that people know what to expect, and while it may not be nearly as exciting to the tech press, average people live and die by what’s relatively familiar, not what’s new and exciting. The addition of new features and consistent improvements to performance without compromise relative to the previous generation is definitely something to be applauded, and with review units, hopefully it will be possible to see how the GS5 stacks up against the competition.

At any rate, the phone will launch with blue, black, white, and gold colors. It launches April 11 in 150 countries.

POST A COMMENT

127 Comments

View All Comments

  • Notmyusualid - Tuesday, February 25, 2014 - link

    ^^ Reply
  • Mondozai - Tuesday, February 25, 2014 - link

    Jeff doesn't make much sense. Reply
  • CBone - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    For all the complaining about it being underwhelming, gradual changes with obvious continuity of design is what wins in the phone game. Samsung isn't out to sell a handful of phones to a couple tech bloggers, they're trying to sell a couple hundred million of these things. Weird ass "everything you thought you knew about a Samsung phone is now wrong" changes for the sake of change is not what people or carriers will actually buy. Haters and professional curmudgeons complained enough about them adding software and features that you didn't ever need to use or acknowledge the existence of unless you wanted to at no extra cost. Slow and steady familiarity is the name of the game. This and it's niche seeking derivatives will sell well enough to keep Samsung and Apple the only manufacturers making any money on phones. Reply
  • tbutler - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    Incremental changes work great when you're starting from a good base. Not so good when the base is bad.

    Likewise, incrementalism works when the changes are good and well-thought-out. Not so much when they aren't.

    When you have a kitchen sink phone, incremental changes don't cut it. Especially incremental changes that are more of the same 'throw it at the wall and see what sticks.' What it needs most is taking all the stuff that's been tossed in there over the last couple of generations, throwing out the stuff that didn't stick, and tweaking the stuff that did so that it all works together.

    If you're going to throw in a fingerprint sensor, don't just repeat the stuff from the Atrix/One Max that didn't work; make it work right and ergonomically.

    tl;dr - Incrementalism works when it's refinement. Samsung's more like a katamari.
    Reply
  • CBone - Wednesday, February 26, 2014 - link

    Samsung has an overall strategy of trying a lot of things. They aren't replacing what is already out there, just adding to it. Why would anyone object to that? It's working for them and you don't have to buy it. How is it a "kitchen sink phone"? There is a clear continuity from the S2 to the S5. The fact that there are other phones (Note, mini, active, etc.) in the family doesn't change that.

    You say the base is bad, but their sales say otherwise. They must be doing something right.

    There's a difference between using the available features to see what you can do and using the features to look for griping points. Why would you gripe about your local buffet adding more things if they didn't get rid of the things you liked before?
    Reply
  • darwinosx - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    Sadly for your fanboy like theory the S 4 sold far below estimates and manufacturing had to ramped down as a result. Reply
  • CBone - Wednesday, February 26, 2014 - link

    "Far below estimates" still happens to be hella more than anyone but Apple. You do know that every company in the yearly phone game ramps down manufacturing at some point after launch, right? That doesn't have anything to do with anything. Reply
  • batongxue - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    That is an ugly phone! Reply
  • batongxue - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    HTC's best chance to come back Reply
  • ol1bit - Monday, February 24, 2014 - link

    Agreed. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now