Half Life 2 Performance
For our Half Life 2 tests, we used our own at_canals_08-rev7 timedemo, with the same settings that we've
used in the past for our Half Life 2 performance coverage.
Half Life 2 is particularly interesting because it is the only game we tested that actually shows a reasonable performance increase for the X800 XL 512MB. The only resolution where the X800 XL 512MB offers any real performance benefit is at 1600x1200 with 4X AA enabled, but what's truly impressive is that the X800 XL 512MB is able to run at this resolution at quite a playable frame rate. Unfortunately, this was the only game that we could find where there's any sort of real world performance improvement to be found with the X800 XL 512MB. The rest showed nothing or slight improvements at already unplayable frame rates. And any performance improvement that we could find in Half Life 2 was easily dwarfed by just using a Radeon X850 XT instead; it's a faster overall card at a very similar price.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
70 Comments
View All Comments
Rawz - Thursday, May 19, 2005 - link
One game that could benefit from a 512 MB VRAM board is Everquest II. Currently, it is stated that no system setup avail. today can run the game, playble, with all its settings at maximum.I know mine can't(P4 2.8HT, 1GB PC3200 2.5 Corsair, Abit AI7 and MSI Radeon 9800Pro 128 - R360). No OC there.
Could you set a test with that game? (There is a free trial for it, as it is a MMORPG )
melgross - Sunday, May 8, 2005 - link
Son of a N00b, none of these game cards work well as workstation cards.The $500 workstation cards from both ATI and Nvidia are two to three times fast with most operations than the equiv. price game cards.
But they are much slower playing games.
Murst - Sunday, May 8, 2005 - link
Reading these posts was kinda funny.First of all, ATI wouldn't market a card just to test it. If ATI wants to test something, they can either evaluate it on a theoretical basis, or just develop several cards for their own use.
There is a possibility that longhorn could take advantage of 512 MBs of vram. Especially with dual core processors coming out, multi tasking *may* compeletely change. Get 2 monitors, play two games on the same computer at the same time. Of course, GPUs will still need to advance more before playing 2 graphically intense games is possible on the same computer with a single graphics card (dual gpu maybe? =p ). Well, with that said, although longhorn may need 512 MBs, this card will certainly not be able to handle it.
However, I bet this card will sell great. When some kid's mom will go to a store to buy the brat a brand new graphics card, she doesn't know what to pick. 9800, 6800, 5900, 6600, X800... that means absolutly nothing to MOST buyers. However, they see on the box that one card has 256MBs and another card has 512MBs. I'm sure most people will assume that more memory is better performance (hell, generally that is the case). So they'll buy this card, because that is the ONLY thing on a graphics card box that the general public can understand. Its a great tactic by ATI, and it will make them money. Its all about the labels on the box. 99.99% of the population has never seen or heard of benchmarks.
Son of a N00b - Saturday, May 7, 2005 - link
which there is, so there will be plenty of ppl that buy this card.xsilver - Friday, May 6, 2005 - link
if there are people that buy the 9550 256mb and fx5500 256mb over a 9800pro/6600gt 128mb there will be people that buy this cardMyrandex - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
This makes sense from a manufacturing and business aspect. X800XLs are cheaper and easier to produce than X850XT's, and of course someone will buy the card. I don't know why y'all don't get on nvidia's case more for the FX5200 having 256MB in some cases (and derivatives of it, like the 5500). That is wayyyy more rediculous than 512MB on an X800XL. Heck about the only thing 3D that the 5200 card is made for running an OpenGL screensaver :PPeanya - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
I do see a reason for this card, although I'd have to test it. I believe it's designed for specific games such as some popular on-line games like SWG and EQ. For the average gamer, this won't benefit at all. Oh well, I'm still happy with my 6800GT and my AMD64. I've never been a fan of ATI's drivers.PrinceXizor - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
Also, oodles of VRAM is useful for multi-monitor use. Some testing scenarios that involve that would be much appreciated too.Workstation performance (Alibre Design is a MCAD package that is DirectX based not OpenGL optimized), multi-monitor support, multi-tasking video operations, Longhorn.
Mostly though, I would like to see some multi-monitor and gaming benchmarks as these are the most likely to see performance gains. Just my $.02
P-X
Son of a N00b - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
any benchmarks of these cards from a workstation standpoint? If ati was that dull enough to release a 512 X800 why not accidently release a card that can preform okay in workstation progs, without the hefty price of a worksation card? Hmm (especially with the nvidia cards, isnt the 6800ultra 512 the same as a quadro on the hardware end?) a soft mod BIOS flash could prove to be interesting?what do you think Anand?
civilgeek - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
This review tested games that are explicitly made for this round of 256 meg cards. Try games that our made for future cards... like several of the MMOs. For example EQII would be a prime example as I have not heard of a single machine being able to run the game on extreme settings with reasonable frame rates, even with 2 6800 gt cards in SLI. You need textures that are beyond todays round of games.