Gaming Performance

So with the basics of the architecture and core configuration behind us, let’s dive into some numbers.

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality (DX11)

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality (DX11)

Dirt Rally - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Dirt Rally - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Ashes of the Singularity - 2560x1440 - Extreme Quality (DX12)

Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 - Extreme Quality (DX12)

Battlefield 4 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Overall, AMD is pitching the RX 480 as a card suitable for 1440p gaming as well as 1080p gaming and VR gaming. In the case of 1080p the card is clearly powerful enough, as even Crysis 3 at its highest quality setting is flirting with 60fps. However when it comes to 1440p, the RX 480 feels like it’s coming up a bit short; other than DiRT Rally, performance is a bit low for the 60fps PC gamer. Traditionally cards in the $199-$249 mainstream range have been 1080p gaming cards, and in the long run I think this is where RX 480 will settle at as well.

The Polaris Architecture: In Brief Gaming Performance, Continued
Comments Locked

449 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntDX316 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    NVidia was talking about releasing the 1080 GTX for laptop instead of 1080M because they were scared AMD was going to come out big.

    The hope for massive gains are a lower expected price point is gone and the money milking will continue.
  • sonicmerlin - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    AMD has again ceded the entire laptop market to Nvidia thanks to these horribly inefficient cards.
  • medi03 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Comparing it to different tier card of current gen is childish or plain stupid, if coming from grown up.

    Performance is right on track.
    Power consumption is disappointing, although not a problem for this tier.

    I'm curios what it is caused by, could well be Samsung 14nm vs Glofo 16nm. I recall Apple's chips from Samsung were consuming more power than from TSMC, despite that one would expect it to be other way round.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    In what world do you live ? Here in Canada, the Nvidia GTX 1080 sells for over 900 dollars Canadian !! The GTX 1070 is over 600 dollars. An RX480 with 8 Gigs of RAM it's about 300 dollars.
    I'll get one for Christmas and that leaves me plenty of change to buy an Oculus Rift set. How is that such a F-up ?
    The stupidity on your behalf is astounding.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    RX480 + Oculus Rift Set = GTX1080. Pricewise. That's a good F-up for me. Christmas is looking good.
  • steamerSama - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Many people have this twisted expectation. That a 200$ card will outperform something twice its cost is ridiculous. AMD has made a blunder, yes, by not releasing their flagship 490 first and come up with economy class 480. But other than that, if you were expecting a better performance than this, you were perhaps being sucked in by the hype
  • loguerto - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    Let's see how all of this nice stuff transforms into performance ...
  • rtho782 - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    I think at this point I'd be more shocked had you posted a full review ;)

    So we're now waiting on GTX 960, GTX 1080/70, and RX 480....
  • justaviking - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    We now have TWO QUESTIONS to ask every time a new GPU comes out:
    1) Can it play Crysis?
    2) Where is the full GTX 1080 review?
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    "2) Where is the full GTX 1080 review?"

    The full RX 480 review will be in a few days. The full GTX 1080 review will be a couple of days after that. RX 480 would have been a full review today, but I managed to slice myself with the RX 480 on Tuesday and needed to resolve that first...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now