Dawn of War III

A Dawn of War game finally returns to our benchmark suite, with its predecessor last appearing in 2010. With Dawn of War III, Relic offers a demanding RTS with a built-in benchmark; however, the benchmark is still bugged, something noticed by Ian, as well as by other publications. The built-in benchmark for Dawn of War III collects frametime data for the loading screen before and black screen after the benchmark scene, rendering the calculated averages and minimum/maximums useless. While we used the benchmark scene for consistency, we used OCAT to collect the performance data instead. Ultra settings were used without alterations.

A note on the 1080p results: further testing revealed that Dawn of War III at 1080p was rather CPU-bound on our testbed, resulting in anomalous performance. Due to the extreme time constraints, we discovered and determined this very late in the process. For the sake of transparency, the graphs will remain as they were at the time of the original posting.

Dawn of War III - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityDawn of War III - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityDawn of War III - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

 

Dawn of War III - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityDawn of War III - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityDawn of War III - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Ghost Recon Wildlands Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Comments Locked

213 Comments

View All Comments

  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Enough AMD fans will buy at inflated prices to make AMD some cold hard cash, then they will lower the price in 3 months.
  • Aldaris - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    It's still a competitor against the 1080.
  • mapesdhs - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Not when it costs 100 UKP more (UK pricing). If the US pricing is as claimed, then I guess it's down to how much one cares about power/noise.
  • xfrgtr - Tuesday, August 15, 2017 - link

    the 64 does very poorly against the 1080
  • darkfalz - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Not really. The x70 is usually 75% the performance of the x80. 25% is nothing to baulk at even if the price premium is much more than 25%.

    The 56 is something like 85-90% as fast as the 64 and significantly cheaper.

    It's a shame this GPU arch is essentially DOA. Makes the wait for Volta much longer. Then again my 1080 is still giving me great performance and I'm CPU limited a lot at 1440p.
  • mapesdhs - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    I think you're right, this will give NV more time to refine Volta, it'll sustain 10x0 sales for longer, so we'll have to wait for something better for those who want to move beyond the current 10x0 series.
  • Da W - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Ryzen, Vega, Infinity fabric. The stage is set for a new fusion. Can't wait to see what their top 4-core + iGPU can do as a streamer box.
  • tipoo - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    It's surprising there still isn't even an APU as powerful as the PS4s GPU yet.
  • Qwertilot - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    They have, alas, no R&D money for that sort of 'side' project.
  • msroadkill612 - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    I hear nothing but good from folks who actually use amdS apuS appropriately. The 7850k was a classic for the money.

    Importantly, they have remained in the apu biz all along, and have the unique skillset to competently execute a new gen apu.

    I wouldnt call mobile ryzen a side project. Its a cornerstone.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now