E-Trend: More QA

The previous factory wing we were in used line assembly for the motherboards and high volume laptops. Since those are high volume productions (1 million boards or more!), tooling a line over for the final motherboard makes sense. However, in this part of the factory, a cell approach is better suited.



About six workers each accomplish several tasks per station rather than 20 workers accomplishing 1 task. The result is a lower output, but easier turnarounds for smaller orders. Keep in mind, when ECS says small, that could be anywhere between 5,000 to 25,000 units.

In the background, you can see these systems running a burn-in test. While the previous systems we saw ran for 4 hours, this client required their new systems to burn in for 8 hours.



Here, you will see ECS employees dismantle some OEM laptops to remove the processor and hard drive. The OEM client will then put their own CPU and hard drive into the laptop.



Below we have a snapshot of a real lot of OEM systems. There are 36 systems per pallet and about 15 pallets; and this isn’t even the warehouse.



E-Trend: Factory #26 Final Thoughts
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shalmanese - Sunday, October 5, 2003 - link

    "In any case, the factory itself does seem extremely considering all of the manual labor around. "

    seem extremely what?
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    I am using an ECS board AMD XP 2400 CPU. Works well (no problem with Windows 98, XP, or Linux). Cheap too ~$67. I built another for mom and it works great too. ECS provides computer motherboards that are affordable and work great (very stable) and that's what most families of the world want/need.

    It's good to put people to work by buying ECS. Or else, they would starve because companies will move elsewhere (e.g., India) where labor is cheaper to cut costs (that's why motherboard factories moved from Taiwan to China in the first place).

    It may not be perfect wages compared to the U.S. but I'm sure the workers over there appreciate it and the nice clean factories. Living costs are lower too over there.

    In the U.S., workers complain too much and half ass too much that's why all companies are shipping the jobs overseas where people work harder, better, and complain less. Sucks for U.S. workers but tough luck for there laziness. Look at Ford and all american cars (sucks bigtime--100% breakdown within 1 year). I know none of you computer users would ever want americans to build motherboards or else all computers would breakdown in a few months and still cost a lot. And every year workers would play the stupid Strike game delaying products. No, no consumers wants lazy, clumsy, greedy game playing americans workers messing with our computer parts.

    I would do the same (hire hardworking overseas workers) if I ran a corporation. Why pay premium wages to lazy half ass workers who complain all the time and threaten lawsuits and call in sick every month so they can watch a ball game and file fake workers comp claims which is typical of american workers?

    BTW, I went to a post office where there were 4 asian clerk and 1 american clerk. The asian workers were polite and very very efficient and competant easily servicing 1 client a minute (max). The lazy, incompetant american worker took 10 minute per client and kept needing to ask questions from the supervisor. I think that anyone running a business if they saw this difference in work efficiency/competancy would only hire asians since they are most efficent and competant and result in best business profits (for shareholders) and lowest costs and best products for consumers.

    I know lazy americans might get angry but if you think rationally, you know I am right and that's what most businessmen think.
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    Nice! I've always wondered where that crappy motherboard in my Grandma's eMachine came from.
  • AgaBooga - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    Its good to see the QA put into their parts, I wonder if any other motherboard vendors will read this article and improve if they aren't as good as ECS in terms of testing. If their parts go through this much testing, then why do people sometimes have to RMA a board like this?
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    Forgot to tell about PC Chips history with fake cache on motherboards back in the 486-days...

    ECS is one of the companies that pay as little as they can to the workers.

    Some of their series really have a RMA-problems... but they are cheap. The manufacture a lot for others -- some are good, others are typical ECS-quality.

    Seems to me like a big "Thank you for the trip"-article....
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    After the fake cache scandal pc chips was involved with in the earily pentium motherboard days, i'd swore to never touch any of their products again. Be it ecs, amptron, alton, houston tech, etc etc etc.

  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    "I emailed Anand if we could get polo shirts with that motto on it, but I did not get a response."

    Anyone who appreciates irony has to be in hysterics over this line.
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    if ECS went public 10 yrs after creation, why is it 1994 and not 1997 in the first paragraph?
  • DAVIDS - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    Very informative article. It's amazing that many of the workers get only $150/month. I sure hope their room and board is included.
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, October 4, 2003 - link

    This is a great article that provides information that i cant find everywhere else.

    Good job Kristopher!

    I never would have imagined that the bulk of the ECS workforce were women.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now