AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here. As with the ATSB Heavy test, this test is run with the drive both freshly erased and empty, and after filling the drive with sequential writes.

ATSB - Light (Data Rate)

The Light test average data rates don't show any clear improvement from the new firmware used by the Team Group MP34. When the test is run on an empty drive, the overall performance is great for all of the Phison E12 drives we've tested, without much variation between firmware versions or drive capacities. The full drive test runs show a small advantage for the higher-capacity models. Samsung's drives have the highest scores in both cases, and the Silicon Motion SM2262EN provides similar empty-drive performance at the cost of horrible full-drive behavior.

ATSB - Light (Average Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)

The Team MP34 shows small improvements to both average and 99th percentile latencies compared to the older Phison firmware, but these differences are insignificant compared to those with other hardware: the Phison E12 was already offering great latency by the standards of 512GB drives, and the performance loss when the test is run on a full drive is much less than some of its competition shows.

ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)

Phison may have improved both average read and write latencies by a few microseconds with their newer firmware used on the MP34, but the changes are insignificant. What is important is that they didn't make anything worse in pursuit of improvements, in contrast to Silicon Motion's SM2262EN.

ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)

The 99th percentile write latencies for the Team MP34 are a bit better in the full-drive case than the Gigabyte Aorus 512GB, but generally speaking even for these lower capacity drives virtually all of the write operations in the Light test go straight to SLC cache with minimal latency. The 99th percentile read latency is also slightly improved, with almost all read operations completed in under 1ms even when the test is run on a full drive.

ATSB - Light (Power)

The Team MP34 and other Phison E12 drives use less energy over the course of the Light test than Samsung's drives and several other high-end NVMe drives, but ADATA's SX8200 Pro comes out ahead of the Phison drives when the test is run on an empty drive. For this test, even the entry-level NVMe drives require more energy than the Crucial MX500 SATA SSD.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random IO Performance
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • ssd-user - Sunday, May 19, 2019 - link

    I see that you are still in denial about how it was you who couldn't read diagrams. I'd also like to point out that I'm actually trying to be the change I want to see exactly by asking for the sorting to be fixed.

    Because the sorting clearly is wrong. I pointed out a very stark example of when a much worse drive sorts above the better ones.

    Also, your lack of reading comprehension is showing in how you think this is only about TRIM. As I said, this is about disk full situations. And even with TRIM, the disk may simply be close to full. Not everybody buys an SSD that is twice as big as it needs to be.

    I was also pointing out that even if your drive isn't full, it may well show the full behavior in reality.

    Sorry for not being your ideal party buddy.
  • peevee - Monday, May 20, 2019 - link

    Who uses their SSDs full to the brim and in sustained write mode? Honestly, that scenario is not even realistic for properly managed DB servers, let alone in client systems where the only wait time which actually happens is during system boot/application launch/data load on up to 80% full (in Anandtech-speak "empty" system).
    Client writes are all cached first and the write itself happens in background, the user does not have to wait anything.

    AT does not even test this scenario properly, even their "Light" test is WAY too write-heavy for that.

    A synthetic which would reflect that is something like "64kb random read" (runs are 16 clusters=64k on NTFS, and most DLLs are close to that size).
  • MDD1963 - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    660P from Intel is $109 for 1 TB....; even though it is 'only' 2x PCI-e lanes capable, it is still more than 'snappy' for that sort of cost/capacity ratio....
  • peevee - Monday, May 20, 2019 - link

    Why do they even use x4 PCIe when they cannot even saturate x2? Really, peak read of 1.4GB/s is pathetic.
  • DyneCorp - Monday, June 17, 2019 - link

    "The write endurance ratings are still competitive with high-end drives that offer five year warranties"

    The MP34 has over twice the endurance of any SSD utilizing the SM2262 with Micron NAND. I apologize, but I'm not understanding what you mean by "still competitive". Seems as if Phison is outclassing the competition in certain regards. A small sacrifice in performance for exceptionally more endurance.
  • DyneCorp - Monday, June 17, 2019 - link

    Metrics*, not regards ha.
  • crimson117 - Friday, April 24, 2020 - link

    Looks like the new MP34's offer a 5-year warranty:

    256GB - TM8FP4256G0C101
    512GB - TM8FP4512G0C101
    1TB - TM8FP4001T0C101

    https://www.teamgroupinc.com/en/product/mp34

    https://www.teamgroupinc.com/en/catalog/act.php?ac...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now