Epox 5epa+: Features and Layout


 Epox 5epa+ Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket 775 Pentium 4 (Prescott)
Chipset Intel 915P/ICH6R
BUS Speeds 100MHz to 400MHz (in 1MHz increments)
Realtime Turbo Mode 202, 206, 210, 214, 220, 226
DDR2 Speeds Auto, 333, 400
PCI Express Speeds 100MHz to 150MHz in 1MHz increments
Core Voltage -0.10V to +0.2125V in 0.0125V increments
DRAM Voltage +0.1V to +0.7V in 0.1V increments
Memory Slots Four 184-pin DDR Slots
Dual-Channel Unbuffered Memory to 4GB
Expansion Slots 1 PCIe x16 Slot
2 PCIe x1 slot
4 PCI Slots
Onboard SATA/RAID 4 SATA 150 drives by ICH6R
Can be combined in RAID 0, 1, Intel Matrix
Onboard IDE/RAID One Standard ATA100/66 (2 drives)
Plus 4 ATA133/100/66 drives by IT8212F
ITE drives can be combined as RAID 0, 1, 0+1
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports
No FireWire Ports
Onboard LAN Gigabit PCI Ethernet by Marvell 88E8001
Onboard Audio AC'97 2.3 Realtek ALC850
8-Channel with SPDIF
Tested BIOS M265

Just before we completed the 915 roundup, Epox shipped us their newest version of the 5epa+ motherboard. Epox is well known for fast motherboards that overclock well, so we had high expectations of the performance of overclocking capabilities of this latest Epox board. The packaging is flashy with a large black package and standout graphics.



The Epox that we tested was the 5epa+ version, which included the RAID version of the ICH6R south bridge. While it was a pleasure to see ICH6R available as an option on the Epox 915, it was a disappointment to see some of the other choices that were made to keep prices down. First, the Intel High Definition audio has been replaced by an AC'97 2.3 Realtek ALD850. The 850 is a capable 8-channel audio codec, but it is certainly not the equivalent of Intel Azalia HD audio. We wish that Epox had found a way to keep HD audio like others here have done with boards that will sell in a similar price range. Next, Gigabit LAN is a nice feature, but this Gigabit LAN rides the slower PCI bus instead of the PCIe bus that could have provided better performance. When attached to PCI, there really isn't much advantage to Gigabit LAN over 10/100 LAN. Some will argue that none of us really need Gigabit LAN right now when broadband is hardly constrained by 100 LAN. However, if you need or want the advantages of Gigabit LAN, you won't find them on a Gigabit LAN saddled with the slower PCI bus. Last, there are no Firewire ports on the Epox. If you need them, look elsewhere, but for most, the missing Firewire ports really won't matter very much.

It is a good thing that Epox also noticed that 2 IDE devices would be very limiting for some users of the 5epa+. To correct this potential handicap, Epox added an ITE 8212 controller that provides support for four additional IDE devices.

Epox does not disappoint in the controls and ranges available for tweaking the 5epa+ in BIOS. The +0.7V maximum memory voltage translates into 3.3V from the stock 2.6V for the DDR memory supported by the Epox 915. This should be a range that will satisfy most memory overclockers. CPU voltage is also a generous range from a slight underclock (for cooler operation) to a +0.2125V overclock. This translates into 1.60V maximum with a current Prescott Socket T CPU.



When we first looked at the Epox, we recognized the unusual layout from our review of the Biostar P4TGP 775. The boards are not identical, features are a little different, but the 20/24-pin power connector is badly placed in the center of the board on both. Be careful when connecting the bulky power cable because it has to be routed around and behind the processor. The 12V 4-pin connector is better placed along the top edge of the board. All the IDE and floppy connectors, those driven by the chipset as well as those supported by the ITE controller, are located near the lower right edge of the board, below the midline. This is not a favorite location, but it still works fine with most board designs. With the diagnostic LEDs, SATA ports, and BIOS also located in this same area, it becomes a very busy quadrant. You need to plan cable routing to make sure that everything is still visible and/or accessible after the board is installed.

The 4 DIMM slots are also quite tight to the PCIe video slot plane. However, they are set further back than on most board designs, so they will only interfere with changing memory when you are using a very large video card.

ECS PF4 915P Extreme: Overclocking and Stress Testing Epox 5epa+: Overclocking and Stress Testing
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • coldpower27 - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    Of course the Pentium 4 560 is gonna be outperformed, The Pentium 4 560 is designed to compete at the 417US price point while the Athlon FX 55 is designed for the 827US, were talking double the P4 560 in price. i believethe closest competitor for the Pentium 4 560 in price is probably the Athlon 64 3700+ even though it is on Single Channel DDR.
  • danidentity - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    Even the 3800+ could be included, but that is still about $180 more expensive than the 560, according to Newegg.
  • danidentity - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    I know comments like I'm about to make have been made before, and I am not biased, but I wanted to reiterate.

    Why is the FX-55 even part of the benchmarks in this review? Why not a 3500+? The FX-55 is TWICE the price of the Pentium 560 according to current Newegg prices.

    I know the argument will be that the FX-55 and the 560 are two of the highest performing chips from the two camps. But the fact of the matter is that most people shopping for a 560 aren't going to be shopping for a FX-55. It's in an entirely different class.
  • mongoosesRawesome - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    Can you do a comparison between soundstorm and dolby digital live? What is the bitrate of the encoding? Frequency range? Overall quality?

    It seems like this may be the second time I pass on AC3 encoding though. Last time I chose a northwood platform over AMD and NF2, and this time I'll likely choose the NF4 over intel and dolby digital live.

    Would be nice to be able to easily hook it up to my klipsch dolby digital decodor though...
  • anandtechrocks - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    Thanks for the great review!
  • MAME - Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - link

    AMD >>>>>>>>>>>>> *

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now