Memory Performance

Memory Bandwidth Comparison - Read Performance

Memory Bandwidth Comparison - Write Performance

Memory Bandwidth Comparison - Latency Performance

We recently switched to version 2.50 of Everest, so these scores are not comparable to previous tests with version 2.20. The memory latency test shows a slight advantage to the Asus A8N32-SLI, but the read and write performance of the Abit AT8 is impressive and accounts for its performance in our benchmark tests.


Overclocking Performance

The overclocking performance graphs have been added to the standard benchmark test suite and should allow for a better comparison on the overclocking capabilities of tested boards. For more details on the specific overclocking abilities of this board, please refer to the Overclocking and Memory Stress Test sections on page 4.

Overclocking - A64 4000+ - (San Diego)

Overclocking - A64 4000+ - (San Diego)

The Abit AT8 is an excellent overclocking platform when utilizing stock multipliers, but it has overclocking issues when changing the HTT multiplier in the 1.1 BIOS, which is required to ensure widespread memory compatibility. Abit is currently working on this issue and expects to have a solution shortly. We had no issue overclocking our AMD Athlon 64 4000+ to a 322 HTT setting at the 9x multiplier with the version 1.0 BIOS although it limited our choice of memory modules for consistent test results. Although the Asus A8R-MVP has reached a 325 HTT setting in our test results, we had to change the DRAM Command Rate setting to 2 after reaching the 262 HTT level. The Abit board was able to utilize a DRAM Command Rate setting of 1 up to the HTT setting of 285 in our Opteron 170 overclock testing.



General Performance & Encoding Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • Duplex - Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - link

    I really liked it you did a test with BH5 at 1T 2225 timings,
    BUT,
    I would be so much happier if you also could test at how high clocks you
    can run at 1T 2225-timings. That is at least how I define overclocking memory.
    You still have the board, so pleeeaaaaaaaaaaase give it a try!

    You overclocked with 1T 2.5-5-5-7 timings, but as I´m sure you know it´s not the same thing as overclocking the memory with 1T-2-2-2-5 timings, which BH5/UTT owners mainly gain performance from.

    This is something I miss with most of your reviews, and I think Many Many readers would appreciate if you both tryed overclocking with tight resp. lose timings in the future.
    It´s often tight timings that makes the boards stand out from the rest.
    CPU stability and overclocking seldom differs more than 10% while the RAM clocks at 1T-2-2-2-5 often is either 200MHz or something like 280MHz (40%). Many boards still can´t run 1T-2-2-2-5 at all.

    Memory Performance is about 1. tight timings and 2. high clocks
    Maybe my facts isn´t totally correct, but I hope you see what I´m aiming at :-)
  • Gary Key - Friday, March 24, 2006 - link

    quote:

    This is something I miss with most of your reviews, and I think Many Many readers....


    Hi,

    We are currently testing another RD480 board so I will provide the highest stable overclock at 2-2-2-5(7)-1T for the Abit and Asus RD480 boards along with the new one.

    Gary
  • Duplex - Friday, March 24, 2006 - link

    Great! Splendido! Magnifico! eeeeh, Excellent! Much appreciated!
  • Duplex - Wednesday, April 5, 2006 - link

    How are things going with the revised 1.1 bios, is the 256HTT limit gone?
    Has there been any time to look into it? ;-)

    I read the ECS-review. Nice to see the
    "The ECS KA1 MVP was very stable with 2 DDR modules in Dual-Channel mode at the settings of 2-2-2-5 at 2.7v. We were able to operate the memory at this configuration up to a 226HTT x12 setting." !!
    Whats happening with the tests you mentioned above with the Asus and Abit board?
    Estimated publishing date?
  • FireTech - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link

    Agreed, love the look of this MB for it's passive cooling and fan control options. I'll have to wait for the AT8 32X though as the AT8 is now discontinued here.
    Any news on the BIOS #1.1 results?
  • Gary Key - Monday, March 20, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Any news on the BIOS #1.1 results?


    So far so good. We are waiting on a particular GSkill module to arrive to complete testing.
  • SpHeRe31459 - Saturday, March 11, 2006 - link

    Dolby Digital Live is an option that a vendor must persue with Dolby and get their motherboard certified. Abit has not shown interest in this before, nothing I can find at the Abit site says this is Dolby Digital Live enabled. You guys sure about the AT8 having DDL?
  • Gary Key - Saturday, March 11, 2006 - link

    http://www.abit.com.tw/page/en/motherboard/motherb...">AT8 Specs


    The audio specifications are listed on the global site. The US site has the AL8 specs on the webpage and Abit has been notified of this. Abit is now including the ALC-882D with the DDL option on their higher end boards. We did not see it as being offered originally on the AT8-32x (complained about it) but have been told it will be included now. In fact, their Global website has been updated and shows it on the board. The board I tested had the ALC-882D codec and DDL (5.1, optical out to supporting receiver) was enabled in the drivers I used.

  • cornfedone - Friday, March 10, 2006 - link

    Looks like Abit, even though late to market, didn't bother testing their ATI chipset mobo before shipping it either. They must have figured if Asus could sell the completely junk A8R-MVP garbage, then there were plenty of fools who would rush out and buy the Abit version of garbage. You got to believe that judgment day isn't too far off for the Asian mobo companies if they keep shipping this kind of junk.

    It's pretty obvious Asus needs to switch product lines from PC hardware to rice cakes or chop suey so their skill set matches their products.
  • rjm55 - Saturday, March 11, 2006 - link

    Looks like the paid nVidia forum posters are at it again. They must really be afraid of ATI chipsets to go to these extremes. Wonder why?

    It's a shame this decent review got hijacked by a few crazies whose only goal was to disrupt and discredit.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now