Final Words and the Galaxy S 4 Comparison

The One is without a doubt the best Android smartphone I’ve ever used. HTC’s build quality and materials choices have been steadily improving over the past couple of years and I honestly don’t know a more fitting name for its latest flagship other than the One - it’s the one to get. Even iPhone users looking for something different might be tempted by the One.

For me it’s the camera performance and the highlights reel that really seal the deal. The fact that the One is an excellent looking device built out of top notch materials is just icing on the cake.

The rest of the spec list is equally fitting. I’m glad to see 802.11ac make the list. The great speakers and display are both useful and impressive.

Sense took a real step towards subtlety with 5.0, and it’s finally at a point where I don’t really mind the customizations. My preference is still for vanilla Android, but the latest iteration of Sense is far closer than it has ever been. The real trick is ensuring timely updates with major Android releases. If you’re an infrequent smartphone upgrader, the Nexus line is still the best option there.

Despite how well the One does in the build quality, looks and camera departments, HTC has an uphill battle ahead of itself. Samsung is clearly the dominating incumbent in the Android space, and it has the luxury of an order of magnitude higher quarterly revenues to support its smartphone business. If there ever was a David v Goliath race in the smartphone space, it would be between HTC and Samsung.

Zoe and the highlights reel are great features that need marketing to demonstrate and spread their word. The litany of new camera and interaction features that accompany the Galaxy S 4 will likely translate very well to cleverly crafted TV ads. I’d argue that HTC’s camera features (great low light performance, highlights reel) are more useful to me personally, but Samsung’s features (touchless scrolling, dual camera, smart pause) are easier sells to the mainstream smartphone market. Similarly, design and materials choices are obvious advantages for the One, but it’s easier to market a thinner and lighter phone.

Ultimately, HTC appears to have built a great phone for enthusiasts and one that can be marketed, with some effort, to the mainstream. Samsung, by comparison, seems to have its targets set squarely at the mainstream and it has the features and the marketing budget to really capture the attention of that audience. You can argue about the merits of features like the ability to automatically pause video based on whether or not you’re looking at it - personally I’d take better camera performance - but that’s a much easier feature to explain in a TV commercial than why larger pixels matter.

The One is expected to be widely available beginning next month.

The Rest of the Features
Comments Locked

434 Comments

View All Comments

  • darwinosx - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    Vaporware
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    vaporware is apple stock fella
  • Egg - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    You are right. It will probably not be better than any high-MP sensor with the same size if they both scale down to the same resolution.

    That's why the HTC One has a larger sensor. 1/3" instead of 1/3.2"...
  • Johnmcl7 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    "Sealed battery, non-expandable battery, 4MP camera will be deal breakers for many.
    The 'Ultrapixel' is just marketing gimmick for low resolution sensor. Yes, it will be better than SMALL low-MP sensors but I doubt they are any better than high-MP sensor with same size. 36MP D800 is almost as good as any low-MP DSLRs with the same sensor size."

    The D800 is a good demonstration that more pixels aren't an issue, it's not just almost as good as low-MP DSLRs it currently has the top rating on DXOMark and the next cameras down (D600, RX1) are using the 24MP FX sensor which has the second highest resolution for current selling full frame cameras.

    John
  • Pylon757 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    Except the D800 pixels, at 5.5um each, is not going to be constrained by optics and still has a lot of a headroom. A 1.1um pixel, at only 1.5 wavelengths of light, is really pushing it.
  • darwinosx - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    No it won't Most consumers don't care.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    the 4mp camera is a deal breaker
  • phillyry - Sunday, March 24, 2013 - link

    Why's that?

    Is it the optics or just the optics of the situation?
  • CeriseCogburn - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Spread your fingers out on the screen.
  • DEECEE - Friday, March 29, 2013 - link

    No, it's physics, for a given sensor size, the larger sensor pitch (distance between sites) will always give better low light noise performance all other factors being equal. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to have "all other factors" being equal, and higher performance CMOS chips in high end dSLR's always demands the price premium for that pixel density with "almost" equivalent noise performance. But you can't deny the advantage of a larger pixel pitch to low light noise performance.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now