Final Words

When you look at the Honor 5X on paper it's impossible to deny that it offers some pretty great specs for its $199 price tag. Of course, specs alone don't make the phone, as they don't always translate into a good real world experience. In the case of the Honor 5X, however, I actually believe that they do. But before making any conclusions it's important to take a look at everything as a whole to see where it excels and where it needs some work.

Design wise, I think the Honor 5X is a solid $199 phone. The best I've seen here previously is plastic done well, and never a metal chassis. That being said, you obviously don't get the same fit, finish, and feel as an aluminum unibody device like the HTC One A9 or the iPhone. At $199 it would be unreasonable to expect that, and what the Honor 5X does provide is more than I would expect from a $199 phone. The metal chassis feels good in the hand, with an interesting mix of a brushed finish on the back and a sandblasted finish on the sides. I'm really not a big fan of the dot pattern on the RF inserts, and they don't align as well as I would like with the rest of the back, but these are fairly minor aesthetic complaints and they don't take away from how the phone feels when you use it.

The Honor 5X performs well for a $200 phone, and at this point there aren't really any big surprises that come with Snapdragon 616. CPU performance honestly isn't any better than the Snapdragon 410 or 615 devices, but the GPU performance is certainly much faster than 410. This is definitely an advantage over devices like the Moto G, which sell for similar prices. The 2GB of RAM also helps to ensure that apps can remain in memory and you don't run into problems like the launcher reloading or apps frequently crashing.

The 1920x1080 IPS display on the Honor 5X is quite good for a $200 device. Something worth mentioning is that it comes with a plastic screen protector pre-applied, which I promptly removed as I'm generally not a fan of any screen protectors. The quality of the LCD is better than I expected, with a much higher brightness than I've seen on any other mid range device, and the sharpness that you'd expect from a 401ppi panel. My only two issues are the fact that it's not calibrated, and the issues with color banding that are made more obvious by EmotionUI's translucency. Going forward, I'm definitely going to need to keep a closer eye on which devices utilize panels with native 8-bit per channel color depth, especially once HDR displays get thrown into the mix. Neither of these are deal breakers, but they're just something to make note of.

The Honor 5X did well in our battery life tests. Roughly ten hours in our web browsing test and over seven hours in PCMark are not scores to scoff at. It also lasts fairly long in BaseMark OS II and GFXBench 3.0, but it also doesn't perform near as well as other devices and I don't think there's much point in running a game at 15fps for four hours.

The camera is not exactly a weak point on the Honor 5X, but one could say that it's a weaker offering than what one would expect from a device with Sony's IMX214 sensor. In my daylight photo scene it's clear that the Honor 5X doesn't produce an output with the same level of sharpness as the Nexus 6 and Moto G. The color balance also seems a bit off, with the scene being shifted further toward blue than it should be. In addition, Huawei has similar problems to ASUS with heavy noise appearing in areas where it really shouldn't be, such as the sky of a photo taken during broad daylight. Since the Honor 5X has a better ISP than the Moto G this really comes down to Huawei's image processing, and it's something they can look to improve with future updates and devices. As for night time photography, it's really a toss up between the Honor 5X and Moto G. The 5X doesn't have the Moto G's chroma noise, but it's also has visibly less detail due to the heavy noise reduction smearing it away.

Finally, there's the Honor 5X's software. From a functional and visual perspective I actually don't mind this version of EmotionUI at all. If you're more of a purist you can always do away with Huawei's launcher, although you are still stuck with their applications and system wide elements like the notification shade. From a performance perspective I think Huawei needs to do a bit more work here. There are areas where the UI becomes really janky, and it's often when there's heavy translucency being used. There's really no point in using a UI that can't run properly with your CPU and GPU, and given the choice, I would take a smoother simpler UI over a complicated sluggish one every time.

While the Honor 5X certainly isn't sluggish in general, the few areas where it is are ones that you end up visiting a bit too often to simply ignore the issues, and I hope Huawei can take a look at the places where performance isn't where it should be and work on optimizing code and altering visuals to bring up the frame rate. I'm told that both EmotionUI 4.0 and Android Marshmallow are expected to show up for the Honor 5X within the next couple months, and those represent good opportunities to improve performance.

In the end the Honor 5X offers you a lot for your money, and so it fulfills its expected role quite well. You get a nice display, good internal hardware relative to the price, a metal chassis, a good fingerprint scanner, and a good camera. For $199 it would be difficult to find a better phone that you can buy as easily and widely as the Honor 5X, with the exception of users who value performance above everything else and would opt for the Zenfone 2. For everyone else looking for a mid-range smartphone, the Honor 5X should be high up on your list.

Software and UI Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • londedoganet - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    No LTE Web Browsing battery test? Are the bands incompatible?
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I was having difficulties getting sufficient reception due to the weather conditions. The phone has to be placed in a place where it's vulnerable to snow and rain. I'll try to run it at a later point if it's possible.
  • tipoo - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Looks like a fair jump over the Moto G for around the same price, nice to see this space heating up. I think the midrange is honestly where the excitement is now, the high end has gotten boring.

    Though, neither this nor the G are close to taking down the Zenfone 2 for GPU performance yet in the same price category, impressively. I'm unsure if the early issues with the 2 were worked out (battery life, screen color shifting to save power), but for gaming that has both trumped. I'd like to see the Zenfone 3.
  • blanarahul - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    If wonder what the real life performance /power differences are between S610 and S615 considering that the extra four cores barely make any difference. Also S610 should be a little cheaper as well.
  • usama_ah - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I purchased one from Amazon the day it was released for my mom. Prior to that she was using my OG Moto X on AT&T in Chicago.

    She's extremely pleased with the phone. There was a slight learning curve going from a near stock launcher to this OS but she loves the big, bright screen and the fingerprint unlock. Camera is good enough for her too. She has noticed the slight UI jankyness while moving about but that's not something she cares about. She uses WhatsApp with family and gets a LOT of pictures and videos so now she doesn't have to delete to make room because she can move them to a microSD card (I set it up to be one button transfer to microSD since WhatsApp doesn't let you default media there). She loves the battery life, and usually charges every other day. She loves the build quality and color (we got her the gold). Works well on AT&T LTE in Chicago and soon she'll be running dual SIM when she goes overseas.

    Overall I'm very happy with the purchase, and more importantly she is. It was hard for me to not get her the Moto G but I think we made the right choice, for her. If I was to recommend one to a friend I might still recommend the Moto G first because of customization and flexibility, closer to stock interface. Maybe this year's G will also have a fingerprint reader, we'll see.
  • zeeBomb - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Phone doesn't surprise me due to all the phones I looked at MWC, LOL.
    Brandon, if you get the chance, review the Alcatel Idol 4!
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    So it barely beats year old Motorola and Asus phones that sell for the same price. We are impressed because it has a little aluminum? I'd rather a plastic phone with Marshmallow, a better LTE radio, faster ram, and more NAND. This seems like year old specs at the launch, which shouldn't impress anyone.
  • formerglory - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Fun fact: the Honor 5X's screen *doesn't* have an oleophobic covering, thus the screen protector that comes with it (that has a coating). Ideally, you're not supposed to remove it, or else suffer the wrath of a constantly fingerprint-covered screen.
  • revanchrist - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    This is a low end phone priced at mid range price. Man, look at the Snapdragon 616, it's manufactured on 28nm LP. How old was that process already? I'll consider the 28nm HPM Snapdragon 650 and 652 and even the 14nm LPP Snapdragon 625 as mid range, but not the Snapdragon 615 and 616 thanks.
  • beginner99 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    My though as well. I don't see the midrange except in price. A53's are too slow for midrange and if you really use those, take ones made on 14/16 nm and hence better battery life. The charts clearly show you are better off with a 2 year old flagship.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now