Gigabyte 7VT600 1394: Basic Features

 Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket-462
Chipset VIA KT600 North Bridge
VIA VT8237 South Bridge
Bus Speeds up to 254MHz (in 1MHz increments)
Core Voltages Supported up to 1.850V (in 0.0250V increments)
I/O Voltages Supported N/A
DRAM Voltages Supported up to 2.80V (in 0.1V increments)
Memory Slots 3 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Expansion Slots 1 AGP 8X Slot
5 PCI Slots
Onboard IDE RAID N/A
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 Eight USB 2.0 ports supported by VT8237
VIA VT6306 IEEE-1394 FireWire (up to 3 ports available)
Onboard LAN Realtek RTL8101L
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC655 AC’97 codec
Onboard Serial ATA Two SATA connectors via VT8237 (RAID 0, 1 & 0 + 1)
BIOS Revision MG0 BIOS (6/20/2003)

Unfortunately, Gigabyte makes the same mistake with their KT600-based 7VT600 1394 motherboard that Epox had made with their KT600-based 8KRA2+. Gigabyte utilizes the Realtek ALC655 codec for onboard sound, instead of what VIA would have preferred – the VT1616 codec. The VT1616’s advantage stems from the fact that it can offer high fidelity sound while using the analog out port. The same cannot be said about nForce2 motherboards, which use the ALC650/655 codec. In other words, you won’t hear sound as good as what the VT1616 codec provides from an MCP-T powered nForce2 motherboard unless you make use of a SPDIF-out port and have speakers with a receiver. Like Epox, Gigabyte could have one upped other nForce2 motherboards in the sound department if they had simply opted for the VT1616 codec instead of the ALC655 codec. At least Gigabyte used the ALC655 codec instead of the ALC650, as the ALC650 does not dynamically switch the Mic in, Line in, and Line out ports.

The 7VT600 1394 utilizes a very basic 10/100 controller from Realtek, dubbed the RTL8101L. There’s nothing special to report about this particular 10/100 solution. In general, it should fit broadband users’ need quite well. Serious Gigabit Ethernet users will need to purchase an add-in (PCI) 10/100/1000 network card, if they plan on purchasing the 7VT600 1394.

Like so many of Gigabyte’s motherboards, the 7VT600 1394 includes support for dual BIOS technology. A backup BIOS is nice to have if you corrupt your first BIOS chip (e.g. you lose power to your system as you're updating your primary BIOS). You can switch over to the second BIOS chip in this situation, and not have to go through the trouble of correcting the issue through other, time-consuming means, such as a board RMA or the swap-trick.

The 7VT600 1394’s I/O ports configuration is fairly standard for a value motherboard. Included in this setup are two PS/2 ports, two serial ports, one parallel port, four USB 2.0 ports, one LAN port, and Mic In, Line In, and Line Out ports, which drive the onboard sound. The 7VT600 1394 also supports IEEE 1394 FireWire, courtesy of a VT6306 PCI-bound controller, capable of supporting up to three ports via two onboard headers. Fortunately, Gigabyte does include the 3-port IEEE 1394 FireWire bracket so that users aren’t forced to purchase one. This is especially important considering that the 7VT600 1394 does not have any rear FireWire, which has been the excuse in the past for motherboard makers not to include FireWire brackets.

As with all KT600 motherboards that we’ve come into contact with over the last couple weeks, the 7VT600 1394 has native Serial ATA support, courtesy of VIA’s brand new VT8237 South Bridge. The VT8237 supports RAID 0, 1 and 0 + 1, which is a nice addition for users looking for the best combination of RAID support in a desktop motherboard. The advantage of RAID 0 + 1 is fast data access (like RAID 0), but with the ability to lose one drive, yet still have a duplicate surviving drive or set of drives (like RAID 1). In case you didn’t already know, RAID 0 + 1 is stripping (RAID 0) and mirroring (RAID 1) combined without parity having to be calculated and written. In addition to all of this, VIA has also upped V-link's throughput from 533MB/s to 1066MB/s. All in all, VIA’s new South Bridge is impressive, and certainly gives KT600 boards some added value compared to nForce2 motherboards. The new increased chipset I/O bandwidth is a very welcome addition, as it should help for those “intangible” computing experiences, such as multi-tasking.

Index Gigabyte 7VT600 1394: Board Layout
Comments Locked

9 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Saturday, August 2, 2003 - link

    I don't get why people blame VIA for the SBlive issue when pretty much every other companies sound cards work flawlessly. Face it, VIA or Nforce you're gonna have issues with your SBlive. Right now on my "NFORCE2" the stupid control panel keeps crashing out on me and sometimes retarded sound has this annoying occational reverb crap which updating drivers seems to not fix. Man, if they didn't have the best gaming sound card i'd drop creative products in a heartbeat.
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, July 29, 2003 - link

    This guy read my mind!, all VIA chipsets I ever had were plagged with errors, KT133, KT133A and KT266A, this one stills make noices with the SB live!, no mather the filter installed. Never again VIA!, nVidia did a better first try with the nforce1 than VIA with the 3tr KT chipset.
  • Locutus4657 - Tuesday, July 29, 2003 - link

    I'm not sure if I'll ever buy another VIA chipset again. Ever since I checked their developers white pages on my KT133 chipset and found out it has over 200 pages of Errata. My next system will be either an nForce 2 system of a Operton system.
  • Anonymous User - Monday, July 28, 2003 - link

    2 Things I wanted to say.
    Good rather unbiased review, except that I dont really a gree that the KT600 is a value board. if people were interesting in SERIOUS value they (if they knew what they were doing, sadly most people out for a cheap computer wont) would still go with a NForce2 motherboard because you get a Geforce 4mx built in! I mean computer shops will probably sell the KT600 with the cheapest video card you can get and the end consumer would of been WAY better off having a geforce4mx built in. I mean at least you can taste even the latest games with gfmx4...which is really important.


    Secondly I can't express how disgusted I am in the MB makers that reck the Nforce2s reputation for good sound via the MCP-T sound storm technology by putting these crap realtek chips infront of them and ruining the sound quality of the nforce2 MBs, as far as I am concerned this should almost be illegal!
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    Ok review, but would have been better with a few backplate shots and memory bandwidth benchmarks.
  • ViRGE - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    It's worth noting that audio port switching isn't all it's cracked up to be. Nvidia for example, discourages the practice, which is why you won't find a SoundStorm board that uses it, even if most are using the 655 codec. This is all of course because it results in poorer sound quality(or so Nvidia claims), so in a sense, you're worse off with the 655 than you are with the 650, although with anything Realtek, you're doing worse than the reference(SigmaTel/VIA) solution.
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    Poor VIA, cmon Dawgs
  • Dennis Travis - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    Very good review Evan as usuall. Thanks!!
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    Ya know, if via would fix their stupid drivers packaging problems, they would do much better, at least as far as i'm concerned. I don't care if one size fits all, I just want to run the package for the product and have it remove the old and install the new and get it right. I'll never waste my time fooling around with their stuff until I've heard that's been fixed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now