The NVIDIA Titan V Deep Learning Deep Dive: It's All About The Tensor Cores
by Nate Oh on July 3, 2018 10:15 AM ESTDeepBench Inference: GEMM
Shifting gears to inferencing, what DeepBench is simulating with graphics cards are more for their suitability in inference deployment servers, rather than edge devices. So of the inference kernels, none of the 'device' type ones are run.
Precision-wise, DeepBench inference tasks support INT8 on Volta and Pascal. More specifically, Baidu qualifies DeepBench GEMM and convolutions as INT8 mutiply with 32-bit accumulate.
Both Titan V and Titan Xp feature quad rate INT8 performance, and DeepBench's INT8 inferencing implementation neatly falls under the DP4A vector dot product capability introduced by Pascal. The instruction is still supported under Volta, and shows up once again as IDP and IDP4A in the instruction set.
For IGEMM, as CUTLASS shows, DP4A is the bespoke operation. So we see 8-bit integer performance at a high level throughout, except in language modelling. Once again, the irregular dimensions don't lend itself to easy acceleration, if at all.
In fully-connected (or 'affine') layers, every node in that layer is connected to every node in the previous layer. What this means for a typical CNN is that the fully-connected layer is able combines all the extracted features to make a final prediction and classify the image. By the numbers, this also means large and regularly-proportioned matrices, which can equal large speedups as we see here.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
65 Comments
View All Comments
SirCanealot - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
No overclocking benchmarks. WAT. ¬_¬ (/s)Thanks for the awesome, interesting write up as usual!
Chaitanya - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
This is more of an enterprise product for consumers so even if overclocking it enabled its something that targeted demographic is not going to use.Samus - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
woooooooshMrSpadge - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
He even put the "end sarcasm" tag (/s) to point out this was a joke.Ticotoo - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
Where oh where are the MacOS drivers? It took 6 months to get the pascal Titan drivers.Hopefully soon
cwolf78 - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
Nobody cares? I wouldn't be surprised if support gets dropped at some point. MacOS isn't exactly going anywhere.eek2121 - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
Quite a few developers and professionals use Macs. Also college students. By manufacturer market share Apple probably has the biggest share, if not then definitely in the top 5.mode_13h - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
I doubt it. Linux rules the cloud, and that's where all the real horsepower is at. Lately, anyone serious about deep learning is using Nvidia on Linux. It's only 2nd-teir players, like AMD and Intel, who really stand anything to gain by supporting niche platforms like Macs and maybe even Windows/Azure.Once upon a time, Apple actually made a rackmount OS X server. I think that line has long since died off.
Freakie - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link
Lol, those developers and professionals use their Macs to remote in to their compute servers, not to do any of the number crunching with.The idea of using a personal computer for anything except writing and debugging code is next to unheard of in an environment that requires the kind of power that these GPUs are meant to output. The machine they use for the actual computations are 99.5% of the time, a dedicated server used for nothing but to complete heavy compute tasks, usually with no graphical interface, just straight command-line.
philehidiot - Wednesday, July 4, 2018 - link
If it's just a command line why bother with a GPU like this? Surely integrated graphics would do?(Even though this is a joke, I'm not sure I can bear the humiliation of pressing "submit")