DFI LANParty UT nF3-250Gb: Overclocker's Dream
by Wesley Fink on September 8, 2004 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
FSB Overclocking: DFI LANParty UT nF3 250Gb
DFI has given users just about everything that they could ask for in the way of overclocking options. So, what can you do with all those wonderful options for overclocking? We have already seen great results from the MSI K8N Neo and other Socket 754 boards, so we hoped that we could do even more with the DFI LANParty UT. We weren't disappointed.| Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed | |
| Default Voltage | |
| Processor: | Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0GHz |
| CPU Voltage: | 1.5V (default) |
| Cooling: | Thermaltake Silent Boost K8 Heatsink/Fan |
| Power Supply: | OCZ Power Stream 520W |
| Hard Drive: | Maxtor MaXLine III 250GB SATA (16MB Cache) |
| Memory: | OCZ PC3200 EL Platinum Rev. 2 or Geil PC3200 Ultra X |
| Maximum OC: (Standard Ratio) |
248x10 2470MHz (+24%) |
| Maximum FSB: (Lower Ratio) |
308 x 8 {1:1 Memory, 1 DIMM) 270 x 9 at (1:1 Memory, 2 DIMMs) |
This late 3200+ tops out around 245 to 246CPU setting at stock multiplier on the best overclocking boards. It reached 248 on the DFI nF3 250Gb at stock 10X ratio and stock voltage, which should be considered the limit of this CPU.
The performance at lower ratios, on the other hand, took our memory to performance levels never reached on any board - AMD or Intel. Both the Geil and OCZ memories are based on very recent Samsung TCCD memory chips, which performed well in our recent memory tests on an Intel test bed. They topped out at DDR557 to 561 on the Intel, so I was skeptical when DFI told me that TCCD memory could reach DDR600 on the nF3-250Gb. With a little tweaking, we were able to reach even further with this same memory, to DDR616 at 3-3-4-10 memory timings at 2.8V memory voltage.
It is significant that these record 1:1 overclocks were achieved with a SATA hard drive, since SATA drives are often an issue when overclocking Intel 775 boards. The SATA lock certainly appears to be working very well on this production DFI nVidia nF3 250Gb board.
DDR616 is the highest memory speed that we have ever reached on any board in our overclocking, with this memory or any other including DDR550. When you consider this is a 54% overclock of the memory's rated speed of DDR400, it puts into perspective the astounding performance of this memory on the DFI nF3 250Gb. To give you a better idea of what it took to reach DDR616, below is a BIOS shot of the memory timings to reach this milestone.
With a bit more tweaking, we managed to reach stable DDR600 performance with 2.5-3-4-10 memory timings with the OCZ and Geil at memory voltage of 2.8V. These are really aggressive timings for a memory running at DDR600.
We were able to achieve even faster 2.5-2-2-10 timings at DDR586 with OCZ3700EB, but it required the board limit of 3.1V to achieve stability at this speed. We have seen reports on the web of some achieving near DDR600 with OCZ3700EB on the beta DFI with 3.2V.
Please keep in mind that these incredible overclocks were achieved with 1 DIMM in this single channel board. We also tested 2 DIMMs of the same memory and found that we topped out at 270 CPU setting (DDR540) with the TCCD DIMMs. The "Auto" setting on Hyper Transport speed seemed to handle anything we threw at the DFI without complaint.
Front Side Bus Stress Test Results:
As part of our overclocking tests, a full range of stress tests and benchmarks were run to ensure that the DFI LANParty UT was stable at each overclocked FSB speed. This included Prime95 torture tests, and the addition of other tasks - data compression, various DX8 and DX9 games, and apps like Word and Excel - while Prime95 was running in the background. Finally, we ran our benchmark suite, which includes Veritest Winstone 2004 suite, Unreal Tournament 2003, SPECviewperf 7.1, and Aquamark 3. 248MHz was the highest overclock that we were able to achieve with the DFI while running these tests at default voltage - an outstanding performance with the Athlon 64.We were also able to complete stress testing at 300x8 with 2.5-3-4-10 memory timings. At that speed of 2.4Ghz at DDR600, we achieved the following results:
- Quake 3 - 474.0
- Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory-Radar - 104.3
- Sisoft Sandra 2004 - Standard Buffered - 4670/4673
- Sisoft Sandra 2004 - UnBuffered - 2583/2600
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
54 Comments
View All Comments
leexgx - Thursday, November 4, 2004 - link
the 939 AMD cpu will only be my upgrade path (unless i wait and some thing els comes out)my NF7-S v2.0 mobo has 2x faster mem speed then an s754 so in my view it be an Downgrade if i whent to it
my upgrade (dream at the mo :)
MSI K8N Neo2 (waiting for the nForce4 ultra to comes out) or something like it (but nf4 chip)
3500+ 939 (mite even wait for the 4000+ or the FX55 to come down in price)
2x 512 ddr 400 OCZ low latency stuff (or other stuff that mite run better then OCZ)
MiLaMber - Sunday, October 31, 2004 - link
HmmWhy on earth bring out this board for s754 NOW??
Do they honestly think ppl would have waited this long for s754? They SHOULD have made it s939.
I see this as lost revenue for DFI.
Fantastic board yes, but for those who are looking to currently upgrade, will there be many who opt for this baord over a s939?
I wish they had brought it out as a s939, as I would forget about buying an MSI K8N Neo2 in an instant.
Its all well and good having the best board, but you need to have some savvy to, and think about when the introduction of your board will result in the greatest revenue!
And thats just plain common sense.
tchuyev - Monday, October 25, 2004 - link
So... using 3 SATA disks in a RAID0 array (using SATA ports 2 & 3 + 1 or 2, along with 2 * 512 OCZ PC-4200), I can't overclock the motherboard any higher than 240 FSB, right ?Using both the nForce & Marvell SATA controlers with the same 3 SATA disks on a RAID0 array : is it more likely to cause a performance drop - comparing to 2 disks on ports 3 & 4 - more than anything else ?
In my case, wouldn't it be thus better to go for a Silicon Image 3114r instead, like on the Asus K8N-E Deluxe ?
Thanx a bunch ;)
GGiovanni - Saturday, October 9, 2004 - link
Is there any detail regarding the memory DDR616 bandwidth since this mb uses on single channel setup? I'm interested on bandwidth when oc , not only low CAS o other tweaks.Happy Buddha - Tuesday, September 21, 2004 - link
Opps! Looks like I have double personality and they bot want to know what RAM have you bought.=:p
Happy Buddha - Tuesday, September 21, 2004 - link
#47 - What RAM stick are you using?!? I have never seen a review on the Net that was able to pull these timing @245mhz Fsb..Happy Buddha - Tuesday, September 21, 2004 - link
#47 - What RAM Stick are you using? I have never seen any review out there that have been able to push these timing at 245Mhz FSB...eva2000 - Monday, September 20, 2004 - link
awesome review.. just got my DFI Lanparty UT NF3-250Gb 3 days ago and posted results at http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=142 with my AMD64 3400+ @ 11x 245HTT = 2695mhz and ram at 245mhz 2-2-2-6 1T !JustAnAverageGuy - Sunday, September 12, 2004 - link
"With our stock 3200+ and ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, the DFI is one of the better 2nd generation 754 boards. Standard performance tests demonstrate the DFI LANParty UT is very competitive with other recent Athlon 64 boards in Direct X 9 games, which is all we would expect. UT2004 and Far Cry include results from Socket 939 and Intel 775 for comparison. Since both the 939 and 775 results were with faster CPUs running an nVidia 6800 Ultra AGP 8X/PCIe, it is remarkable that the scores are as close as they are."I nearly missed that paragraph. Perhaps you should make it stand out a little better?
Cygni - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - link
If it does come in around that price point, DFI will move ALOT of these things...