Intel Processors - Celeron

While AMD continues to push Sempron out to the world, Intel has rather quietly upgraded their Celeron lineup with a new core (Prescott) to help boost its viability in budget desktop systems. Ever since this core change, the Celeron has had new life breathed into it in such a way that makes it a chip worth choosing, if high-end performance is not of paramount importance. It also helps that these chips still operate on socket 478 and would not invoke the high costs of 775.

The Intel Celeron D (478) 330, which is a 2.66GHz processor, is more than sufficient for basic desktop use and competes well with AMD's Sempron lineup of processors. Likewise, this processor is priced at a level that should be affordable to even the most budget-conscience users out there.

Intel Celeron D (478) 330 120 Day Analysis



Intel Processors – Socket 478 AMD Motherboards – NVIDIA nForce 2
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chadder007 - Friday, November 19, 2004 - link

    "N'wood S478 3.4c $133 more than 3.4 Prescott. Unbelievable. You can see what people are buying. intel should continue with N'wood and S478. "

    I agree about Socket 478....Intel didn't care to give those users too much of an upgrade path and just jumped all over to the new socket way too soon with little justification to do so.
  • qballshalls2002 - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    Still waiting for the nForce4 boards to show before I go slurging again. Hehehe!
  • aw - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    Haha...sorry...I meant if you were trying to get to 1:1 DDR600 like a lot of Anandtechers are inclined to do. My DDR is bigger than your DDR

    ;-)
  • jmke - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    " The only thing that will hold it back is the quality of your RAM... "

    most A64 boards features excellent memory:htt(fsb) dividers, and the impact on performance versus running memory at 1:1 is minimal
  • aw - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    I agree with #8. My new 3000+ easily hits 2.4ghz which makes it $160 3800+. The only thing that will hold it back is the quality of your RAM...
  • arswihart - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    why get Athlon64 3200+ 90nm instead of 3000+? Can't they both overclock the same, as shown in Anand's own tests?
  • bofkentucky - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    In the 9xx board section, its is the intel 915 chipset, not 912.
  • Pumpkinierre - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    N'wood S478 3.4c $133 more than 3.4 Prescott. Unbelievable. You can see what people are buying. intel should continue with N'wood and S478.
  • PseudoKnight - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    The Athlon XP 2800+ is flipping me off. I'm scared.
  • slurmsmackenzie - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    how come the 915 chipset isn't listed? it offers pci-e without the conversion to ddr2? anandtech always puts the emphasis on the fact that an upgrade to 775 is an entire system overhaul, when 915 offers the meager upgrade of processor/mobo, or cpu/mobo/video card without a performance drop from 925x. so why a 925x board is suggested for price/performance efficiency is beyond me.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now