Gaming Performance: 4K

All of our game testing results, including other resolutions, can be found in our benchmark database: www.anandtech.com/bench. All gaming tests were with an RTX 2080 Ti.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Civilization VI

(b-5) Civilization VI - 4K Min - Average FPS

(b-6) Civilization VI - 4K Min - 95th Percentile

Final Fantasy 14

(d-3) Final Fantasy 14 - 4K Min - Average FPS

Final Fantasy 15

(e-5) Final Fantasy 15 - 4K Standard - Average FPS

(e-6) Final Fantasy 15 - 4K Standard - 95th Percentile

World of Tanks

(f-7) World of Tanks - 4K Max - Average FPS

(f-8) World of Tanks - 4K Max - 95th Percentile

Borderlands 3

(g-5) Borderlands 3 - 4K VLow - Average FPS

(g-6) Borderlands 3 - 4K VLow - 95th Percentile

Far Cry 5

(i-5) Far Cry 5 - 4K Low - Average FPS

(i-6) Far Cry 5 - 4K Low - 95th Percentile

Gears Tactics

(j-5) Gears Tactics - 4K Low - Average FPS

(j-6) Gears Tactics - 4K Low - 95th Percentile

Grand Theft Auto V

(k-5) Grand Theft Auto V - 4K Low - Average FPS

(k-6) Grand Theft Auto V - 4K Low - 95th Percentile

Strange Brigade (DirectX 12)

(m-5) Strange Brigade DX12 - 4K Low - Average FPS

(m-6) Strange Brigade DX12 - 4K Low - 95th Percentile

Strange Brigade (Vulkan)

(n-5) Strange Brigade Vulkan - 4K Low - Average FPS

(n-6) Strange Brigade Vulkan - 4K Low - 95th Percentile

When gaming at 4K resolutions, the Core i9-12900KS performs very well, although the Core i9-12900K does outperform it in a couple of games. It's also worth noting that in our game benchmark suite, the Core i9-12900KS for the better part, actually outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, but the latter almost certain wins in situations where more L3 cache is favored by the game title.

Gaming Performance: 1080p Conclusion
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • fazalmajid - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Meh. What I want is a HEDT CPU with only P-cores, and AVX-512 re-enabled as a result. Perhaps Sapphire Rapids will deliver that.
  • nandnandnand - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    Fishhawk Falls, Q4 launch maybe.

    https://www.notebookcheck.net/16-cores-32-threads-...
    https://wccftech.com/intel-hedt-sapphire-rapids-w7...
  • Silver5urfer - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    HEDT is dead.

    Intel won't release an X299 successor. Their new Sapphire Rapids based HEDT is W, Workstation class. Meaning Prosumer just like Threadripper Pro. So expect a super high premium asking price.

    Gaming and Mobile industry killed HEDT. Nowadays most of them spend more time on their junk Smartphone consuming all the stupid Social media drama and etc. So PC users are only relegated to those so called "Gaming" which is mostly - Fortnite, Pubg, COD Warzone, Apex Legends. All this garbage. Not SP games. And Windows 11 direction is also more geared towards mobile UI.

    All in all HEDT is essentially gone.
  • brucethemoose - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    I disagree, as I think the core count wars killed HEDT.

    No game I know of (other than one beta MMO) can fully saturate a top end consumer CPU these days. And most workloads will get done *reasonably* quickly on a 12900KS or 5950X.

    You need more? Well thats what the P/W series is for. There's a lot of fixed-cost overhead designing something like X299 or TR4, and I don't think the volume justifies it over just making some workstationy motherboards/CPUs on a heavily amortized server socket.
  • StevoLincolnite - Friday, July 29, 2022 - link

    My old 3930K from over 10 years ago is still playing the latest and greatest games just fine. Overclocks like a champ too.
    Running Ryzen 9 at the moment with 64GB of Ram.

    But Quad Channel+6 Core/12 threads is what gave it that longevity because it's a HEDT platform.

    Fast forward to today... They essentially just moved HEDT chips onto consumer platforms and dialed up the core counts... Which is why the price points of high-end Ryzen 9 can align itself to older HEDT chip price brackets of old.

    There just isn't a dedicated socket for it anymore... Or Quad channel memory.
  • michael2k - Saturday, July 30, 2022 - link

    I don’t think it’s possible to make a CPU faster anymore until Intel gets to 4nm; it just takes too much power.

    So their only choice is wider and more cores. Apple is a node ahead and will probably hit 3nm next year when Intel hits 4nm.
  • StevoLincolnite - Sunday, July 31, 2022 - link

    Keep in mind that nodes are not directly comparable based upon pure marketing nomenclature.

    Intel 7nm for example is absolutely superior to TSMC or Samsung 7nm in actual feature sizes.
  • michael2k - Sunday, July 31, 2022 - link

    Yes you are correct but also irrelevant. Intel 7 may be superior to TSMC 7 but inferior to TSMC 5 or TSMC 5P
  • Zoolook - Monday, August 1, 2022 - link

    I guess you mean Intel 7, which is their renamed 10nm, and it's debatable, Intel 7 never reached their initial proposed logical density and in comparisons of chips they seem to have less than 10% lead in density and their volume production launched years after TSMC and it's clearly worse in power efficiency.
    TSMC is gearing up volume production on N3 which is a year ahead of Intels comparable (projected density) Intel 4 process.
  • michael2k - Saturday, July 30, 2022 - link

    It’s funny how Apple still has a ‘jest’ CPU; 16 pcores and 4 ecores in the M1 Ultra.

    But AMD still sells a 16 core part too:
    https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m1-ult...

    https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-9-59...

    The real question is if core counts will go up with the M2 Ultra; adding 2 p cores to the M2 Max (10/2) would give the M2 Ultra 20/4

    The problem Intel and AMD have is that their power draw is so high it gets hard to add more cores and still cool the part.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now