After the initial success with overclocking nVidia's combination wonder, the Riva TNT, there were quite a few requests to perform a more in-depth analysis of what the future may hold for nVidia and their flagship product. The overclocking experiment was a startling success, however many questions remained unanswered. | |
Next year, when nVidia does chose to launch their TNT product at 125MHz, what will the speed of the on-board RAM be? Will the 0.25 micron design allow for greater overclocking possibilities? How about greater resolutions at the 125MHz clock speed? Taking a second look at the AnandTech Exclusive, let's answer these questions as we bust out the cooling system for another trial run. |
125MPH in a 110MPH Zone
That was the problem with the original tests, if you notice the results overclocking the Canopus Spectra 2500 produced, the performance barrier seemed to be at around the 110MHz limit. The 20MHz increase in clock speed resulted in a tremendous 13% performance increase, however bumping the clock speed up to 125MHz, a full 15MHz increase in clock speed, only resulted in a 20% improvement over the scores at the default 90MHz clock speed, and a meager 7% increase over the scores at 110MHz.
The reason? The memory clock of the TNT card remained at 110MHz, the default set forth and recommended by nVidia. By overclocking the chip to a level above 110MHz we were essentially ruining the balance of power between the speed at which the TNT can process the data and the speed at which the RAM can retrieve it. Normally, with the TNT clocked at 90MHz and the memory clocked at 110MHz, the TNT can process all geometry data and retrieve data from the local [graphics] memory in an efficient manner. When the overclocking was performed, the speed of the processor was increased, without compensating for this performance increase by upping the clock speed of the memory. This explains the diminishing returns once the TNT's clock speed surpassed the speed of the memory.
Removing the Bottleneck
With the memory clock established as the bottleneck in this case, what is there left to do than remove it? That is easier said than done. When the TNT is released at full speed in February of next year you can expect it to ship with considerably faster SDRAM or even SGRAM depending on the cost of the chips at the time of production. While the actual clock speed may vary, we should be able to expect that the memory will run at a speed considerably greater than 125MHz, therefore eliminating the bottleneck we just discussed. Unfortunately, the availability of such high speed SDRAM is close to nothing for the price point most TNT cards will be selling for, meaning it is unlikely that we'll be able to overclock the RAM on most TNT cards too far beyond the recommended levels.
0 Comments
View All Comments