Encoding Performance

One of the interesting elements of modern processors is encoding performance. This covers two main areas: encryption/decryption for secure data transfer and video transcoding from one video format to another.

In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data—a process that more modern devices are adopting to improve software security.

We've updated our list of encoding benchmarks for our 2024 CPU suite to include some of the most relevant and recent codecs, such as AV1 and HEVC. Not only this, but we have also WebP2 image encoding into the mix to show not only how the latest processors perform with these codecs but also to show discrepancies in performance throughout the different segments.

(3-1) WebP2 Image Encode: Q7, CE7

(3-2): SVT AV1 Encoding: Bosphorus 1080p, Fastest Preset

(3-2b): SVT AV1 Encoding: Bosphorus 4K, Fastest Preset

(3-3) SVT AV1 Encoding: Bosphorus 1080p, Mid Preset

(3-3b) SVT AV1 Encoding: Bosphorus 4K, Mid Preset

(3-4) Dav1d AV1 Benchmark, Summer Nature 4K

(3-5) SVT-HEVC Encoding: Bosphorus 1080p, HQ

(3-5b) SVT-HEVC Encoding: Bosphorus 4K, HQ

(3-9) 7-Zip 22.01 - Compression Rating

(3-9b) 7-Zip 22.01 - Decompression Rating

Moving onto the encoding section of our CPU test suite, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 performs very well for the most part, including in our AV1 benchmarks at 4K, although it was a battle against the Phoenix Point based Ryzen 9 7940HS. However, the 7940HS had slightly more power available to it (35 W vs. 28 W), which shows that the difference between Zen 5/Zen 5c and Zen 4 cores didn't prove too different regarding our encoding tests.

System & Storage Performance Rendering & Simulation Performance
Comments Locked

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dante Verizon - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    Why are you comparing an ultra-thin design to a CPU with PL2 at almost 90w? The notebookcheck tests show that the Zenbook runs up to 50% slower than the ProArt chassy.
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    Sorry, which notebook are you referring to? We have multiple Zenbooks here.
  • Terry_Craig - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    He's probably talking about the Zenbook in the review: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-S-16-la...

    Strix performs much worse on the Zenbook than inside the ProArt, probably due to more aggressive power and temperature management.
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    It's definitely not a high performance chassis, despite being 16-inches. The default TDP is just 17 Watts; AMD asked reviewers to bump it up to 28W.

    But this is what AMD sent out for review. Given the wide range of laptop TDPs out there, these review unit laptops can never cover the full spectrum. So it's more a reflection of what power level/form factor the chipmaker is choosing to prioritize in this generation.
  • The Hardcard - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    What is the 90W laptop in this review? The other laptops are listed at 28W and 35W here. I did not see any indication of the power specifications of the ProArt on the other site, just some numbers provided. I strongly suspect that laptop is running at top TDP, 45-54W.

    So, like, a different comparison.
  • Terry_Craig - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-P...

    Depending on the model, the 7940HS goes up to 100w.
  • The Hardcard - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    But, is the 7940HS pulling 100w in this review instead of the reported 35w? Otherwise,, what is the point of the complaint?

    https://www.ultrabookreview.com/69005-asus-proart-...

    The HX 370 is in a different chassis pulling 80w sustained. Does that make the 35w vs 28w happening here more fair? I mean, if what the chips can draw elsewhere somehow matters here at all?
  • eastcoast_pete - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    It matters if one wants to look at the maximum performance possible, regardless of power draw. But, in addition to what Ryan wrote, the attraction of the HX Series to me is the strong performance at lower power draws. I would have actually liked to see performance comparisons at 17 W, which IMHO is of special interest in such thin and light notebooks. The higher end (> 50 W) will be if interest for Strict Halo, which as far as I can tell is supposed to take on notebooks with smaller dGPUs.
  • ET - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    From the benchmarks here, the 370 looks somewhat disappointing on the CPU front, with some losses to 8 cores Zen 4. A hybrid architecture is always a problem. I wonder if future scheduling changes will help or if the small 8MB L3 for the Zen 5c cores is a problem that can't be overcome.

    The new GPU however looks like a good upgrade over the previous gen.
  • nandnandnand - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    It's hybrid with different cache amounts, but it's also two CCXs instead of one after 3.5 generations of simple 8-cores. It's hard to say what's screwing it up.

    Phoronix's review was more positive for the CPU. The main benefit is power efficiency:
    https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-...

    The reviews I looked at didn't look too good for the GPU. Maybe it will do better with more power, but what it really needs is memory bandwidth. Hopefully AMD brings some Infinity Cache to its mainstream 128-bit APUs in the future.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now