CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering & Simulation

Rendering tests, compared to others, are often a little more simple to digest and automate. All the tests put out some sort of score or time, usually in an obtainable way that makes it fairly easy to extract. These tests are some of the most strenuous in our list, due to the highly threaded nature of rendering and ray-tracing, and can draw a lot of power.

If a system is not properly configured to deal with the processor's thermal requirements, the rendering benchmarks are where it would show most easily as the frequency drops over a sustained period of time. Most benchmarks, in this case, are re-run several times, and the key to this is having an appropriate idle/wait time between benchmarks to allow temperatures to normalize from the last test.

Also in this section are our simulation-based tests, including our typical gaming simulation benchmarks, which consist of our Dwarf Fortress and Factorio benchmarks.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 3.6: BMW27 (CPU Only)

(4-1b) Blender 3.6: Classroom (CPU Only)

(4-1c) Blender 3.6: Fishy Cat (CPU Only)

(4-1d) Blender 3.6: Pabellon Barcelona (CPU Only)

(4-2) CineBench R23: Single Thread

(4-2b) CineBench R23: Multi Threaded

(4-3) CineBench 2024: Single Thread

(4-3b) CineBench 2024: Multi Thread

(4-5) V-Ray 5.0.2 Benchmark: CPU

(4-6) POV-Ray 3.7.1

In rendering, especially in single-threaded scenarios, Zen 5 does have an advantage over Zen 4, especially in both iterations of Cinebench. Multi-threaded performance over Zen 4 core for core, so the Ryzen 7 9700X vs the Ryzen 7 7700m, there's really not much in it at all. Zen 5 wins single-threaded, but in multi-threaded workloads that aren't AVX-512 enabled, then there's no major difference.

Simulation

(5-1) y-cruncher 0.8.2.9523: ST (5M Pi)

(5-1b) y-cruncher 0.8.2.9523: MT (5M Pi)

(5-2) 3D Particle Movement v2.1: Non-AVX

(5-2b) 3D Particle Movement v2.1: Peak AVX

(5-6) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(5-6b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(5-6c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(5-7) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(5-7b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(5-7c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

(5-9) 3DMark CPU Profile Benchmark v1.1: 1 x Thread

(5-9b) 3DMark CPU Profile Benchmark v1.1: 8 x Threads

(5-9c) 3DMark CPU Profile Benchmark v1.1: Max Threads

In the Y-cruncher single-threaded Pi calculation, Zen 5 is streets ahead of the completion, as the full 512-bit data path for AVX-512 instructions opens up some of that untapped raw performance. On the other hand, without the AVX-512, or in highly multi-threaded scenarios, both the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X compete with the rest of the chips on test at an even keel.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding CPU Benchmark Performance: AI Performance
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Golgatha777 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Thanks for the review. I personally would have liked to see a 7800X3D in the benchmarks. Also, I would have omitted 720p and replaced it with 1440p gaming benchmarks. 1080p is perfectly fine for a synthetic benchmark to see which CPU is faster overall and a lot of gamers run 1440p.
  • kpb321 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Agreed. The 7800X3D should be very close in price to the 9700X so having both in the gaming charts would be pretty nice. Offhand I assume it will be a mix. For standard game the 9700x should have a small lead due to the Zen 5 improvements. For things that are cache sensitive that will make the 7800X3D more competitive or even faster.
  • heffeque - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    It doesn't make sense.
    The 7800X3D should be compared to the 9800X3D (which will come in a few months).
  • Trackster11230 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    It makes sense to compare the 7800X3D to the 9700X due to price, and I'm sure it'll be compared against the 9800X3D when it comes out too. These aren't mutually exclusive.
  • Klober - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Seriously? Did none of you pay attention to the charts? There's clearly a 7800X3D in all but 2 of the charts on this page alone. I could maybe see an argument made for the 7900X3D (coincidentally, the CPU I have which I why I noted it's missing) but not the 7800X3D.
  • Trackster11230 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Yes, I see it in the charts, hence my comment about it making sense being in here. It's similar in price to the 9700X, so it makes sense to compare from that metric. What's so difficult to understand?

    I could make an argument too that an 8c/16t CPU makes more sense to compare to than the 7900X3D with 12c/24t.
  • boozed - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Seems odd that the gaming CPU is missing from the gaming results
  • boozed - Thursday, August 8, 2024 - link

    "Note: We are currently benchmarking more processors as we speak"

    I should read harder
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, August 16, 2024 - link

    They said that they would re-test the Intel chips over the weekend in May. Did those updated benchmarks ever get done and published?
  • frshi - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    The table says Quad Channel DDR support, I don't think that's true. It's 4 slots but it's dual channel, isn't it?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now