NVIDIA’s GeForce GTS 450: Pushing Fermi In To The Mainstream
by Ryan Smith on September 13, 2010 12:02 AM EST- Posted in
- NVIDIA
- Fermi
- GeForce GTS 450
- GF106
- GPUs
Crysis: Warhead
Kicking things off as always is Crysis: Warhead, still the toughest game in our benchmark suite.Even 2 years since the release of the original Crysis, “but can it run Crysis?” is still an important question.
Ideally, NVIDIA would like the GTS 450 to be able to play everything at 1680x1050 at high settings with 4x anti-aliasing. Crysis of course eludes this, just as it does all attempts to play it at a decent framerate. Even the factory overclocked cards can’t muster 30fps here. For that we have to drop our settings to Gamer quality without AA.
Overall, at reference clocks the GTS 450 doesn’t fare so well here. At our standard 1680 setting it just falls to the Radeon HD 5750, and is miles away from the 5770. At Gamer quality it switches positions with the 5750, but still has quite a gap with the 5770. However the overclocked cards fare much better here, and they can bring the GTS 450 up to parity with the 5770. Since the cheapest 5770s are selling for no more than the GTS 450, ideally it (or its overclocked variants) need to be able to keep up with the 5770.
When it comes to minimum framerates the GTS 450 does a bit better here by edging out the 5750, but it takes a factory overclocked card to beat the 5770.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
66 Comments
View All Comments
FragKrag - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
Why isn't there a SC2 bench? :(I saw them on the laptop reviews and expected them here :(((((
Ryan Smith - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
Because of the vast number of cards in our library, we only refresh the GPU test suite twice a year. It will get refreshed later this fall, and SC2 is a very likely candidate.Gomez Addams - Sunday, September 19, 2010 - link
When you do your refresh please include older cards like the GTX285 and those of its era. I find it helpful to be able to evaluate whether a video card update will be of any value. So far, it would be of very little value.ronnybrendel - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1408/11/eanazag - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
Regretfully, I am patiently waiting for the test suite refresh.Leyawiin - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
Prior to Newegg pulling them there were lower priced ones at $130 going up to $140. Its true if you play the rebate game you can get an HD 5770 at that price, but what's coming out of your pocket on the day you buy is generally $140-150. HD 5750s are sitting at $120-140. GTX 460 768MBs are down to $170 (no rebate) so the pressure seems to be on the Radeons as much as the GTS 450. The HD 5750 is almost a useless purchase when the others are clustered so closely to its price point.iwodo - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
It is too bad that we wont get a 28nm die shrink of the Fermi soon. But it seems the logical plan for Nvidia is to work on Frequency and Bandwidth.You mention Nvidia has a relatively poor Memory Controller for GDDR5 and that is why it had to use 384bit MC where 256 from a ATI design would be enough.
It we get a MC upgrade, + some better Frequency Headroom, and unlock the last bit of the SP, Nvidia should be able to counter the Northen Island coming in 2 - 3 months time.
As that would be the best we can get with 40nm limit and respin of Fermi.
DMisner - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
How does the 450 stand up to the 250 in power consumption and general gaming performance.Also, any word on how many PPD the GTS 450 will get in Folding@Home?
lecaf - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
heyin all these benchmarks the 450 beats the 460 is that right ?
I've took a look at tomshardware review and there the 460 wins.
Did I miss-look at something or the figures are wrong?
Ryan Smith - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link
Where are you seeing the GTS 450 beating the GTX 460?