All scores are Time in Seconds, Lower is Better

image004.gif (6363 bytes)

As we've come to learn and expect, L2 cache speed has a weak effect on image editing applications. There is a difference between the 1/2 and 1/3 L2 cache dividers, but the L2 cache performance improvement is really more dependent on the size of the L2 cache than the speed. For this reason, an Athlon 600 with a 200MHz L2 cache (1/3) outperforms an Athlon 550 with a 275MHz L2 cache (1/2) and so on and so forth.

Photoshop 4.0.1

Athlon 500/166

81.29

Athlon 500/250

79.62

Athlon 550/183

74.42

Athlon 550/275

73.07

Athlon 600/200

71.44

Athlon 600/300

69.22

Athlon 650/217

66.98

Athlon 650/325

66.93

Athlon 700/233

63.85

Athlon 700/350

62.9

Athlon 750/250

60.32

 

image006.gif (5790 bytes)

A similar situation is present in the CorelDRAW test; the results mirror those of the Photoshop test from above.

CorelDRAW 8.0

Athlon 500/166

180.02

Athlon 500/250

175.23

Athlon 550/183

165.33

Athlon 550/275

161.86

Athlon 600/200

153.37

Athlon 600/300

149.1

Athlon 650/217

143.9

Athlon 650/325

139.64

Athlon 700/233

135.97

Athlon 700/350

129.45

Athlon 750/250

128.95

Overall System Performance - SYSMark 98 3D Rendering Performance
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now