ATI Radeon 64MB DDR

by Matthew Witheiler on July 17, 2000 9:00 AM EST

We have seen 1280x1024 become a more and more playable resolution for many with the arrival of the GeForce 2 GTS. Luckily for gamers out there wanting to run at this resolution, the Radeon makes this resolution even more accessible. While the card may get dominated at 16-bit color, as we have found in previous benchmarks, it actually surpasses the prior king, the GeForce 2 GTS, when in 32-bit color mode.

Running at 51.3 FPS, the Radeon 64MB DDR was able to perform 13.2% better than the GeForce 2 GTS 32MB and 3.8% better than the 64MB GeForce 2 GTS. At 1280x1024x32, the Radeon becomes the new king of the hill.

1600x1200 is still a resolution that many dream of but few run in. At 16-bit color, the Radeon is crippled, as it always is, by the poor performance at this color depth. When cranked up to 32-bit color, we find that the Radeon actually surpasses the GeForce 2 GTS. The card was able to perform 11.6% faster than the GeForce 2 GTS 64MB and 21.8% faster than the 32MB GeForce 2 GTS, proving that the Radeon truly excels at high resolutions and colors.

Quake III Arena - Athlon 750 Quake III Arena - Pentium III 550E
Comments Locked

2 Comments

View All Comments

  • Thatguy97 - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    ahh i remember anadtechs jihad against ati

    wow im dating myself
  • Frumious1 - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    I don't remember it at all. The only thing I recall is a bunch of whiny ass fanboys complaining when their chosen CPU, GPU, etc. didn't get massive amounts of acclaim. The very first Radeon cards were good, but they weren't necessarily superior to the competition. You want a good Radeon release, that would be the 9700 Pro and later 9800 Pro -- those beat Nvidia hands down, and AnandTech said as much.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now