MyDigitalSSD BP4 2.5" & mSATA (240GB) Review
by Kristian Vättö on April 3, 2013 11:13 AM ESTFinal Words
There's one thing that tells more about the BP4 than anything else: price. There's no SSD that can really challenge it in price if we look at all available capacities and I even tried to gather budget SSDs in the table below. Especially the 240GB BP4 at $160 is a brilliant deal as 240GB/256GB SSDs are commonly in the $200 range. Sure there are sales every now and then and I've seen the 250GB Samsung 840 hitting $150 but keep in mind that MyDigitalSSD's prices are not temporary—they are retail prices and are unlikely to change dramatically (at least not by going up).
Price Comparison (4/3/2013) | |||
Capacity | 120/128GB | 240/256GB | 480/512GB |
MyDigitalSSD BP4 | $90 | $160 | $350 |
MyDigitalSSD BP4 mSATA | $110 | $180 | N/A |
MyDigitalSSD BP3 mSATA | $100 | $180 | N/A |
Samsung SSD 840 | $100 | $210 | $350 |
Corsair Neutron | $120 | $210 | N/A |
OCZ Agility 4 | $115 | $200 | N/A |
Mushkin Chronos | $110 | $180 | $360 |
Intel SSD 525 | $170 | $290 | N/A |
Crucial M4 mSATA | $130 | $210 | N/A |
Mushkin Atlas | $115 | $190 | N/A |
Of course, you always have to trade off performance for price. The BP4 is not the fastest SSD we have tested and most of the other SATA 6Gbps SSDs are faster, but the BP4 is not terribly slow. Any SSD (well, almost) is still much faster than a traditional hard drive so simply having an SSD is far more important than the brand or performance of the SSD.
We have seen some pretty bad budget SSDs over the years, such as Crucial v4 and OCZ Agility 4, but the BP4 is miles ahead. Typically budget SSDs have one big Achilles' Heel (oftentimes write performance due to the use of lower quality NAND) but the BP4 has none. Random IO performance is average, IO consistency is good and power consumption is great. I literally can't find any weak points in the BP4. There are aspects that could be better, such as random read/write speeds, but after all we are dealing with a budget SSD and I don't think it's even reasonable to expect high-end SSD performance.
The only question is long-term reliability. When a relatively unknown player steps into the market, it always takes at least a generation or two before any sort of reliability can be determined. MyDigitalSSD is claiming that their reliability is on par with Intel but I would take manufacturers' words with a grain of salt. That said, I haven't seen enough MyDigitalSSD's drives around to draw any scientific conclusions of their reliability but on the other hand, I haven't had any issues with mine nor have I heard of anyone else having issues. Only time will tell how the reliability plays out but then again, we also need a sufficient sample size as reliability can't be determined unless people actually buy and use the product. While the unknown reliability is definitely a con, I don't think it should be taken too seriously. Any drive can fail so you should always have a backup regardless of what your primary drive is.
All in all, I have no reason not to recommend the BP4. For once the price/performance ratio is reasonable as most of the time budget SSDs fail due to the fact that the price isn't cheap enough to compensate for the lack of performance. I would still choose Samsung SSD 840 over the BP4 if the price is the same, mainly because the SSD 840 is slightly faster and its reliability is more proven, but I wouldn't consider the SSD 840 to be worth much more (maybe ~$10-20).
All MyDigitalSSD needs to do now is to get their name out in the public as I'm sure not many have heard of them before. Expanding their sales channel to more vendors would be a good start because in the end you will always be limited in visibility if you only rely on Amazon and your own online store (although I do see the the enticement of keeping the distribution channel as simple as possible and it definitely helps to keep the prices low). I'm sure MyDigitalSSD has considered many options and made their decisions based on what's best for the company, but there's no doubt that the BP4 could be a great vehicle for taking a bigger slice of the market.
35 Comments
View All Comments
CoryS - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
Everyday I check for the HTC One review, and frown :(epoon2 - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
supply chain issue lolMadMan007 - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
Anandtech seems to have one though, they've included it in recent Android graphics benchmark charts.thesavvymage - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
they have one for sure, anand posted his thoughts on it. In that article theyve said that they are working on their reviewalexvoda - Thursday, April 4, 2013 - link
Unfortunately I lost all my interest in the HTC One ofter this:http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/HTC+One+Teardown/13...
I find such construction method inexcusable.
SSDuser101 - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
I can attest to the quality and support. I have a original BP3 from 2011 and see no reason to upgrade or change. These drives are BulletProof as the name suggests. Also followed lots of posts on Notebookreview about the drives and whenever there was a problem they fixed it. For example there was a bug with the W500 and EP121 that was pointed out and it was fixed within 4 weeks. Also they had a problem with the FW of the BP3 in early 2012 that only effected the 64GB mSATA SSD and that got fixed as well. And as far as drives dieing in the filed you will be hard pressed to find anyone who has had one brick on them. 2 thumbs up for MyDigitalSSD.Samus - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
I've had a mSATA BP3 in my Elitebook Folio 9470 for about a year. Haven't had any problems...sometimes a simple controller design is better. Sandforce is ridiculously complex with a lot of things that can go wrong. With the exception of the Intel SSD 330, every Sandforce drive I've ever owned has given me problems.Johny12 - Thursday, April 4, 2013 - link
Samus, I too have had problems with my SF based SSDs earlier. But since I have started using Intel 5xx series of SSDs, my opinion about SF has changed ridiculously. I think only the first generation of their SSDs had some compatibility issues across SSD manufacturers. I am excited to hear about their yet to be launched 3rd gen controllers :DMyDigitalSSD - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
Hi all Matt from MyDigitalSSD here. Thanks you for the great review. I would like to let everyone know there is a large shortage of flash in the market right now and it may be 2-3 weeks until inventory on this items is flowing again. So whatever you find on the market right now is it for about 2-3 weeks. Not the best timing for such a thing but just wanted to give a heads up for those of you wondering why you cannot find stock readily available.jhoff80 - Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - link
So, would you say that mSATA drives are generally proportional to their 2.5" counterparts? It sounds like they use the same controller, and the same flash chips (albeit fewer).For example, looking at 4KB random writes, the Intel 525 is third in performance. Would that also presumably mean that the mSATA variety of the Intel 525 would be one of the top mSATA performers?
My guess is that no, you can't assume that, but with so few sites with extensive mSATA benchmarks (and even here, there's only a couple that have been tested) it's hard to determine which is best and it'd be nice to have some way to figure it out other than guessing.