Synology RS10613xs+: 10GbE 10-bay Rackmount NAS Review
by Ganesh T S on December 26, 2013 3:11 AM EST- Posted in
- NAS
- Synology
- Enterprise
Miscellaneous Factors and Final Words
The Synology RS10613xs+ is a 10-bay NAS, and there are many applicable disk configurations (JBOD / RAID-0 / RAID-1 / RAID-5 / RAID-6 / RAID-10). Most users looking for a balance between performance and redundancy are going to choose RAID-5. Hence, we performed all our expansion / rebuild duration testing as well as power consumption recording with the unit configured in RAID-5 mode. The disks used for benchmarking (OCZ Vector 120 GB) were also used in this section. The table below presents the average power consumption of the unit as well as time taken for various RAID-related activities.
RS10613xs+ RAID Expansion and Rebuild / Power Consumption | ||||||
Activity | Duration (HH:MM:SS) | Power Consumption (Outlet 1 / W) | Power Consumption (Outlet 2 / W) | Total Power Consumption (W) | ||
Diskless | 52.9 | 67.4 | 120.3 | |||
Single Disk Initialization | 46.5 | 61.61 | 108.11 | |||
RAID-0 to RAID-1 (116 GB to 116 GB / 1 to 2 Drives) | 0:30:05 | 44.4 | 59.37 | 103.77 | ||
RAID-1 to RAID-5 (116 GB to 233 GB / 2 to 3 Drives) | 0:37:53 | 49.82 | 65.91 | 115.73 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (233 GB to 350 GB / 3 to 4 Drives) | 00:24:10 | 54.42 | 70.98 | 125.4 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (350 GB to 467 GB / 4 to 5 Drives) | 00:21:40 | 57.61 | 74.29 | 131.9 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (467 GB to 584 GB / 5 to 6 Drives) | 00:21:10 | 61.1 | 78.29 | 139.39 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (584 GB to 700 GB / 6 to 7 Drives) | 00:21:10 | 63.77 | 81.23 | 145 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (700 GB to 817 GB / 7 to 8 Drives) | 00:20:41 | 66.8 | 85 | 151.8 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (817 GB to 934 GB / 8 to 9 Drives) | 00:22:41 | 67.92 | 86.16 | 154.08 | ||
RAID-5 Expansion (934 GB to 1051 GB / 9 to 10 Drives) | 00:25:11 | 69.34 | 87.36 | 156.7 | ||
RAID-5 Rebuild (1168 GB to 1285 GB / 9 to 10 drives) | 00:19:33 | 59.78 | 76.6 | 136.38 |
Unlike Atom-based units, RAID expansion and rebuild don't seem to take progressively longer as the number of disks increase.
Coming to the business end of the review, the Synology RS10613xs+ manages to tick all the right boxes in its market segment. Support for both SAS and SATA disks ensures compatibility with the requirements of a wide variety of SMBs and SMEs. We have not even covered some exciting SMB-targeted features in DSM such as Synology High Availability (which uses a dedicated second unit as a seamless failover replacement) and official support for multiple virtualization solutions including VMWare, Citrix and Hyper-V.
A couple of weeks back, Synology introduced the follow-up SATA-only RS3614xs+ with 12-bays and slots for up to two 10G NICs. Compared to the advertised 2000 MBps for the RS10613xs+, the RS3614xs+ can go up to 3200 MBps and 620K IOPS. Given Synology's commitment to the this lineup, SMBs looking for enterprise features in their storage server would do little wrong in going with Synology's xs+ series for the perfect mid-point between a NAS and a SAN.
51 Comments
View All Comments
Qiasfah - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - link
The text rendering with the tables and text is messed up in the mobile version :(Ryan Smith - Friday, December 27, 2013 - link
Qiasfah, thank you for letting us know. The article has been tweaked to keep that from happening.YoshoMasaki - Saturday, December 28, 2013 - link
The drop down box I'm seeing on WP8 goes off my screen, and changing the selection doesn't change the graph. The usual button type picker you use for SSD reviews and such works fine.ErrantOpinion - Monday, December 30, 2013 - link
The drop downs work in Internet Explorer, but not Chrome/Opera 15+ for me.Ryan Smith - Tuesday, December 31, 2013 - link
Fixed. Sorry about that. I hadn't tested that code on Chrome.P_Dub_S - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - link
Who uses RAID 5 now a days? All the research I have done points to OBR10. Can we see some OBR10 numbers?Here are some articles that explain why RAID 5 needs to die.
http://www.smbitjournal.com/2012/07/hot-spare-or-a...
http://www.smbitjournal.com/2012/11/one-big-raid-1...
http://www.smbitjournal.com/2012/05/when-no-redund...
hydromike - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - link
Tons of people still use RAID 5 in the enterprise. Further more lets call it by its real name RAID 10 instead of OBR10. You can get even further redundancy from RAID 50, RAID 60 and RAID 100.P_Dub_S - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - link
And when you go to rebuild that huge RAID 5 array and another disk fails your screwed.xxsk8er101xx - Friday, December 27, 2013 - link
Not if you setup a global spare.Gigaplex - Saturday, December 28, 2013 - link
It still needs to rebuild when it switches over to the spare.