IDE RAID Comparison

by Matthew Witheiler on June 18, 2001 4:31 AM EST

The Test

Windows 2000 Test System

Hardware

CPU(s) AMD Duron 850MHz
Motherboard(s) Gigabyte GA-7DX
Memory 128MB PC2100 Corsair DDR SDRAM
Hard Drive

IBM Deskstar 30GB 75GXP 7200RPM Ultra ATA/100

CDROM

Phillips 48X

Video Card(s)

NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS 64MB

RAID Card(s)

Adaptec AAA-UDMA

AMI MegaRAID 100

Iwill SIDE RAID100

Promise FastTrak100
Promise SuperTrak100

Ethernet

Linksys LNE100TX 100Mbit PCI Ethernet Adapter

Software

Operating System

Windows 2000 SP1

Video Drivers

NVIDIA Detonator3 6.50

Benchmarking Applications

 

Intel Iometer 1999.10.20 beta
Ziff Davis Content Creation Winstone 2001

Iometer: Understanding the Results Software RAID vs. Hardware RAID: Behind the Scenes
Comments Locked

2 Comments

View All Comments

  • kburrows - Thursday, December 4, 2003 - link

    Have you run any tests on any onboard RAID solutions for RAID 0 & 1? I would love to see the results posted for the new SATA RAID on the Intel 875 boards.
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, August 17, 2003 - link

    In adressing the performance of an raid array with different stripe sizes, you miss an important factor, namely the accestime of an disk. This wait time has two main couses. First the head positioning and second the rotational latency (the heads track the right trace, but position where the read start has not passed under the head). You may have to wait from 0 to (in the worst case) a full cycle.
    Since the disks move independently You can calculate that the average latency to get an small file is minimal when the stripe size is about an full cycle of an disk in the array (aprox. 250kB today). All other factors I do know do not reduce this. (controller overhead, transport,...)
    So I think that today a minimum stripe size of 256kB should be used.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now