The Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA/M.2 Review
by Kristian Vättö on March 31, 2015 10:00 AM ESTFour months ago Samsung introduced the world to TLC V-NAND in the form of SSD 850 EVO. It did well in our tests and showed that 3D NAND technology essentially brings TLC NAND to the level where planar MLC NAND stands today. The initial launch only included the most popular form factor in 2.5", but did not address the upgrade market where mSATA and M.2 are constantly growing in popularity. With today's release, Samsung is expanding the 850 EVO lineup with M.2 and mSATA models.
The move isn't really surprising because Samsung released an mSATA version of the SSD 840 EVO a bit over a year ago and when the 850 EVO was originally launched we were told that mSATA and M.2 models would follow later. The addition of M.2 is new to Samsung's retail lineup, but it makes a lot of sense given that many PC OEMs have switched from mSATA to M.2, and ultimately M.2 will be replacing mSATA in full.
Architecturally the mSATA and M.2 models are not any different from their 2.5" sibling. The heart of the drives is still Samsung's own MGX controller (excluding the 1TB model, which is powered by the older MEX controller) and the NAND is 32-layer 128Gbit TLC (3-bit per cell) V-NAND that is manufactured using 40nm lithography. TurboWrite (Samsung's pseudo-SLC caching) is also included and the cache sizes have remained unchanged from the 2.5" model. DevSleep and TCG Opal 2.0 (eDrive) are both supported too and endurance comes in at a respectable 75TB for 120GB/250GB and 150TB for 500GB/1TB models.
Given the similarity with the 2.5" model, I strongly suggest that you read our 850 EVO review for a full scope of TurboWrite, TLC V-NAND and other tidbits as I won't be covering those in detail in this review.
Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA Specifications | |||||
Capacity | 120GB | 250GB | 500GB | 1TB | |
Form Factor | mSATA | ||||
Controller | Samsung MGX | Samsung MEX | |||
NAND | Samsung 40nm 128Gbit TLC V-NAND | ||||
DRAM (LPDDR2) | 512MB | 1GB | |||
Sequential Read | 540MB/s | 540MB/s | 540MB/s | 540MB/s | |
Sequential Write | 520MB/s | 520MB/s | 520MB/s | 520MB/s | |
4KB Random Read (QD1) | 10K IOPS | 10K IOPS | 10K IOPS | 10K IOPS | |
4KB Random Read (QD32) | 95K IOPS | 97K IOPS | 97K IOPS | 97K IOPS | |
4KB Random Read (QD1) | 40K IOPS | 40K IOPS | 40K IOPS | 40K IOPS | |
4KB Random Write (QD32) | 88K IOPS | 88K IOPS | 88K IOPS | 88K IOPS | |
Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance | 3.1K IOPS | 4.9K IOPS | 6.8K IOPS | 9.7K IOPS | |
DevSleep Power Consumption | 2mW | 2mW | 2mW | 4mW | |
Slumber Power Consumption | 50mW | ||||
Active Power Consumption (Read/Write) | Max 3.5W / 4.3W | ||||
Encryption | AES-256, TCG Opal 2.0, IEEE-1667 (eDrive) | ||||
Endurance | 75TB (41GB/day) | 150TB (82GB/day) | |||
Warranty | Five years |
Like its predecessor, the 850 EVO mSATA offers capacity of up to 1TB, which still remains the highest capacity mSATA drive in the industry. Samsung has a substantial lead in its NAND packaging technology because currently no-one else is shipping 16-die packages in high volume and by comparison Samsung has been doing this for quite some time now. I've heard Toshiba has some 16-die packages available, but the yields are very low and pricing comes in at about a dollar per gigabyte, whereas other packages are priced at ~30 cents per gigabyte. Micron also has 16-die packages on paper, but I've yet to see them used in any actual products.
Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 Specifications | ||||
Capacity | 120GB | 250GB | 500GB | |
Form Factor | M.2 2280 (single-sided; SATA 6Gbps) | |||
Controller | Samsung MGX | |||
NAND | Samsung 40nm 128Gbit TLC V-NAND | |||
DRAM (LPDDR2) | 512MB | |||
Sequential Read | 540MB/s | 540MB/s | 540MB/s | |
Sequential Write | 500MB/s | 500MB/s | 500MB/s | |
4KB Random Read (QD1) | 10K IOPS | 10K IOPS | 10K IOPS | |
4KB Random Read (QD32) | 97K IOPS | 97K IOPS | 97K IOPS | |
4KB Random Write (QD1) | 40K IOPS | 40K IOPS | 40K IOPS | |
4KB Random Write (QD32) | 89K IOPS | 89K IOPS | 89K IOPS | |
Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance | 2.8K IOPS | 4.1K IOPS | 5.8K IOPS | |
DevSleep Power Consumption | 2mW | 2mW | 2mW | |
Slumber Power Consumption | 50mW | |||
Active Power Consumption (Read/Write) | Max 2.4W / 3.5W | |||
Encryption | AES-256, TCG Opal 2.0, IEEE-1667 (eDrive) | |||
Endurance | 75TB (41GB/day) | 150TB (82GB/day) | ||
Warranty | Five years |
Unfortunately the M.2 version tops out at 500GB. The reason lies in the fact that the M.2 is a single-sided design, which only has room for two NAND packages. There are quite a few laptops that use the single-sided M.2 2280 form factor as it allows for thinner designs, but I still would have liked to see a 1TB double-sided version. It is worth noting that while both PCIe and SATA based devices can have M.2 form factors, Samsung is only releasing the 850 EVO M.2 in the SATA format at this time.
With a 128Gbit die and sixteen die per package, the maximum capacity for each package comes in at 256GiB, yielding a raw NAND capacity of 512GiB, of which 500GB is usable in the 850 EVO.
AnandTech 2015 SSD Test System | |
CPU | Intel Core i7-4770K running at 3.5GHz (Turbo & EIST enabled, C-states disabled) |
Motherboard | ASUS Z97 Deluxe (BIOS 2205) |
Chipset | Intel Z97 |
Chipset Drivers | Intel 10.0.24+ Intel RST 13.2.4.1000 |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2x8GB (9-10-9-27 2T) |
Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
Graphics Drivers | 15.33.8.64.3345 |
Desktop Resolution | 1920 x 1080 |
OS | Windows 8.1 x64 |
- Thanks to Intel for the Core i7-4770K CPU
- Thanks to ASUS for the Z97 Deluxe motherboard
- Thanks to Corsair for the Vengeance 16GB DDR3-1866 DRAM kit, RM750 power supply, Hydro H60 CPU cooler and Carbide 330R case
58 Comments
View All Comments
Peichen - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
Shouldn't mSATA/M.2 intereface drives be a lot faster than SATAIII drives due to the much faster interface? I was kinda expecting 1GB/sec. speed consider there are already drive tested at 1.4 and 2.7GB/sec.MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
mSATA is SATA in a different formfactor. M.2 can be either SATA or PCI-E. As stated in the article, this drive comes (only) in the SATA form.foxtrot1_1 - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
The interface is still SATA, even if the connector is M.2. I assume PCIe M.2 drives will be coming later.Murloc - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
in a very short time they introduced a bunch of connectors and interfaces and it's all gotten quite confusing.foxtrot1_1 - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
Don't worry, it's not like there's also three different mainstream USB standards with two different plugs. Oh wait.Well, at least we have one agreed-upon display connection, that makes shopping for monitors and graphics cards easier. Oh wait.
lazarpandar - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
That's the great thing about standards, you've got so many to choose from!yslee - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
xkcd #927 puts it very nicely. :PArtuk - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link
Niceblanarahul - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
You need yo put /sarcasm tag so people don't get confused.Callitrax - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link
One thing you should probably do in M.2 SSD reviews is include how the drives are keyed, preferably in one of the tables. This is important since the M.2 interface is actually 4 semi compatible "standards" (see http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/02/understandi... As a result not all M.2 SSDs will fit in all M.2 slots. This one appears to be both B and M keyed so I think it should be pretty universal, but as an example the Samsung XP941 is only M keyed and thus will not work in the HP Stream Mini's B keyed SSD slot. (Did whoever came up with M.2 make a crappy standard that will cause lots of customer support calls and RMA's when consumers M.2 drives don't work with their M.2 equipped computers? Yes they did.)