The ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ Review: When You Need Triple M.2 x4 in RAID
by Ian Cutress on November 27, 2015 11:59 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- ASRock
- M.2
- Skylake
- Z170
ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ Software
In the beginning of this review, during the overview, I expressed concern that the ASRock software package had experienced the equivalent of a malignment over its direction. For the last few generations, we had one major software package (A-Tuning) which housed links to all the separate features in ASRock’s repertoire. This is good, as it minimizes the icons on the main screen and gives everything an easy path to access. It only works well of course if the software is light, clean, quick to respond and easy to use, which for the most part it was. So it leaves me scratching my head when A-Tuning has been gutted and all the useful tools in it have become their own separate software elements.
The front face of A-Tuning remains the same, with options for a performance mode overclock (constant Turbo), standard mode (normal) and power saving (slow ramp up to full speed). Selecting performance mode gives an advanced OC options menu that offers the same auto-OC modes as we saw in the BIOS:
Instead of seeing a tools menu next, A-Tuning gets the OC Tweaker menu.
Personally, I find this overclock menu a little mind-numbing to use. For overclocking like this, all the options should be in a single screen without scrolling down to find them, and in this circumstance having a sliders with no manual text input reduces the usefulness for all but the most persistent ASRock hardcore overclockers.
The System Info tab has its usual array of sensor information, as well as a link to the system browser.
In this new A-Tuning, Fan-Tastic Tuning gets its own main tab, offering both manual gradient adjustment and fan testing to find RPM deadzones within a fan profile. Other features in A-Tuning include Tech Service and a basic settings menu.
So where did all of A-Tuning’s fun tools disappear to? Well for a number of important ones, these migrate out to having their own icons, despite a number of them still retaining the A-Tuning design.
XFastLAN, which is ASRock’s skin over cFos’ network management software, still exists but again, similar to OC Tweaker, unless you are using the presets provided it becomes frustrating to use by virtue that the interface size is non-adjustable, so you can only see the priority of four programs at once.
The Dehumidifier function also gets pulled out into a separate program, with a funky red fire based taskbar.
XFastRAM, ASRock’s RAMDisk and caching software also becomes separate, with another fire based motif at the top.
But for ASRock’s software package, it ends there. No Online Management Guard software for the OS, no Good Night LED option, no all-in-one interface at all. I’m puzzled as to why – the previous concept was good enough to use. Basic options such as a resizable interface were my primary concerns, and half of me is hoping that the only reason these have been extracted from the main interface is because a new A-Tuning design is on the way. Fingers crossed.
63 Comments
View All Comments
zeeBomb - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
Whoa!!!dsumanik - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link
AT Theres a typo in the headline, here's the correction:The ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ Review: When You Don't Test The Headline Feature Of The Motherboard.
Otherwise knows as: We didn't do our job, but trust us it's awesome and buy it anyways.
Seriously AT?
*Facepalm
daos - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link
I completely agree! Hasn't been the same since Anand leftpedjache - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
In one of AT's previous articles, it was stated that the gtx770 used in tests gave odd results in Shadow of Mordor while the network connection was on, and said the matter will be looked into and reported. Anything on that?(more) on topic - nice review, wonderful motherboard, and kudos for praising them engineers, I happen to know they love and can't get enough of it.
Ian Cutress - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
Still looking into it.flameyyy - Saturday, November 28, 2015 - link
do the DPC latency issues have anything to do with the bugged intel networking drivers? https://communities.intel.com/thread/54594evilspoons - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
The Board Features/Visual Inspection page appears to be blank except for an introductory paragraph, as of 10:32 AM mountain time.evilspoons - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
Also, it's a shame the headlining feature (triple M2 x4 in RAID) wasn't actually benchmarked. I would have loved to see 3x Samsung 950 Pro drives jammed in this sucker.eddieobscurant - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
They will all share the same pci 3.0 x4 lanes, so there is a cap at 3.2 gb/s for the raid array. The thessdreview has a review of this combination.Flunk - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link
That's GB/s, which is 8x as much.