AnandTech Home IT Portal Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AMD's 3rd generation Opteron versus Intel's 45nm Xeon: a closer look
AMD's 3rd generation Opteron versus Intel's 45nm Xeon: a closer look
Date: November 27th, 2007
Topic: IT Computing
Manufacturer: Various
Author: Johan De Gelas
Buy the AMD OS2346PAL4BGHWOF 2346 HE Opteron
Blank
 Buy.com $183.99
 
 

64-bit MySQL (Linux 64-bit)

MySQL has released version 5.1.22, which supposedly can scale up to eight CPU cores. That would be a huge improvement considering that all versions earlier than 5.0.37 could only make good use of two CPU cores. In our experience, this new binary scales well up to four cores, but eight cores are easily 20% slower than four core systems. Thus, we tested with a maximum of four cores.


MySQL
5.1.22

Please note that these results cannot be compared with our earlier MySQL results. MySQL v5.1.22 is a completely different binary than v5.0.2x we tested previously. Although it still doesn't scale beyond four cores, it is up to 70% (!!) faster than v5.0.26 that came standard with our SLES 10 SP1. For smaller servers with four cores, MySQL is once again an ultra fast database.

Moreover, the third generation of Opterons absolutely loves this new MySQL version. At 2.5GHz, it is just as fast (the margin of error is up to 4%) as the mighty Xeon 5472 at 3GHz. As we failed to profile MySQL in depth (CodeAnalyst for Linux still has some quirks), we cannot pinpoint the exact reason why the Opteron 23xx is so good at this. The MySQL database is mostly limited by synchronizing the locks, so we suspect that the slightly faster cache coherency syncing on the Opteron 23xx might be one of the reasons AMD's latest performs so well.

WinRAR 3.62 (Windows 32-bit)

WinRAR 3.62 is a completely different kind of workload.

WinRAR 3.62 Profiling
Profile Total
Average IPC (on AMD 2350) 0.36
Instruction mix
Floating Point 0%
SSE 0%
Branches 9%
L1 datacache ratio 1.13
L1 I cache ratio 0.35
Performance indicators (on Opteron 2350)
Branch misprediction 7%
L1 datacache miss 4%
L1 Instruction cache miss 0%
L2 cache miss 3%

Notice that contrary to the other workloads we have profiled so far, WinRAR does not run perfectly in the L1 or L2 cache. Second, notice the huge amount of loads that happen: more than one per retired instruction.


WinRAR
3.62

The massive bandwidth that Barcelona can offer multi-threaded software pays off here. You can also see that the Seaburg chipset improves the score of the 3GHz quad-core Xeon by 7%.

Fritz Chess and HPC   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

43 Comments - Last by befair, 437 days ago
Username:
Password:
GIF by jojo4u, 805 days ago
Yuck, ugly GIF on the first page. Please use PNG because 256 colors are not enough for screenshots ;)

Reply
RE: GIF by SonicIce, 804 days ago
I think the color depth was decreased alot more than 8 bit. That image only has 33 unique colors in it. Something went wrong with the dithering maybe? 256 is usually more than enough.

Reply
RE: GIF by Justin Case, 801 days ago
Who cares? The only part that suffers is the gradient at the top, all the relevant information is there, and this file is about half the size of what a PNG would be.

Reply
RE: GIF by jkostans, 804 days ago
Didn't even notice.

Reply
RE: GIF by aeternitas, 788 days ago
Then why are you here? Details is what technology is about!

I for one have a pet peeve with tech sites that use the wrong formats in their stories. Slightly damages credibility. Not to say this is a big deal in this case, though .gif is pretty much dead, unless you use an old browser on old tech, but then why would you be reading this story?

Look on the bright side, at least this isnt a Codec vs. Codec story, where the author uses jpgs for such color-limited screenshots.

Reply
RE: GIF by deathwombat, 801 days ago
In addition to being less ugly, PNG's higher compression would also make the file smaller (using less bandwidth), which I assume is what they were going for.

Reply
AMD's ghost product by DigitalFreak, 805 days ago
Three months or so since "launch", and you still can't get a server with AMD quad-core chips from any of the big 3 vendors (HP, Dell, IBM). AMD really screwed the pooch on this one.

Reply
Excellent article! by jones377, 804 days ago
Any chance you could use the same tools to profile desktop applications as well in the future?

Reply
Very Nice by AssBall, 804 days ago
Thanks, Johan.

This has been one of the clearer and better proofread articles I have read here lately. It was interesting, unbiased, and insightful. I am excited to see what you get into for your next project.

Reply
RE: Very Nice by Bluestealth, 804 days ago
I agree, it was a very well done article. I can't wait to see how Intel's processors preform on Hyper... errr... Common System Interface (next year?). I believe that I will be buying AMD until that happens though for any servers.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 5

Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
DOWNLOAD vWire Today - FREE TRIAL
Take Control of Your Virtual Infrastructure. Manage VI Data & Prevent Problems.
Report Unlicensed Business Software Use
Earn Up to $1 Million by Reporting Unlicensed Software Use. Fill Out Our Form!
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!
Supermicro Barebone Servers
We Carry Everything Supermicro. Low Price, Top Service, FREE Shipping, and more.




Click Here Click Here
Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 6, 2010

Blank

 February 5, 2010

Blank




pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information