925X vs. 915 vs. Athlon 64: Gaming Performance


Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

The performance difference between 915 and 925X remains very small in Gaming benchmarks. 925X is faster, but the performance advantage for 925X ranges from almost nil in DirectX 9 games like Halo to about 2% in other games. We really expected a wider difference in 925X and 915 performance. Perhaps as DDR2 memory matures and timings improve, we will begin to see a wider performance difference in the Intel chipsets.

The Gaming advantage of the FX53 here is striking. The top Athlon 64 leads in every gaming benchmark, but it completely dominates OpenGL performance in games like Quake and the more recent Return to Castle Wolfenstein. FX53 also dominates in DirectX 8.1 games like Unreal Tournament 2003. Not surprisingly, Final Fantasy XI is another game that FX53 dominates. Other Direct X 9 titles show much more competitive performance between the Intel platforms and Athlon 64. Overall, AMD's top FX53 completely dominates Intel's top 560 (3.6GHz) in most games.

925X vs. 915 vs. Athlon 64: General Performance & Encoding 925X vs. 915 vs. Athlon 64: Workstation Performance
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • Neekotin - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    guess i'll be keeping my system for another 1 year.. hehehe ;). just gonna buy me a new GPU!
  • Degrador - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    Well this has just confirmed my plan for an athlon 64 next - I can't see any reason to be looking towards intel, either now or in the near future (next 6 months).
  • WileCoyote - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    baby steps...
  • mkruer - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    Actually now that I think of Intel might be correct. The chipset may be up to 15% faster, its just that Prescott is up to 15% slower.
  • wicktron - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    zzzzzz
  • mkruer - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    The moral of this story, buy AMD instead.
  • Falloutboy525 - Saturday, June 19, 2004 - link

    now it makes sence as to why amd isn't even bothering wth ddr2 till it speeds up

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now