Geil PC2-4300

Geil has been very active in introducing a full range of Enthusiast memory over the past year. This was even clearer when Kingston and Geil were the first two manufacturers to supply DDR2 memory for testing.



Test DIMMs were a matched pair of single-sided 512MB DDR2 DIMMs with lightweight aluminum heatspreaders. The Geil aluminum heatspreaders appear just as effective as others in this roundup, but they are much lighter than some other solutions. Geil also includes the temperature-sensitive label on the DIMM to report heat-sink temperature. While a good idea, the labels are all but hidden away when memory is mounted and they are, therefore, not very useful for truly monitoring memory temperature. They are nice to look at and talk about, however, and screen-based temperature monitoring will probably make its way to Enthusiast memory, eventually.

We do not know what memory chips are used by Geil in their memory, and the performance in our memory tests was unique compared to other tested memory.

Test Results: Geil PC2-4300

The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.

Geil PC2-4300 (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Single-Bank
Speed Memory Timings & Voltage Quake3 fps Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
533DDR
800FSB
4-4-4-10
1.8V
363.4 INT 2756
FLT 2828
INT 4854
FLT 4846
108
667DDR
1000FSB
5-4-5-10
2.0V
449.6 INT 3347
FLT 3422
INT 6016
FLT 6020
87
686DDR
258FSB
5-5-5-10
2.0V
458.0 INT 3280
FLT 3387
INT 6130
FLT 6128
85

Geil PC2-4300 (DDR2 533)
Speed RCW-ET
Radar
Aida 32
Read
Aida 32
Write
Aida 32
Total
533DDR
800FSB
77.5 5226 2059 7731
667DDR
1000FSB
96.6 6466 2303 8769
686DDR
258FSB
98.3 6857 2515 9102

Geil is an early DDR2, so we somewhat forgive the fact that across the board, it required slower timings than other DDR2 in this roundup. The memory bandwidth is also at the bottom of performance in almost every test. This is more likely the result of the early DDR2 chips used by Geil, and we are confident that current production is likely using updated DDR2 chips with better performance.

Despite the fact that this is single-sided memory running older chips at poorer memory timings, the Geil PC2 4300 also ran without incident at DDR2 667 and at the highest speed DDR2 686 that the Abit AA8 could achieve. While the Geil memory did require a bit more voltage to reach 667 and 686, it ran all of our tests without a problem at both 667 and 686. Things are certainly looking good for 667 speed on DDR2.

Crucial PC2-4300U Kingmax DDR2-533
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    #9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.
  • FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Hi Wesley, nice article. :)

    Something to change:
    At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
    Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
  • MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    > When can we expect DDR2 for A64?

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
  • mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...
  • Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.
  • KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...
  • rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?
  • Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!

    :)
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    or... im blind..
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now