Unreal Tournament 2004

The 6800 Ultra stays a little ahead of the pack, while the rest of the bunch is very even at about 69fps. These numbers aren’t very useful as the GPUs don’t seem to be the limiting factor in game play here. With these high end cards UT2K4 is very CPU bound, even at 1600x1200.

Unreal Tournament 2004 Performance

Far Cry Performance Halo
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • Booty - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    Yeah, this product naming is getting out of control - I don't even want to take the time to try to get them straight. I'll wait until everything's actually available, then try to see what the best option in each price range is. Right now, though, I have to go lie down - trying to remember what product is which gave me a headache.
  • bob661 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    #16
    I would like to know too since we 6800GT's in a CAD environment and haven't had ANY problems with them.
  • BenSkywalker - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    Any chance of seeing high res testing again?
  • Alphafox78 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    #9, how is the 6800GT "slightly unreliable"?? Ive had one for months and have no "reliability issues."
  • D0rkIRL - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    I'm looking into that X800 now, as a possible budget upgrade, so I don't have to switch over to nVidia and get the 6600GT AGP.
  • Entropy531 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    The X800 XL has some potential if it OCs well. The 6800GT is still the best option though, if you go PCI-E.
  • shabby - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    Worst refresh release ever! A minor bump in core/mem does not equal 50 bucks more.

    Im thinking that the agp x800 cards are not going to fall in price at all, these pcie only cards are not competing against them so it makes sense(for ati) to keep prices high for both the x800 and x850 cards.

    Now lets hope nvidia comes out with a 500/1200 6900 ultra :)
  • istari101 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    Considering the fact that both ATI and Nvidia are technological think tanks, you'd think they could do a less confusing job of naming their cards. :|
  • flexy - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    pricing for the "high end" cards is utterly ridiculous...the (so called) high-end (X850) which is only a refresh of current tech is totally overprized, has dual slot cooling etc.....

    And...R520 is already taped out...

    Who pays $520 for this stupid card which, not even has SM3.0 and is only marginally better than previous versions ? Retards ?
  • jkostans - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link

    I miss the days of $200-$300 video cards being the top of the line (Voodoo2, TNT2, Geforce 1-4). I dunno why anyone would want to spend any more than this on a video card unless they've got money to burn.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now