Final Words

As a show, this year's CES was relatively disappointing.  We spent far more time walking around the show than actually seeing new product and honestly, one of the most interesting announcements wasn't even at the show but rather at Macworld in San Francisco.  However disappointing the show was, it served as an example of the upcoming struggles in this new world of PC and CE technology convergence. 

As we've already mentioned, convergence is no longer about if or when, but how and who.  The culmination of decades of evolving PC and CE technology has left us with an industry that has the ability to do much, but remains largely untapped.  In many ways, AMD's DTX announcement highlights a major necessity for the next-generation of convergence products to succeed: standards. 

The entire PC industry was built around standards and companies doing their best to achieve greatness within the confines of those standards.  For us to truly have useful convergence products we need the same sort of consumer influenced standards; with everything from DRM to cellphone platforms, unity and interoperability are necessary to build useful products in the convergence space.

With its Vista, Xbox 360 and IPTV strategy, Microsoft appears to have its mind (and products) in the right place.  In one fell swoop Microsoft broke into the living room, a part of the digital household that everyone had talked about entering but few actually had. 

As competitive as Apple has become in the past couple of years, it's tough to compete with Microsoft's strategy when it comes to infiltrating the digital home.  However with the success of the iPod and initially looking at the iPhone, it appears that Apple's greatest chance for success in the current convergence market is when you're outside of your digital home.  At first glance, the iPhone appears to be what we've wanted from PDAs and later from smartphones for years now.  As always, we'll have to reserve judgment until we've got a unit in hand but the demos look impressive.

One thing is for sure; the market is changing, and the coming years will be filled with many frustratingly poor attempts at intelligent devices.  If the PC industry's evolution is any indication, the result of a bit of suffering will be a much more fun world for technology enthusiasts. 

AMD's DTX Form Factor
Comments Locked

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • Furen - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    AMD's DTX is not supposed to be as stringent as BTX. BTX required manufacturers to put the DRAM, northbridge and CPU aligned with one another in order to optimize cooling. DTX is more like a smaller ATX (with only two expansion slots and less width) than anything else. Manufacturers should be able to make very different layouts as long as they follow some basic guidelines. One thing that might be an advantage to AMD is that it can work with single-chip chipsets, though I have yet to see a single-chip IGP.
  • Aluvus - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    I am surprised Anand even had to ask why AMD didn't go with nanoBTX, given the known issue of using a processor with integrated memory controller on BTX boards. nanoBTX positions the memory and processor (relative to each other) in the same way that BTX does. This should be obvious.

    The general failure of BTX as a whole was also a factor, I'm sure.
  • floffe - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    Plus the royalties to Intel. It's no good business sense pushing a platform that means you and everyone who uses it have to pay money to your worst competitor.
  • Nehemoth - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    Yes the royalties, until i know BTX is not royalties free as the DTX "standard".

    So DTX is royalties free, is backward compatible so why don't use it?
  • Missing Ghost - Tuesday, January 16, 2007 - link

    The standard is not yet defined.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now