I'm working on a quick article on AMD's Energy Efficient and Energy Efficient Small Form Factor CPUs and I'd like a bit of feedback from you all. Currently I'm going to be looking at overclocking, power consumption and temperature in comparison to the non-EE parts, but is there anything else you'd like to know about these new CPUs? Performance is unchanged, so there's not much else to look at/talk about. Let me know.

Take care.
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Furen - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    I've been dying to see how much power Conroe's draw when overclocked and would like to see the same for the EE AMD CPUs.
  • Turnip - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    What about compatibility? Are these likely to be 100% compatible with all the same motherboards/chipsets as non-EE CPUs?
  • jackwhitter - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    i vote for passive cooling/underclocking test too. these could also end up in laptops, and laptops generally have very restricted cooling capability. the ability to dissipate all heat generated through the frame of a sff or laptop would be very useful.
  • JoshChristie - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Anand,
    How about testing whether these chips can be passively cooled maybe by underclocking them, if required? Since these chips would be perfect for media center PCs, it would be great to be able to run them fanless.

    Josh
    http://www.joshchristie.com">www.joshchristie.com
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Let me see what I can do :)

    Take care,
    Anand
  • adg1034 - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    I don't remember hearing how much the energy-efficient CPUs would cost compared to the "normal" SKUs. If you'd include a price list and release dates, that would help all us green (in the environmental way) PC builders.
  • icarus4586 - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    How does power usage compare to AMD's Turion mobile CPUs? If they're comparable on a # of core's basis, maybe a performance per watt vs Turion.
  • smitty3268 - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Maybe a quick look at performance per watt compared to Conroe? It seems to me like they should be pretty similar (but more expensive).
  • Goolic - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Performance per watt with conroe and with normal parts...
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Great idea, performance per watt completely slipped my mind - I've got some good thoughts here...

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now