Random Write Performance

The random write test is confined to a 16GB portion of the drive, which is otherwise empty. This allows the drive to demonstrate much higher performance than on our performance consistency test that fills the drive. Tasks like installing software updates can modify a lot of files, but aren't hitting the entire disk. Random writes to the entire disk are usually found only in enterprise workloads such as large databases.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write

The 950 Pro's random write speeds aren't benefiting at all from the PCIe interface or the NVMe protocol, and are about 20% slower than the SM951. Since it's happening to both drives it probably isn't a thermal issue, so this may be the result of a firmware change. Still, the Intel SSD 750 is the only retail drive that significantly outperforms the tightly clustered competition.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)

The higher power consumption during the random write test is a problem, since it's not buying any extra performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

After increasing significantly from QD1 to QD2, performance and power drop slightly and stay flat for most of the rest of the test. At the very end, a slight drop in power for the 512GB and a more significant drop for the 256GB may indicate a change in what background processing is going on; the drive may be postponing some garbage collection during the onslaught of writes at the maximum queue depth, or it may be a coincidental case of the background processing catching up and throttling back near the end of the test.

Random Read Performance

Our random read performance test is conducted on a full drive and tests queue depths from 1 to 32. We focus primarily on the lower queue depths that are typical of interactive use, but also look at how the performance and power scales to more intensive loads. For desktop use, searching and virus scanning are typically the biggest sources of random reads, and they can exercise some of the larger queue depths.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read

The strong random read performance of the 950 Pro provides great justification for its status as the a flagship drive for the consumer market.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)

The 950 Pro's power consumption is moderately higher but nowhere close to being proprotional to the performance advantage; the 950 Pro doesn't have to run hot to offer great performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

Power and performance scaling look very typical here, except I had to expand the performance axis for the 950 Pro. Both drives pass SATA's limits at or before QD16.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light Sequential Performance
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gigaplex - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    It's unlikely Samsung is holding back, as the phenomenon is affecting all brands.
  • ddriver - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link

    Corporations do price fixing, why not performance fixing.
  • niva - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link

    It is possible to do performance fixing, but not likely in this case. Enterprise hardware should generally concentrate on endurance, probably using different binning and better memory. I'm sure they can beef up the drivers too and optimize for certain loads. In general they'll get the most sales by selling in greater numbers. Artificially limiting performance so they can make more profit margin on some (much smaller quantities) hardware being sold to enterprise doesn't make sense.

    That all being said I guess it is possible.
  • ShieTar - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link

    Yes, there is a DRAM cache. The size of it is listed in the table on the first page of the article.

    Without this, random writes would still be horrible, as overwriting a complete 128KB block whenever the drive is supposed to write down just 4KB leads quickly to the need of reading, deleting & re-writing the blocks, as no unused 128KB-blocks are left.
  • Laststop311 - Tuesday, October 27, 2015 - link

    its just part of how nand cells works. If you need faster speed 3d xpoint is coming to save the day.
  • Per Hansson - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link

    The DRAM cache is not used to cache writes.
    It's large size is mainly for the NAND mapping table.
    If writes where cached in DRAM the performance of 4KB random writes would of course be waaay higher than what it is.
    And quite extreme dataloss would occur in case of power loss.
  • virtualbigd - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    Can you elaborate on your reliability point above, for Samsung?
  • virtualbigd - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    I know about 840 EVO, is there something else?
  • Samus - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I have my reservations over Samsung drives, especially since the 840 EVO, but DAMN.
  • jay401 - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    Hey if you turn that V upside down, you have the first A-NAND SSD. :D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now