Random Write Performance

The random write test is confined to a 16GB portion of the drive, which is otherwise empty. This allows the drive to demonstrate much higher performance than on our performance consistency test that fills the drive. Tasks like installing software updates can modify a lot of files, but aren't hitting the entire disk. Random writes to the entire disk are usually found only in enterprise workloads such as large databases.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write

The 950 Pro's random write speeds aren't benefiting at all from the PCIe interface or the NVMe protocol, and are about 20% slower than the SM951. Since it's happening to both drives it probably isn't a thermal issue, so this may be the result of a firmware change. Still, the Intel SSD 750 is the only retail drive that significantly outperforms the tightly clustered competition.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)

The higher power consumption during the random write test is a problem, since it's not buying any extra performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

After increasing significantly from QD1 to QD2, performance and power drop slightly and stay flat for most of the rest of the test. At the very end, a slight drop in power for the 512GB and a more significant drop for the 256GB may indicate a change in what background processing is going on; the drive may be postponing some garbage collection during the onslaught of writes at the maximum queue depth, or it may be a coincidental case of the background processing catching up and throttling back near the end of the test.

Random Read Performance

Our random read performance test is conducted on a full drive and tests queue depths from 1 to 32. We focus primarily on the lower queue depths that are typical of interactive use, but also look at how the performance and power scales to more intensive loads. For desktop use, searching and virus scanning are typically the biggest sources of random reads, and they can exercise some of the larger queue depths.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read

The strong random read performance of the 950 Pro provides great justification for its status as the a flagship drive for the consumer market.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)

The 950 Pro's power consumption is moderately higher but nowhere close to being proprotional to the performance advantage; the 950 Pro doesn't have to run hot to offer great performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

Power and performance scaling look very typical here, except I had to expand the performance axis for the 950 Pro. Both drives pass SATA's limits at or before QD16.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light Sequential Performance
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • sorten - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    'elsewhere' is one word
  • FrozenGiraffe - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    And why would these people boot it every day?
  • Rajinder Gill - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    If speed matters that much, use S3 resume, it is the fastest way back to the desktop. :)
  • Samus - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    I reboot my PC 3 times a year. I could give two shits in a cup about boot times.
  • 5th element - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link

    Couldn't. It's couldn't give two shits not could.
  • Beaver M. - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    With the beta NVMe driver it takes about 300 ms longer.
  • geniekid - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    http://techreport.com/review/29221/samsung-950-pro...

    Based on that link I would say issues with NVMe boot times are largely firmware issues that are being rectified.
  • Refuge - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    If they updated their baseline every time new tech came out then they would be so busy retesting to have comparable results, that we would never see a new review ever again.
  • AnnonymousCoward - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Thanks geniekid! That review is far more valuable than what we have here on AT. AT said "loading a new level in a video game would be more likely to show noticeable difference from better performance here". More likely, huh. Then you go look at the actual data at techreport and find there's nearly zero difference. When will AT learn to measure an SSD in an actually useful way?
  • StrangerGuy - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Game load times are actually the least sensitive to SSD speeds. Even a 15 year old game like Red Alert 2 with a next to zero RAM footprint certainly doesn't load instantly on a Crucial M550, much less current titles.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now