Crimson Performance

Last but certainly not least, let’s talk about performance improvements. Like the Omega driver before it, Crimson comes with a collection of performance improvements from AMD’s new driver branch. To preface this with caution, I don’t think anyone should be expecting massive system-wide performance gains – that’s all low-hanging fruit AMD picked long ago – but there’s plenty of room for some lesser optimizations along with game-specific optimizations.

AMD’s own numbers point to game-specific improvements of up to 20%, though it should be noted that AMD’s best-case numbers are on unreleased/beta games that have yet to be well-optimized in the first place. Otherwise AMD’s own numbers are far more tame, listing recently released games with gains between three and five percent.

To take a quick look at general performance, we went ahead and ran our GPU benchmark suite at 2560x1440 on our Radeon R9 Fury (vanilla), comparing the previous Catalyst 15.11.1 beta to the new Radeon Software Crimson 15.11 beta. The Fury and its underlying Fiji GPU is the newest product out of AMD, so it offers AMD the best opportunity to unlock any remaining performance in the architecture.

Radeon R9 Fury Driver Performance: Crimson 15.11 vs. Catalyst 15.11.1

Overall the average performance gain at 2560x1440 is just 1%. There are a couple of instances where there are small-but-consistent performance gains – Grand Theft Auto V and Grid: Autosport stand out here – but otherwise the performance in our other games is within the margin of error, plus or minus. Not that we were expecting anything different as this never was pitched as a golden driver,  but this does make it clear that more significant performance gains are going be on a per-game basis.

Final Thoughts

Wrapping things up, AMD’s development structure in the past year and going forward is one that has both been beneficial to the company and has brought with it its own drawbacks. By focusing feature releases around the end of the year driver, AMD is able to cut down on what parts of the driver they change (and thereby can possibly break) at other times of the year, and try to knock out all of their feature-related bugs at once. At the same time it makes the annual driver release a significant event, as AMD releases a number of new features all at once. However on the other hand this means that AMD has few features launching any other time of the year, which can make it look like they’re not heavily invested in feature development at those points. Then of course there’s the WHQL element, where for multiple reasons AMD hasn’t issued very many WHQL releases this year, and is something they’re seeking to change in 2016.

Looking under the hood there’s no single feature that’s going to blow every Radeon user away at once, but overall there are a number of neat features here that should be welcomed by various user groups. The Freesync Low Framerate Compensation changes should be of particular interest to Freesync users, while shader caching will improve shader loading performance across the board. Otherwise smaller fixes like the DirectX 9 improvements to CrossFire frame pacing, CrossFire Freesync, and framerate target control should be welcome news to APU and dual graphics users.

Meanwhile AMD’s radical overhaul of their control panel via the new Radeon Settings application will be quickly noticed by everyone. Though there’s plenty of room for interpretation on style and just how a good control panel is laid out, AMD has clearly put a lot of effort into cleaning up the layout of their control panel and it shows, as important options are no longer buried under multiple layers of menu trees. And on the performance front Radeon Settings is faster than Catalyst Control Center even on fast machines, and though we haven’t spent much time on covering it, AMD has also managed to speed up the installation process while they were at it. So all-told the Crimson release has something for everyone.

Ultimately I hesitate to ascribe too much of this to the Radeon Technologies Group too soon – this project has clearly been in the works longer than 3 months – but at the same time this is the RTG making their mark. It’s a new direction for AMD’s graphics group and a new look to match. And if the RTG can meet their stability, performance, and release goals going forward with the new Crimson driver, then they should be able to make 2016 a good year for the Radeon user base.

Radeon Settings: The New Face of AMD’s Drivers
Comments Locked

146 Comments

View All Comments

  • romrunning - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    I wonder if the driver will support automatically lowering fan speed while just in Windows desktop and Internet browsing, and then letting it automatically ramp up when playing games or something that is more demanding? I know newer cards support this, but it would be nice if a driver could do this for older cards, like the 7800 series.
  • Death666Angel - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    That is usually programmed in the BIOS and all cards I've known for the last decade (?) have that feature (my HD5770 definitely did). The fan speed is tied to the temperature and in Windows dekstop the graphics card does not have to work as hard, keeps cool and thus quiet and when you fire up a game the temperature increases becaues of the higher workload and gradually (or not so gradually) the fans speeds up to keep the temperature in check. If you want to change that fan curve in software, I doubt AMD will release anything in their driver as it can be a severe damage risk. But software like MSI Afterburner and I'm sure EVGA Precision and Sapphire Trixx can alter the curve.
  • Mr Perfect - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    When they say "Up to 6 major WHQL releases.", is that a commitment to do six releases?

    Call me cynical, but with ISPs using "up to X MBs!" and meaning it might hit that highwater mark on a good day with a tailwind, "up to 6" could use some defining.
  • lordken - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    who really cares for whql?
  • Alexvrb - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    I know what you mean about ISPs being dishonest - my FiOS is rated at up to 50 down and 50 up, and I only get a measly 58 down and 62 up. How dare they give me extra speed for free!!

    (they offer lots of faster plans too for not that much more but I just haven't needed the bandwidth)
  • LarryBarry - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    isn't it to risky to by a AMD product at this time ?? maybe in a half a year you won't get any support for it !! when AMD goes under!!
    I wouldn't recommend it to my worst enemy!!
  • K_Space - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    AMD won't go under next year.... Come 2019 and then we can definitely begin to prognosticate
  • AS118 - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    I just downloaded and tested this driver package. It really is much faster to load, and it's easier to navigate. The performance and feature improvements look good, especially FRTC with DX9, shader cache, and better frame pacing.

    If this keeps up, I think I'll strongly consider getting a Freesync monitor the next time I upgrade. Probably a 27" 1440p, maybe a 1200p one, if those ever become available.
  • K_Space - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    One of the features highlighted on the download page was: DP to HDMI 2.0 support but there wasn't any mention of that in the review... I keep hearing its such a biggy, what would be its main use?
  • xthetenth - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    I'm pretty sure a major use of that would be hooking an AMD card up to a 4K TV that uses HDMI 2.0 only.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now