Crimson Performance

Last but certainly not least, let’s talk about performance improvements. Like the Omega driver before it, Crimson comes with a collection of performance improvements from AMD’s new driver branch. To preface this with caution, I don’t think anyone should be expecting massive system-wide performance gains – that’s all low-hanging fruit AMD picked long ago – but there’s plenty of room for some lesser optimizations along with game-specific optimizations.

AMD’s own numbers point to game-specific improvements of up to 20%, though it should be noted that AMD’s best-case numbers are on unreleased/beta games that have yet to be well-optimized in the first place. Otherwise AMD’s own numbers are far more tame, listing recently released games with gains between three and five percent.

To take a quick look at general performance, we went ahead and ran our GPU benchmark suite at 2560x1440 on our Radeon R9 Fury (vanilla), comparing the previous Catalyst 15.11.1 beta to the new Radeon Software Crimson 15.11 beta. The Fury and its underlying Fiji GPU is the newest product out of AMD, so it offers AMD the best opportunity to unlock any remaining performance in the architecture.

Radeon R9 Fury Driver Performance: Crimson 15.11 vs. Catalyst 15.11.1

Overall the average performance gain at 2560x1440 is just 1%. There are a couple of instances where there are small-but-consistent performance gains – Grand Theft Auto V and Grid: Autosport stand out here – but otherwise the performance in our other games is within the margin of error, plus or minus. Not that we were expecting anything different as this never was pitched as a golden driver,  but this does make it clear that more significant performance gains are going be on a per-game basis.

Final Thoughts

Wrapping things up, AMD’s development structure in the past year and going forward is one that has both been beneficial to the company and has brought with it its own drawbacks. By focusing feature releases around the end of the year driver, AMD is able to cut down on what parts of the driver they change (and thereby can possibly break) at other times of the year, and try to knock out all of their feature-related bugs at once. At the same time it makes the annual driver release a significant event, as AMD releases a number of new features all at once. However on the other hand this means that AMD has few features launching any other time of the year, which can make it look like they’re not heavily invested in feature development at those points. Then of course there’s the WHQL element, where for multiple reasons AMD hasn’t issued very many WHQL releases this year, and is something they’re seeking to change in 2016.

Looking under the hood there’s no single feature that’s going to blow every Radeon user away at once, but overall there are a number of neat features here that should be welcomed by various user groups. The Freesync Low Framerate Compensation changes should be of particular interest to Freesync users, while shader caching will improve shader loading performance across the board. Otherwise smaller fixes like the DirectX 9 improvements to CrossFire frame pacing, CrossFire Freesync, and framerate target control should be welcome news to APU and dual graphics users.

Meanwhile AMD’s radical overhaul of their control panel via the new Radeon Settings application will be quickly noticed by everyone. Though there’s plenty of room for interpretation on style and just how a good control panel is laid out, AMD has clearly put a lot of effort into cleaning up the layout of their control panel and it shows, as important options are no longer buried under multiple layers of menu trees. And on the performance front Radeon Settings is faster than Catalyst Control Center even on fast machines, and though we haven’t spent much time on covering it, AMD has also managed to speed up the installation process while they were at it. So all-told the Crimson release has something for everyone.

Ultimately I hesitate to ascribe too much of this to the Radeon Technologies Group too soon – this project has clearly been in the works longer than 3 months – but at the same time this is the RTG making their mark. It’s a new direction for AMD’s graphics group and a new look to match. And if the RTG can meet their stability, performance, and release goals going forward with the new Crimson driver, then they should be able to make 2016 a good year for the Radeon user base.

Radeon Settings: The New Face of AMD’s Drivers
Comments Locked

146 Comments

View All Comments

  • xthetenth - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    They've got a reputation for poor drivers, so it doesn't matter how well their drivers stack up. I'd kill for AMD drivers right about now, I'm about to roll back to drivers that aren't set up for the games I'm playing because all of a sudden I can't alt-tab out of a game without my computer locking up for seconds at a time. I've had three different major annoyances with the drivers in the past year, and none got fixed in under a week. And that's not getting into things like surround not being able to handle heterogenous resolutions or anything.

    I'd say the grass is greener, but I don't think green is a sign of quality these days.
  • SunLord - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    Joy eyecandy. Now tell me how the hell do you arrange the position of multiple monitor desktops with this half-ass cluster fuck. I have 2 stacked monitors and a third one on the side so outside of setting up eyefintity how do i change the configuration now
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    That's one of the display options that will take you into CCCSlim.
  • SunLord - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    Save it's not there I can't find any way to move around monitor positions in CCCSlim or the new app
  • looncraz - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    Just do it in the Windows' screen settings like you're suppose to.
  • piroroadkill - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    Slim my ass, it stays in RAM once you close the window, and also spawns MOM which also remains active.

    It looks like they just haven't finished it, which is ugly.
  • Wreckage - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    Do they rebadged their drivers now?
  • K_Space - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    read the review and then come back
  • nightbringer57 - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    What about the R5 230 and R5 2XX OEM models? Are they retired as well?
  • Cryio - Tuesday, November 24, 2015 - link

    If they're GCN based, no. If they are pre-GCN, then yes.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now