SSD 2013 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Kingston SSDNow V+100 128GB (3Gbps)
Toshiba MLC
Toshiba MLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
Heavy Workload 2011 - Average Data Rate
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 116.5
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 116.5
Heavy Workload 2011 - Average Read Speed
Average Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 73.3
Average Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 73.3
Heavy Workload 2011 - Average Write Speed
Average Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 134
Average Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 134
Heavy Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time
Total Disk Busy Time in Seconds - Lower is Better 1362.2
Total Disk Busy Time in Seconds - Lower is Better 1362.2
Heavy Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time (Reads)
Disk Busy Time (Reads) in Seconds - Lower is Better 678.9
Disk Busy Time (Reads) in Seconds - Lower is Better 678.9
Heavy Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time (Writes)
Disk Busy Time (Writes) in Seconds - Lower is Better 812.7
Disk Busy Time (Writes) in Seconds - Lower is Better 812.7
Light Workload 2011 - Average Data Rate
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 179.2
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 179.2
Light Workload 2011 - Average Read Speed
Average Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 153.6
Average Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 153.6
Light Workload 2011 - Average Write Speed
Average Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 193.7
Average Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 193.7
Light Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time
Total Disk Busy Time in Seconds - Lower is Better 235.6
Total Disk Busy Time in Seconds - Lower is Better 235.6
Light Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time (Reads)
Disk Busy Time (Reads) in Seconds - Lower is Better 119.8
Disk Busy Time (Reads) in Seconds - Lower is Better 119.8
Light Workload 2011 - Disk Busy Time (Writes)
Disk Busy Time (Writes) in Seconds - Lower is Better 122.9
Disk Busy Time (Writes) in Seconds - Lower is Better 122.9
Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Write (4K Aligned) - 8GB LBA Space
MB/s - Higher is Better
4.9
MB/s - Higher is Better
3 Outstanding IOs, 4KB 100% random, 100% writes, first 8GB of LBA space, 3 minute test run, 4KB alignment.
Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Read (4K Aligned)
MB/s - Higher is Better
19.7
MB/s - Higher is Better
3 Outstanding IOs, 4KB 100% random, 100% reads, first 8GB of LBA space, 3 minute test run, 4KB aligned.
Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (4K Aligned)
MB/s - Higher is Better
227
MB/s - Higher is Better
1 Outstanding IO, 128KB 100% sequential, 100% reads, 1 minute test run, 4KB aligned.
Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (4K Aligned)
MB/s - Higher is Better
193.1
MB/s - Higher is Better
1 Outstanding IO, 128KB 100% sequential, 100% writes, 1 minute test run, 4KB aligned.
0.5KB Transfer - 2GB Sequential Read - QD4
KB/s - Higher is Better 11307
KB/s - Higher is Better 11307
Incompressible Sequential Read Performance - AS-SSD
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 222.3
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 222.3
Incompressible Sequential Write Performance - AS-SSD
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 192
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better 192
PCMark Vantage - Overall Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 16656
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 16656
PCMark Vantage - Memories Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 12007
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 12007
PCMark Vantage - TV & Movies Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 6618
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 6618
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 19861
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 19861
PCMark Vantage - Music Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 19595
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 19595
PCMark Vantage - Communications Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 12313
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 12313
PCMark Vantage - Productivity Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 21628
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 21628
PCMark Vantage - HDD Suite
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 34669
Score in PCMarks - Higher is Better 34669
Gaming Workload 2010 - Average IOPS
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
278
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
Test Description:
Actual gameplay in four 3D games: World of Warcraft, Batman: Arkham Asylum, FarCry 2 and Risen, in that order. The games are launched and played, altogether for a total of just under 30 minutes. The benchmark measures game load time, level load time, disk accesses from save games and normal data streaming during gameplay.
The gaming workload is made up of 75,206 read operations and only 4,592 write operations. Only 20% of the accesses are 4KB in size, nearly 40% are 64KB and 20% are 32KB. A whopping 69% of the IOs are sequential, meaning this is predominantly a sequential read benchmark. The average queue depth is 7.76 IOs.
Actual gameplay in four 3D games: World of Warcraft, Batman: Arkham Asylum, FarCry 2 and Risen, in that order. The games are launched and played, altogether for a total of just under 30 minutes. The benchmark measures game load time, level load time, disk accesses from save games and normal data streaming during gameplay.
The gaming workload is made up of 75,206 read operations and only 4,592 write operations. Only 20% of the accesses are 4KB in size, nearly 40% are 64KB and 20% are 32KB. A whopping 69% of the IOs are sequential, meaning this is predominantly a sequential read benchmark. The average queue depth is 7.76 IOs.
Heavy Workload 2010 - Average IOPS
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
1135
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
Test Description:
Microsoft Security Essentials running in the background with real time virus scanning enabled. We also perform a quick scan in the middle of the test. Firefox, Outlook, Excel, Word and Powerpoint are all used the same as they were in the light test. We add Photoshop CS4 to the mix, opening a bunch of 12MP images, editing them, then saving them as highly compressed JPGs for web publishing. Windows 7’s picture viewer is used to view a bunch of pictures on the hard drive. We use 7-zip to create and extract .7z archives. Downloading is also prominently featured in our heavy test; we download large files from the Internet during portions of the benchmark, as well as use uTorrent to grab a couple of torrents. Some of the applications in use are installed during the benchmark, Windows updates are also installed. Towards the end of the test we launch World of Warcraft, play for a few minutes, then delete the folder. This test also takes into account all of the disk accesses that happen while the OS is booting.
The benchmark is 22 minutes long and it consists of 128,895 read operations and 72,411 write operations. Roughly 44% of all IOs were sequential. Approximately 30% of all accesses were 4KB in size, 12% were 16KB in size, 14% were 32KB and 20% were 64KB. Average queue depth was 3.59.
Microsoft Security Essentials running in the background with real time virus scanning enabled. We also perform a quick scan in the middle of the test. Firefox, Outlook, Excel, Word and Powerpoint are all used the same as they were in the light test. We add Photoshop CS4 to the mix, opening a bunch of 12MP images, editing them, then saving them as highly compressed JPGs for web publishing. Windows 7’s picture viewer is used to view a bunch of pictures on the hard drive. We use 7-zip to create and extract .7z archives. Downloading is also prominently featured in our heavy test; we download large files from the Internet during portions of the benchmark, as well as use uTorrent to grab a couple of torrents. Some of the applications in use are installed during the benchmark, Windows updates are also installed. Towards the end of the test we launch World of Warcraft, play for a few minutes, then delete the folder. This test also takes into account all of the disk accesses that happen while the OS is booting.
The benchmark is 22 minutes long and it consists of 128,895 read operations and 72,411 write operations. Roughly 44% of all IOs were sequential. Approximately 30% of all accesses were 4KB in size, 12% were 16KB in size, 14% were 32KB and 20% were 64KB. Average queue depth was 3.59.
Light Workload 2010 - Average IOPS
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
750
Average IOs per Second - Higher is Better
Test Description:
The Windows 7 system is loaded with Firefox, Office 2007 and Adobe Reader among other applications. With Firefox we browse web pages like Facebook, AnandTech, Digg and other sites. Outlook is also running and we use it to check emails, create and send a message with a PDF attachment. Adobe Reader is used to view some PDFs. Excel 2007 is used to create a spreadsheet, graphs and save the document. The same goes for Word 2007. We open and step through a presentation in PowerPoint 2007 received as an email attachment before saving it to the desktop. Finally we watch a bit of a Firefly episode in Windows Media Player 11.
There’s some level of multitasking going on here but it’s not unreasonable by any means. Generally the application tasks proceed linearly, with the exception of things like web browsing which may happen in between one of the other tasks.
The recording is played back on all of our drives here today. Remember that we’re isolating disk performance, all we’re doing is playing back every single disk access that happened in that ~5 minute period of usage. The light workload is composed of 37,501 reads and 20,268 writes. Over 30% of the IOs are 4KB, 11% are 16KB, 22% are 32KB and approximately 13% are 64KB in size. Less than 30% of the operations are absolutely sequential in nature. Average queue depth is 6.09 IOs.
The Windows 7 system is loaded with Firefox, Office 2007 and Adobe Reader among other applications. With Firefox we browse web pages like Facebook, AnandTech, Digg and other sites. Outlook is also running and we use it to check emails, create and send a message with a PDF attachment. Adobe Reader is used to view some PDFs. Excel 2007 is used to create a spreadsheet, graphs and save the document. The same goes for Word 2007. We open and step through a presentation in PowerPoint 2007 received as an email attachment before saving it to the desktop. Finally we watch a bit of a Firefly episode in Windows Media Player 11.
There’s some level of multitasking going on here but it’s not unreasonable by any means. Generally the application tasks proceed linearly, with the exception of things like web browsing which may happen in between one of the other tasks.
The recording is played back on all of our drives here today. Remember that we’re isolating disk performance, all we’re doing is playing back every single disk access that happened in that ~5 minute period of usage. The light workload is composed of 37,501 reads and 20,268 writes. Over 30% of the IOs are 4KB, 11% are 16KB, 22% are 32KB and approximately 13% are 64KB in size. Less than 30% of the operations are absolutely sequential in nature. Average queue depth is 6.09 IOs.