Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AnandTech Bench (beta)

For years we've generated hundreds upon thousands of benchmark results for every article we do. Most of these results are presented in the articles themselves and forgotten as soon as the next big thing launches, that changes today. We're going to start opening up our internal benchmark database to the public.

The first incarnation includes CPU performance data in SYSMark 2007 for nearly all current AMD and Intel CPUs. Over the coming weeks we will add results for all of our standard CPU benchmarks, if you have any requests please email us directly. Any technical problems, please email our webmaster.










Intel Core i5 750 - 2.66GHz - 1MB L2 - 8MB L3
vs. Intel Core i7 860 - 2.80GHz - 1MB L2 - 8MB L3
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Overall
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    217
    223
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - E-Learning
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    190
    191
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Video Creation
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    243
    243
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Productivity
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    218
    220
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - 3D
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    221
    244
  • Hide me
    Adobe Photoshop CS4 - Retouch Artists Speed Test
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    18
    16
  • Hide me
    DivX 6.8.5 Encode (Xmpeg 5.0.3)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    39
    36
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 1st pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    73
    76
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 2nd pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    21
    27
  • Hide me
    Windows Media Encoder 9 x64
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    30
    30
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc 3dsmax 8 CPU Test
    CPU Rendering Composite Score - Higher is Better
    13
    15
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Radiosity
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    13
    11
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Throne Shadowmap
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    9
    9
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - CBALLS2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    5
    5
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SinglePipe2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    19
    17
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Underwater
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    24
    20
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SpaceFlyby
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    28
    25
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - UnderwaterEscape
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    24
    22
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    4238
    4490
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    14142
    16598
  • Hide me
    POV-Ray 3.7 beta 23 - SMP Benchmark
    CPU Score in PPS - Higher is Better
    2710
    3517
  • Hide me
    Par2 - Multi-Threaded par2cmdline 0.4
    Time to Recover 57.2MB from 707.5MB Archive in Seconds - Lower is Better
    30
    23
  • Hide me
    Blender 2.48a Character Render
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    60
    52
  • Hide me
    Microsoft Excel 2007 SP1 - Monte Carlo Simulation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    20
    15
  • Hide me
    Sony Vegas Pro 8 - Blu-ray Disc Image Creation (25Mbps MPEG-2)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    206
    187
  • Hide me
    Sorenson Squeeze Pro 5 - Flash Video Creation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    128
    108
  • Hide me
    WinRAR 3.8 Compression - 300MB Archive
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    96
    80
  • Hide me
    Fallout 3 - 1680 x 1050 - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    86
    90
  • Hide me
    Left 4 Dead - 1680 x 1050 - Max Settings (No AA/AF/Vsync)
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    130
    131
  • Hide me
    Far Cry 2 - 1680 x 1050 - Playback (Action Scene) - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    72
    72
  • Hide me
    Crysis Warhead - 1680 x 1050 - Mainstream Quality (Physics on Enthusiast) - assault bench
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    83
    83
  • Hide me
    Idle Power Consumption
    Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
    83
    85.4
  • Hide me
    Load Power Consumption (x264 1st Pass)
    Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
    184
    180


Add Item
Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Google Reduces ETF for Nexus, Unveils Phone Support Line
Blank
ATI Launches Radeon HD 5570, Continues to Drive DX11 Volume
Blank
Microsoft Claims Windows 7 Has No Battery Life Problems, Customers Say Otherwise
Blank
Ford Reveals All-electric 2011 Transit Connect with 80-Mile Range
Blank
Toyota Announces Global Recall of Prius, Lexus HS 250h Hybrids Over ABS Software
Blank
Boeing Spy Given 15-Year Prison Sentence
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Nexus One Reportedly Isn't Selling Well, But Linux Founder Loves It
Blank
2/8/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews
Blank
Latest Endeavour Flight Will Bring Tranquility to ISS
Blank
Google to Bring Wave, Voice to Businesses in 2010
Blank
Hot New AMOLED Displays Ready to Flood Smartphone Market
Blank
China Closes Largest Homegrown Hacker Training Website
Blank
Verizon Wireless Blocks 4chan Website
Blank
India Says it "Cannot Rely" on Biased UN Climate Panel, Forms National Institute of Himalayan Glaciology
Blank
Canon Unveils EOS T2i D-SLR, New PowerShot Cameras
Blank
Researchers Use Computing Power to Show Water Currents Shaped Fish Evolution
Blank
RIM Making Necessary Changes as Smartphone Competition Heats Up
Blank




pipeboost    Appro
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information