SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

View Single Product View Comparison

Bench Results

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB - Samsung UBX - Samsung 128Gbit MLC V-NAND

Samsung 850 EVO 250GB - Samsung MGX - Samsung 128Gbit TLC V-NAND

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

1205

305

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

680.17

177.88

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

568.8

4349.5

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.07

0.48

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

1.03

8.16

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

14.83

16.1

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

769.03

288.03

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

205

1450.1

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.05

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

1.83

1.24

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

1409.75

422.16

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

56.2

385.8

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.01

0.26

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.71

0.43

Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

282.93

228.43

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

3.69

Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

132.55

87.99

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

1.94

1.19

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

831.39

316.98

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

3.93

2.42

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

1479.52

536.14

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

3.99

2.36

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

192.3

149.63

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

2.62

1.55

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

668.66

267.53

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

3.4

2.04

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better

6332.8

5419.5

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better

18.38

10.52

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

2035.05

516.79

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

911

494.62

Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better