Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Intel Quietly Announces Core i5 and Core i3 Branding
Intel Quietly Announces Core i5 and Core i3 Branding
Date: June 17th, 2009
Topic: CPU & Chipset
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi
Buy the Intel BX80601920 Core i7-920 2.66GHz
Blank
 Newegg $288.99
 CircuitCity $289.99
 Amazon $320.99
 
 

Now that's pretty quiet. Intel, today, announced its Core i5 and Core i3 branding with very little detail. The post that inspired all of this is here, which I found from Cyril's summary on Tech Report (btw, Cyril's posts pretty much always rock).

The important take away points are as follows:

1) The new brand is Intel Core. There will be three derivatives: Core i7, Core i5 and Core i3.

2) The Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad branding will eventually disappear.

3) Pentium, Celeron and Atom will remain.

4) Centrino will also go away and Intel's WiFi and WiMAX products will inherit the name starting in 2010.

But what separates a Core i7 from a Core i5 and Core i3? I may have some insight. Let's start with desktop processors:

Desktop Processor Cores Threads Turbo
Intel Core i7 4 8 Yes
Intel Core i5 2 or 4 4 Yes
Intel Core i3 2 or 4 4 No

 

Only the Core i7 is allowed to run in a LGA-1366 socket, however there will be LGA-1156 i7, i5 and i3CPUs . The number of memory channels and the presence of a QPI link does not determine branding. In other words, Lynnfield will be both a Core i7 and a Core i5 depending on the SKU.

The LGA-1156 Core i7s will be the 8xx series, while the LGA-1366 i7s will be the 9xx series. The i5s will be the 6xx series and the i3s will be the 5xx series.

Four cores and HT enabled with turbo mode yields you a Core i7 on the desktop. If you only have support for up to 4 threads then you've got a Core i5; take away turbo and you have a Core i3.

In mobile, things are a little different:

Mobile Processor Cores Threads Turbo
Intel Core i7 2 or 4 4 or 8 Yes
Intel Core i5 2 or 4 4 Yes
Intel Core i3 2 or 4 4 No

 

The mobile i7 can be 2 or 4 cores and support 4 or 8 threads, which makes sense since there will be more dual-core than quad-core mobile processors. The rest of the lineup follows the desktop rules; i5 and i3 are capped at 4 threads and i3 doesn't have Turbo.

I've got one more thing to report. Remember how I wasn't totally sure about the turbo modes for the top end Lynnfield processor in our preview? I think I've got it:

Desktop Processor Clock Speed Max Turbo (# of Cores Active)
4C 3C 2C 1C
Intel Core i7 870 2.93GHz 3.20GHz 3.20GHz 3.46GHz 3.60GHz

 

From what I've heard, this is going to be a Core i7 870 and the turbo modes are similar to what I estimated. With two cores active this thing will turbo up to 3.46GHz (4 speed bins). That's going to be a huge boon to performance in games and other apps that have difficulty using more than 2 threads. Combine that with Windows 7's superior thread handling and I believe we have a winner on our hands.

Home

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

56 Comments - Last by red77star, 201 days ago
Username:
Password:
Hmm, so if I'm reading this right... by Eeqmcsq, 236 days ago
... the Core i3 and i5 will come either as a dual core + hyperthreading, or a quad core - hyperthreading, thus 4 threads in both cases. I take it the product number will have rules that tells us which is a dual core and which is a quad core.



Reply
RE: Hmm, so if I'm reading this right... by IlllI, 236 days ago
gawd, thats not confusing at all, huh
how is a person suppose to keep track of all these little nuances?

i miss the days of the pentium and celeron. at least back then people *knew* celeron was crap and low end.

i can't imagine a average joe person being able to figure out all the differences between i3, i5, i7.

Reply
RE: Hmm, so if I'm reading this right... by Klinky1984, 235 days ago
Celeron wasn't too bad, the 300A going to 500Mhz was hot stuff back then. Also the Celeron had 128KB of on die cache vs 512KB of half-speed off die cache. If you're talking about the Netburst era Celerons or the zero L2 Cache Celerons, then yes, those do suck.

Reply
Starting to remind me of graphics cards by philosofool, 236 days ago
This is a lot of branding and little substance from Intel. I suspect that people like Anand readers are going to pay very little attention to various brands and will instead know their stuff about the benefits involved with the various procs.

It's going to be very interesting to see how hyperthreading affects performance.

Reply
Servers by drebo, 236 days ago
Hopefully these make it into the server market very quickly. As it is, HP has discontinued all of their Core 2-based servers. They're moving to the Generation 6 ProLiants, which are all Core i7 or Core i5-based. I think they jumped the gun a little, though, as they currently do not have an offering in the low or middle market segments.

Hopefully we'll see these to market within the next month.

Reply
Poor Naming by iwodo, 236 days ago
It is not easily understandable. People will always think i7 is better and faster when it could means just about the same. To add even more confusion they add some Series Number at the end which has Virtually No meaning at all.

Previously At least you will know Q stands for Quad Core. Now you will never know if it is Quad Core or Quad Thread. And you will have to refer to your Product Table every time.

While I understand these means very little to most users since they will just think i7 is better and faster. '

To make the matter worst for System Builders, intel has managed to introduce a different socket in the same i7 brand.

And then you now have CHEAP Brands like Pentium and Celeron....Atom

So from top to bottom..

Core i7
Core i5
Core i3
Pentium
Celeron
Atom ( Although you could discount it since it is not in the same market )

Oh, it really brings back good memory when i can just choose CPU by their Brand and Mhz. No more VT / HT / Core / Thread / Cache / FSB / derivative.



Reply
How much is clever marketing? by fyleow, 236 days ago
Anand,

I see a lot of positive comments about Turbo mode but how much of this is just clever marketing vs honest to goodness engineering innovation?

I think Intel has a lot more clock speed overhead than they are letting on and this is just a margin increasing marketing strategy. Why push the limit by releasing a 4.0ghz low yield $999 Extreme Edition when you can release a much higher yield 4.2 ghz for the same price? (4.2 ghz only on single core max turbo mode of course)

I mean we can see that the 920 hits 4.0 ghz without any extreme cooling, and yet the 975 EE is only 3.3?

I hope Intel doesn't have such a short memory. They should have learned their lesson on the dangers of falling behind during the NetBurst days. It wasn't long ago that AMD was dominating the game.



Reply
RE: How much is clever marketing? by philosofool, 236 days ago
The processors aren't just for enthusiast gamers who will tolerate occasional failures: they must be rock solid in mission critical enterprise applicaitons, which is why they never meet the clock potential.

Reply
RE: How much is clever marketing? by nafhan, 236 days ago
I think a lot of it has to do with power envelopes, too. Overclocking 4 cores takes a lot more power than stock speeds, whereas shutting down 2 cores and overclocking the other 2 probably stays in the same (or possibly a lower) power envelope.

Reply
RE: How much is clever marketing? by nafhan, 236 days ago
I think a lot of it has to do with power envelopes, too. Overclocking 4 cores takes a lot more power than stock speeds, whereas shutting down 2 cores and overclocking the other 2 probably stays in the same (or possibly a lower) power envelope.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 6

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


more CPU & Chipset Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information