Gaming Performance

Reflecting the slower nature of all-in-one graphics, I've elected not to run our "Ultra" testing suite on the HP TouchSmart 610 and odds are I won't for any future all-in-ones. The hardware is simply too slow, because as you'll see by these "High" settings, 1080p is just too much work for a midrange mobile-class graphics part.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

DiRT 2

Left 4 Dead 2

Mafia II

Mass Effect 2

Metro 2033

STALKER: Call of Pripyat

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty

Disappointment sets in. To produce a gaming workload that would be at least a little more reasonable, I'll be testing all-in-ones at the "Medium" preset we use for notebooks (except employing DirectX 11 in all cases). At medium settings things improve a little, as DiRT 2, Left 4 Dead 2, STALKER: Call of Pripyat, and StarCraft II all break the 30fps mark. Really the bare minimum for a 1080p screen is a GTX 460M/560M, which is based on the desktop GeForce GTS 450 (a stand-in for which you can see in the slower Quadro 2000), or on the AMD side we'd want the HD 6850M or above.

Application and Futuremark Performance Screen Quality
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • WasabiVengeance - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    When reviewing a product, I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac). While I realize that some benchmarks can't be easily replicated (gaming), certainly the screen, boot times, and power draw could've been compared.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    "I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac"

    What is an iMac ?
  • shin0bi272 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    original version
    http://lowendmac.com/imacs/rev-a-imac-g3-233-mhz.h...

    and the current version
    http://www.apple.com/imac/

    current one doesnt look too bad but its hella expensive for what you get.
  • retrospooty - Thursday, November 3, 2011 - link

    LOL, thanks... I was being sarcastic though. He said "compare it to actual competitors" so I was clowning on Mac's
  • KoolAidMan1 - Friday, November 4, 2011 - link

    That 27" display by itself is $1100 from Dell or $1400 from NEC. That there's an i5 or i7 computer built in actually makes it a pretty good value.
  • RamarC - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    i doubt anyone is deciding between this hp touchsmart and an imac. the decision is mac or PC and then which model mac or pc.
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    I can see placing this on a desk in "kiosk" mode and using it as a touch only computer. Does HP have any plans on selling just the screen?
  • Roland00Address - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Not the same monitor, but look into the Dell st2220t 21.5 inch CCFL backlit, 6-bit E-IPS. It is 329 and works with any computer that is Vista or 7. It has been on sale routinely for $250 and once as low as $210.
  • jrs77 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Well, I'd actually like a device like that, but the screens are very lacking, especially in the touch-department.

    Resistive touchpanels are crap. Plain and simple. Additionally glossy screens are crap aswell, especially when they're ment to touch.

    So, make one of these with a matte, capacitive multitouch screen and I might actually consider such a system.
    Or even better, make one, that works like a pentablet with pressure-sensitive input like the Wacom Cintiq 24HD.
  • angelzero - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Only if this had an Active digitizer it would have been great.

    What's up with all the touch screens now not having active digitizer.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now